Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RNC Statement On Obama’s Pro-Union Executive Order (are slave labor camps next!)
RNC head - ^ | February 7, 2009 | Michael Steele

Posted on 02/07/2009 1:23:58 PM PST by LoneStarC

Edited on 02/07/2009 3:56:27 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

WASHINGTON – Republican National Committee (RNC) Chairman Michael Steele today released the following statement concerning the executive order quietly signed by President Barack Obama on Friday ordering the use of union labor for federal construction projects:

“President Obama’s executive order will drive up the cost of government at a time when we should be doing everything possible to save taxpayer dollars. Federal contracts should go to the businesses that can offer taxpayers the best value – not just the unions who supported the Democrats’ campaigns last year. Quietly signing executive orders to payback campaign backers undermines Obama promise to change Washington. It is a disappointment for Americans hoping for more transparency and less politics as usual in Washington.”

Friday, February 6th, 2009 at 12:00 am - USE OF PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENTS FOR FEDERAL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: agenda; bho2009; bho44; bhoeo; bhounions; bustunions; communism; democratparty; democrats; economy; firsthundreddays; irishneednotapply; neomarxism; obama; obamatut; pharaoh; rncchairman; socialism; socialistagenda; statement; steele; stimulus; thuggery; unions; unionthuggery; unionvote
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-188 next last
To: jessduntno
Look it up,
41 posted on 02/07/2009 1:54:00 PM PST by org.whodat (Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: peace with honor
I don't suppose you have read the rules here newbie!
42 posted on 02/07/2009 1:55:39 PM PST by org.whodat (Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
Then this hasn't been going on since '94 like you stated as it had been changed.

You came out swinging at fellow FReepers with disingenuos information.

43 posted on 02/07/2009 1:55:46 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Obama says we should listen to our enemies, but not to Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: LoneStarC; All

HA!

I was just at the White House web site and was poking around a little and found this:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/agenda/ethics/

ETHICS

The ethics section is currently being revised to reflect President Obama’s Executive Order concerning Ethics Commitments by Executive Branch Personnel, issued on January 21, 2009. Please check back soon.

What a joke our nation has become!


44 posted on 02/07/2009 1:56:34 PM PST by Mr. Jazzy (No greater friend, no worse enemy -The United States Marine Corps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
This was a standard add on to all Democrat bills when the were in charge before 1994.

So it's alright?

It stinks. Gov unions stink. I was in a union once, it stunk.

It is like kissing autonomy goodbye

45 posted on 02/07/2009 1:59:06 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

can’t say that I have, SIR


46 posted on 02/07/2009 1:59:43 PM PST by peace with honor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: thecodont; Niuhuru

Well, Obama has already been dancing over Lincoln’s coffin, while the media has been claiming he is the resurrected Lincoln.


47 posted on 02/07/2009 2:00:48 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
Counters prior executive order.

Which begs the question: Where in the constitution is this power granted to the executive? Sign a paper and voila! law of the land!...until the next president takes office. What BS.

The movie "The Ten Commandments" comes to mind as the the pharoh (played brilliantly by Yule Brenner) would intone: "Let it be written! Let it be done!

48 posted on 02/07/2009 2:01:34 PM PST by mc5cents (Show me just what Mohammd brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: LoneStarC

No press conference about this order? No MSM coverage? You don’t think they are trying to hide this do you?


49 posted on 02/07/2009 2:03:48 PM PST by Jeff Gordon ("An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile hoping it will eat him last." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Mmmmm, I do remember that Beyonce once danced on the tomb of Ulysses S. Grant.

I wonder what they’ll do to Washington and Adams.


50 posted on 02/07/2009 2:06:45 PM PST by Niuhuru (Fine, here's my gun, but let me give you the bullets first. I'll send them to you through the barrel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Pantera

I think Big “O” has made things perfectly clear. Unless you are either union, or black (or probably BOTH)....

don’t expect to be gainfully employed in this, his “new AmeriKa”.


51 posted on 02/07/2009 2:07:23 PM PST by XenaLee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

Thanks


52 posted on 02/07/2009 2:08:04 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Obama says we should listen to our enemies, but not to Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: LoneStarC

This is the Bush Executive Order that Obama will be considering reversing next:

http://www.ebiinc.com/blog.aspx?id=2188&blogid=210


53 posted on 02/07/2009 2:14:00 PM PST by acoulterfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

>> the vast majority of american workers will have to submit to joining a union

Unions don’t want the vast American work force - that would certainly break that unions like filling a balloon with a fire hose.


54 posted on 02/07/2009 2:17:40 PM PST by Gene Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LoneStarC
I swear Republicans just don't know how to play the spin game.

Listen, the Republican headline on this needs to be:

"Obama denies stimulus money to non-union workers"

See? That's not so hard.

55 posted on 02/07/2009 2:18:44 PM PST by mc6809e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I am not a lawyer but section 5 states that this only a suggestion.

Sec. 5. This order does not require an executive agency to use a project labor agreement on any construction project, nor does it preclude the use of a project labor agreement in circumstances not covered by this order, including leasehold arrangements and projects receiving Federal financial assistance. This order also does not require contractors or subcontractors to enter into a project labor agreement with any particular labor organization.


56 posted on 02/07/2009 2:45:33 PM PST by greeneye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Saturday, February 07, 2009 1:50:41 PM · 35 of 56
jessduntno to jessduntno
The first order repeals Executive Order 13201, or Beck Order, that required contractors to inform employees of their rights in refusing to pay union dues earmarked for non-collective bargaining activities, including politics and lobbying. In addition, the new order mandates that most federal contractors and subcontractors post and comply with a notice informing employees of their rights under federal labor laws or face consequences that could include losing the contract and being blacklisted from future projects. This order is effective immediately, although the Secretary of Labor has 120 days to initiate a process to determine the form and content of the rule.

The president also issued an executive order prohibiting federal contractors from being reimbursed for costs associated with educating employees about joining a union, including preparing and distributing materials; hiring or consulting legal counsel; holding meetings; and activities planned or conducted by managers, supervisors or union representatives during work hours. The Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council must enact this rule within 150 days.

The third executive order mandates that service contracts covered by the Service Contract Act include a clause requiring contractors to offer workers employed under a previous contract the right of first refusal for non-managerial and non-supervisory positions they are qualified for. Penalties for not complying with this order include paying back wages and the possibility of a three-year debarment from federal contracts. The Secretary of Labor must issue regulations within 180 days.

Although the executive orders raise a number of concerns for ABC and its members, the extent of their impact on ABC members will be unclear until the regulations implementing the orders are proposed. ABC will participate in the rulemaking processes for each order, and will provide timely updates on these and other executive orders issued by the Obama administration.

Executive Order 13495: Notification of Employee Rights Under Federal Labor Laws

Executive Order 13496: Economy in Government Contracting

Executive Order 13497: Nondispacement of Qualified Workers Under Service Contracts


57 posted on 02/07/2009 3:19:50 PM PST by jessduntno (The bailout is "Obama's trillion-dollar debacle.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: LoneStarC

I have a question. Are the unions going to open their ranks to illegal aliens since we are always told they are the only ones who will do the work.


58 posted on 02/07/2009 3:22:34 PM PST by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneStarC
And all this in only the first two weeks!

His true colors are coming through loud and clear (although most of us had him pegged from day one). I've noticed a lot of buyers remorse out there. He's overstepping and backlash from the American people has already started.

59 posted on 02/07/2009 3:27:43 PM PST by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
I some times wonder about the age and mental abilities of many of the posters here. This was a standard add on to all Democrat bills when the were in charge before 1994.

I some times wonder about the purpose of your posts.
60 posted on 02/07/2009 3:46:06 PM PST by Girlene (Hey, Repub's: This is an entrepreneurial insurgency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-188 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson