The predicted defense weakness and pandering to our enemies and the so-called "international community" (known by real Americans as the United Nations) is now clear. Where are we going to find a REAL Commander-in-Chief if we have to defend ourselves?? I bet our enemies and "our guests" at Club Gitmo are laughing their asses off right now ----
1 posted on
01/16/2009 1:10:13 PM PST by
EagleUSA
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: EagleUSA
Make them sit in the Comfy chair.
That will make em talk.
2 posted on
01/16/2009 1:11:48 PM PST by
gov_bean_ counter
( Barak Obama: Pontificator in Chief and Poster Child for the Peter Principle)
To: EagleUSA
3 posted on
01/16/2009 1:12:31 PM PST by
Chet 99
To: EagleUSA
Any bets on how long it takes before we get hit again?
4 posted on
01/16/2009 1:12:49 PM PST by
BigFinn
(cHANgE! wE HAZ IT BEfORE WE HaZ IT!)
To: EagleUSA
Obama is going to get a lot of people killed.
5 posted on
01/16/2009 1:12:58 PM PST by
Badeye
(There are no 'great moments' in Moderate Political History. Only losses.)
To: EagleUSA
Sources: Obama Ready To End Harsh InterrogationsAnd begin stern language?
6 posted on
01/16/2009 1:13:09 PM PST by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: EagleUSA
God, the man is a fool and will endanger us ALL.
9 posted on
01/16/2009 1:14:03 PM PST by
SE Mom
(Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
To: EagleUSA
Bush always erred on the side of Protecting America’s citizens from its enemies. Obama seems bent on reversing that and making his judgements by erring on the side that protects America’s enemies instead.
10 posted on
01/16/2009 1:14:24 PM PST by
tomnbeverly
("In the hour of darkness and peril and need, the people will waken to listen and hear.....)
To: EagleUSA
Obama-Soros better be praying that nothing happens on his watch because, if it does, he may be the first President in U.S. history to be recalled.
11 posted on
01/16/2009 1:14:42 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(You give peace a chance. I'll stay back here and cover you, just in case it don't work out.)
To: EagleUSA
However, Obama's changes may not be absolute. His advisers are considering adding a classified loophole to the rules that could allow the CIA to use some interrogation methods not specifically authorized by the Pentagon, the officials said. So how is this any different than current policy?
To: EagleUSA
He was harsher interogating his own staff (remember when he wanted to know what names they blogged under?)
and yet a known tax cheat will be our next treasurer.
Someone put a security camera over his desk.
14 posted on
01/16/2009 1:15:12 PM PST by
weegee
(Beware the Green Menace, the socialists warning you of global warming under your bed are hysteric.)
To: EagleUSA
Oh—I thought this was about Eric Holder and the harsh inquisitions into his part in the pardoning of Marc Rich.
17 posted on
01/16/2009 1:15:41 PM PST by
Palladin
(Kudos to Chesley Sullenberger: a true American hero!)
To: EagleUSA
This is actually quite reational of Obama. When people share your world outlook, why would you want to ask them tough questions. You already know the answers.
18 posted on
01/16/2009 1:15:56 PM PST by
DoughtyOne
(I see that Kenya's favorite son has a new weekly Saturday morning radio show.)
To: EagleUSA
I don’t believe it. They don’t care about the terrorists. They will quickly come to believe that their political and economic ends demand that they use “harsh” measures.
To: EagleUSA
One of these guys they don’t interrogate and let go is going to be part of something bad. It cannot help 0 to enable terrorists.
24 posted on
01/16/2009 1:18:33 PM PST by
Mike Darancette
(0 parties while the economy burns.)
To: EagleUSA
I suppose they could be sent to the Saudis for interrogations.
25 posted on
01/16/2009 1:19:11 PM PST by
InvisibleChurch
(Grace = unmerited favor; Mercy = punishment withheld)
To: EagleUSA
To: EagleUSA
He doesnt want them to get in people’s faces like his Acorn tribesmen do?
What a friggin hypocrite.
29 posted on
01/16/2009 1:21:28 PM PST by
Canedawg
To: EagleUSA
From my intense investigation of Obama’s policies, it looks as if the “misunderstood personnel” (terrorists) will have to sit in a timeout. After said timeout if the “misunderstood” has a second infraction there will be a stern talking too and possibly a benching during recess without snack.
32 posted on
01/16/2009 1:23:02 PM PST by
repubpub
To: EagleUSA
Director of CIA to President Obama, *Sir, the terrorist are going to blow up a major city tonight. We have a suspect in custody who can tell us who and where. What shall we do?
Obama to CIA Director, “ Read him his rights!”
35 posted on
01/16/2009 1:24:44 PM PST by
kempo
To: EagleUSA
This rule will not apply to conservatives. In our case, waterboarding will not be considered torture.
37 posted on
01/16/2009 1:24:59 PM PST by
dforest
(Is there any good idea out there that Obama doesn't lay claim to anymore?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson