Posted on 02/03/2009 11:52:39 AM PST by dascallie
No. 08-570 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- PHILIP J. BERG, Petitioner, v. BARACK OBAMA, et al., Respondents. --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari Before Judgment To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Third Circuit
"A potential constitutional crisis under President Barack Obama now looms more and more with each passing day. This Court must recognize that its duty to the nation and to the law in the instant case is far greater than that duty which Chief Baron Pollock faced in Byrne v. Boadle. "
(Excerpt) Read more at wthrockmorton.com ...
There is not one shred of evidence to prove PolitiFact’s conclusion that the candidate’s name is Barack Hussein Obama, or to support allegations that the birth certificate he released is authentic.
Fake Phd?
Really? Prove it.
And what is YOUR basis for buying this whole magically appearing pristine COLB, hook line and sinker?
And what is your rationale for why your Obama will not DARE approach the topic of his birth certificate? And dispatches his legal minions to obstruct it’s release?
Go ahead, tell me.
Who are these national leaders that you speak of?
Dick Cheney?
John Roberts?
Justice Thomas?
Phil Berg?
John McCain?
Sarah Palin?
Justice Alito?
Justice Scaila?
The “Certificate of Live Birth” is a birth certifcate.
Stop saying the same old tired sh*t. You know it’s NOT
“You are a flaming LIAR. You show up on these threads to make the issue as murky as possible.”
Knock it off. If you disagree with something I say, explain. Back it up. Don’t be calling people liars.
I show up on these threads to clarify the facts. The problem is that people keep repeating these false stories and myths. That you don’t like to hear that doesn’t make it untrue.
BULLSH*T. Nothing you say is factual or true.
Thanks for the ping!
So did granny toot, that's why he kept her hidden. That's why Bill Richardson said he was an immigrant. Hillary and Bill know too, that's how she got that SOS. What happened imo was that maybe zer0 didn't even know until he needed the bc. Maybe he did know and thought he could pull it off. When you have people like Soros, and foreigners worth billions, with a vested interest in this country, you think forging a bc is a big deal? Pullleeeezze, piece of cake. Soros acna manipulate the market and the banks in England but he couldn't assist in hiding the real bc. Do you really believe Rahm went on a planned 2 week trip to Africa at Christmas? Right after he was named as zer0s main man. GIVE ME A BREAK.
Take your own advice. Denying the truth doesn't make it go away.
You never tire of posting that Obama COLB forgery
LMAO and it’s the ONLY picture in mlo’s photobucket account. That says it all. Who sent that to mlo? Axelrod? factcheck?
You should really stop posting your self-portraits on these threads. This isn’t Facebook.
An alias. Some unknown person on the internet writing an absurdly unprofessional "analysis". What does he have to say about OJ's Bruno Magli shoes?
That, genuis, was the promo copy pasted in from the Globe.
Not mine.
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2008
Ron Polarik’s Final Report
Polarik writes of President-elect Obama’s birth certificate that the Obama campaign had posted on a left-wing blog:
“from the first time I saw the Daily Kos image, or what I now call, “Obama’s bogus birth certificate,” that something was just not right about it. As someone who has scanned hundreds of thousands of documents in his lifetime, I had a hard time accepting that this was an original scan image made from an original paper document. As Fate would have it, right then, on June 13, I was looking at the conclusive evidence that the text on this image had been graphically altered, or “manufactured,” as my first blog post would claim.”
Polarik writes that he was subjected to harrassment from pro-Obama goons, which sounds like business as usual for the thuggish Obama pro-closed-society camp.
Polarik quotes from Authenticate 360, a document security expert:
Birth certificates are generally used as “breeder” documents to gain other identity documents and to perpetuate fraud. But unlike Social Security cards, birth certificates are issued by hundreds, if not thousands, of entities, with little regard to consistency or security. An accurately forged birth certificate is a dangerous document, allowing the bearer significant access to everything from driver’s licenses to passports...The increasing availability and affordability of high-quality digital scanners and copiers is a constant threat to the authenticity of government issued documents.
Polarik writes:
“There is conclusive and irrefutable evidence that the COLB image created and distributed by Obama’s campaign to the Daily Kos, Annenberg’s Factcheck, and the St. Pete Times, Politifact, is, unquestionably, a false identification document. Furthermore, there is conclusive and irrefutable evidence that the photos taken by Annenberg’s Factcheck, in collusion with the Obama campaign, are themselves, false identification documents, having been made from the same false identification document image, as well as from additional false identification documents created for the same purpose; namely, to proffer these false identification documents as true reproductions of a genuine, Hawaii-issued and certified, “Certification of Live Birth” document, and thereby, intentionally deceive the American public into believing that Barack Hussein Obama is a natural-born citizen of the United States, and thereby, fully qualified to become their President...
“...here we are, more than twenty months after Obama announced his candidacy for the Presidency, and nearly three weeks after the election, and Obama still refuses to show his real birth certificate!”
Polarik goes on to write:
“To validate my findings that the text in this COLB document image was the result of graphic alternations, and not a result of any printer or scanner artifacts, I made over 700 test scans and images using an actual paper COLB and different scanners that were subjected to different combinations of scanning and image parameters. I was finally able to replicate the Kos image so closely that other image experts thought it was the same Kos image, and not my “clone.”
“From this date forward, when I first discovered the evidence of tampering, and regardless of the unfamiliar format of the COLB and the questionable information it contained, I collected a great deal of additional evidence, that the scanned image alleged to be a true copy of Obama’s original COLB was forged, and that this altered image of an official state-issued document is nothing less than a false identification document as defined by Chapter 18, Section 1028 of the United States Code.
“All of my findings pertaining to a single source image and the four copies made from of it that are still posted on the four (4) websites, DAILYKOS.COM, FIGHTTHESMEARS.COM, FACTCHECK.ORG, and POLITIFACT.COM, as referred to and described above, are outlined in my Final Report”
After reviewing birth certificates that appeared on Fact Check and Daily Kos, Polarik concludes:
“I have thoroughly examined the photographs that FactCheck published, and have subsequently found clear and irrefutable evidence of tampering with both the alleged COLB objects photographed and with the photos themselves. One of those COLB objects was, in fact, a printout of a forged document image with the Seal superimposed onto it for the final pictures.”
“With my experience and specialization in document imaging, my findings are conclusive and irrefutable that the COLB images posted by Obama to his campaign website, fightthesmears.com, to the dailykos.com, a pro-Obama blog, to FactCheck.org, a pro-Obama political research group, and to Politifact.org, are, in fact, image forgeries with the intent to defraud the American People into believing that these images were digitally scanned from Obama’s genuine, “original” birth certificate.”
Of the certificate that appeared on the various pro-Obama sites, Polarik writes:
“Specifically, I saw that the text in this image bore the telltale signs of being graphically altered after the image was created. From June 13 onwards, the unfamiliar format of this document, and the questionable information that it contained, became tangential to my discovery that the scanned image alleged to be a true copy Obama’s original COLB, was a forged document image. Now, with four months worth of research and supportive evidence behind me, I can now say, without any reservations, that my initial recognition of this image forgery was absolutely correct.”
“...That is, the original text had been graphically altered from what was originally written there. The signs of this “overwriting” were patently obvious to me, yet, as I was soon to learn, not at all obvious to anyone else (anyone, that is, who had personally seen and analyzed this COLB image, who knew enough about how COLB’s are made, and who wanted to prove to the public that it was a forged image).”
“What is particularly important for the reader to realize is that, after four months of controversy over a single image allegedly scanned from Obama’s original birth certificate, that image is still the only one ever made. Any time anyone on the Left is asked the birth certificate question, what we get back is a rhetorical question, like “Do you really think that a US Senator running for President would fake his own birth certificate?” How come they never ask why, with over $600 million dollars collected in campaign contributions, the Obama campaign could only afford to produce one lousy-looking image copy?”
“...NO, it was never intended to be a high quality image, which is how “high resolution” should be defined...Why is this discussion relevant to spotting a potential image forgery? Because, a forger knows that the evidence of graphical manipulation is more likely to be detected in a larger image of higher quality than in a smaller image of lower quality...
“No matter how many challenges to my conclusions have come my way, I have never wavered from the inescapable truth, that an image of someone’s real COLB had been markedly altered to look like it belonged to Obama. Or so the forgery conspirators thought.
“To summarize, there was one, original source image that was forged, and four copies of this source image were distributed to (1) the pro-Obama Daily Kos blog, (2) Obama’s Fight The Smears campaign website, (3) Annenberg’s Factcheck website, and lastly, the St. Petersburg times Politifact website...
“The forgery began its life as an actual scan of a real, 2007 Hawaiian “Certificate of Live Birth,” (COLB) that belonged to someone other than Obama (No, not his sister). The image acquired by the scanner was then saved as a JPG file. This is the file that was sent to the person who would do the actual forging. Whoever that person was, he or she was sent the information that was to go on the image. I doubt that the forger was the same person who did the scan (or scans, plural. In my analyses, I discovered that there had to be more than one COLB image used to make the forgery). Whoever did the scan did not have Obama’s real birth certificate on hand, nor did he or she pull the birth information out of thin air. Only Obama, himself, knows the full truth of his birth origin, and only Obama would know which parts of it needed to be “modified.” Somehow, and by some mean, that information needed to be relayed to the forger.
“The most salient point about the person who created the forgery (a person I dubbed, “Dr. X”) is that he or she was not very diligent in its construction, even though the process used was sound. The original image, that served as the basis for the forgery, was made from a scan of a real, 2007 COLB that belonged to someone other than Obama (No, not his sister). This image acquired by the scanner was then saved as a GIF file (an image format different from the JPG format of the four image copies posted online). This GIF image was then imported into a graphics program (NOT Photoshop) where the existing text was covered over with portions of the background pattern, and on top of that, in the spaces where the original text formerly information appeared, fraudulent information was typed in to make the image LOOK like it was Obama’s COLB. I say, “fraudulent” information, because if it were true, then Obama would have had no reason to refuse showing a real, paper copy of his COLB from Day One.”
“Three months later, no other “reporters” have ever received a copy of this “birth certificate” image, or any other birth certificate image, for that matter, from Tommy Vietor or any one else. To reiterate, there has been one, and only one, image alleged to have been scanned from Obama’s “original birth certificate,” and that the only people alleged to have received a copy of this document image from the Obama Campaign have been (1) Markos Moulitsas, the creator of the Daily Kos, a pro-Obama blog, (2) FactCheck, a pro-Obama political research group, and (3) Politifact.”
“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.”
“Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”
Polarik goes on to discuss additional analyses. He concludes:
“To put it bluntly, the Factcheck photos have been “Frankensteined,” just as the Factcheck scan image was cobbled together with the parts of different COLBs. The use of the term, “document” is simply for expediency sake, as no, single “real” document was used for these photos or for the scan image.”
All of this is going to take some time to digest. I suggest that you start reading what Polarik says as I am.
Not all scanners are equal. Folds don't always show up clearly, though they are there if you look carefully.
You're right "African" is not a race nor does it have any legal connotation for the perposes of a BC. No parent can "choose" what to put down on a legal document as to race
In many instances, yes you can. In point of fact, there is no standard legal definition of race.
Perhaps you can explain how he traveled through Indonesia in the 80's as he stated in his books?
Uhh..maybe by on trains and busses? Wild guess there...
He repeatedly drags out the lie that the HI officials say that the thing posted on websites is an authorized BC or whatever he is saying it is.
When they did not say that. I’m sick of him and his crap.
There are no folds on the original post. The cheapest scaner you can buy will show the folds...it's a proved fraud anyway.
Uhh..maybe by on trains and busses? Wild guess there...
Uh...US citizens were not allowed in Indonesia in the 80's, how did he pull that one off?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.