Skip to comments.
LA TIMES: Roland Burris must go
LA Times ^
| February 19, 2009
| OpEd
Posted on 02/19/2009 10:33:56 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
If Sen. Roland Burris (D-Ill.) had been appointed by any governor other than Rod R. Blagojevich, his dissembling on whether he tried to raise funds for his benefactor might not be fatal. But when the governor is recorded saying of the open seat that "I'm just not giving it up for [expletive] nothing," any appointee of his had better be beyond criticism and totally forthcoming. Burris is neither, and he should step down.
Burris' explanations of his contacts with Blagojevich's aides and fundraisers have shifted as often as changes in the weather. [snip]
It doesn't matter whether there was a quid pro quo behind Burris' appointment. By failing to level with investigators and the public, he has forfeited all credibility. He should resign to make way for an untainted appointment by Gov. Pat Quinn, who would have chosen a new senator in the first place if Blagojevich had had any sense of shame.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: 111th; chicagocorruption; corruptdems; cultureofcorruption; democratscandals; obamasenateseat; resignation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
The dirty hands of Rahm and 0 at work.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
The Rats are really scared of this one.
2
posted on
02/19/2009 10:34:49 AM PST
by
w1andsodidwe
(Jimmy Carter(the Godfather of Terror) allowed radical Islam to get a foothold in Iran.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
His aye vote on the “stimulus” must go also.
3
posted on
02/19/2009 10:34:54 AM PST
by
ROTB
(GOD sez "You will not envy your neighbors' [anything]." Cut it our with class envy you Communists!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I realized Burress was toast when Dick ‘Turban’ Durbin referred to him yesterday as ‘Mr Burress’ not ‘Senator Burress’.
Now, about Chris Dodd and Barney Frank.....
4
posted on
02/19/2009 10:35:35 AM PST
by
Badeye
(There are no 'great moments' in Moderate Political History. Only losses.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
As someone pointed out on an earlier thread, he Burris served his purpose. He was the 60th vote on the Porculus bill. Now they don’t need him any more.
We might be better NOT giving him the boot, since if we do, they may put someone in with a better chance of getting re-elected in two years. Otherwise, maybe we can replace him with a Republican senator.
Let the Dirty Dems and their media flunkies fight this one out.
5
posted on
02/19/2009 10:35:56 AM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: ROTB
Ignore his votes. We Conservatives NEED BURRIS precisely because he's such a typical Democrat and is such an embarrassment to Obama.
Burris has been condemned by the Washington Post, Chicago Tribune and now the LA Times.
These are all elements of the DNC machinery and cannot be trusted to hold America's interests to heart.
6
posted on
02/19/2009 10:36:55 AM PST
by
muawiyah
To: Oldeconomybuyer
And here I thought I was incapable of being truly surprised by anything any more.
7
posted on
02/19/2009 10:36:55 AM PST
by
WayneS
(Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
This guy Burris sounds like he is almost as corrupt as 0.
8
posted on
02/19/2009 10:37:16 AM PST
by
pallis
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Reminds me of the old Roman Empire where the Praetorian Guard actually auctioned off the Emperor's office (this happened only once). A tremendously wealthy Roman bought the office, paid off the Guard, and enjoyed a month of power and luxury.
Then they killed him and put a real guy in place.
9
posted on
02/19/2009 10:37:18 AM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(American Revolution II -- overdue)
To: pallis
This guy Burris sounds like he is almost as corrupt as 0. No surprise- turds from the same cesspool.
10
posted on
02/19/2009 10:38:37 AM PST
by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Folks grab a cold drink, an easy chair, the remote, and turn on the TV. It is going to fun watching the Dems try to get rid of a black guy. It does not get any better than this.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
To: Uncle Hal
I’m not sure the Senate has the stomach for it. They’ll probably wait for him to be indicted first.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Besides being right out of the Chicago Graft Machine, this guy seems more than a little off kilter. He and Byrd have more in common than just their party.
14
posted on
02/19/2009 10:41:23 AM PST
by
TCats
To: ROTB
“His aye vote on the stimulus must go also.”
Can this happen or just wishful thinking. Just askin.
15
posted on
02/19/2009 10:41:24 AM PST
by
duckman
(Jesus I trust in You. Mary take over)
To: Uncle Hal
To which I say:
Pass the popcorn!
To: Lizavetta
17
posted on
02/19/2009 10:41:36 AM PST
by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
To: Uncle Hal
Agreed. They picked Burris in the first place because they needed a quick appointment and they needed a black guy so the Senate couldn’t block it.
Now let the corrupt Dems who put him in do the heavy lifting when it comes to removing him.
Conservatives and Republicans should sit back and shut up on this one.
18
posted on
02/19/2009 10:42:09 AM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
When is the LA Times going to go?
19
posted on
02/19/2009 10:42:22 AM PST
by
Tarpon
(If you don't stand on principle, you stand for nothing at all.)
To: pallis
He's certainly as arrogant as The OneTM.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson