Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China's homemade army vehicle outshines U.S. Humvee in major
Xinhua ^ | 2009-01-12

Posted on 01/12/2009 3:23:08 AM PST by pobeda1945

BEIJING, Jan. 12 (Xinhua) -- The "Mengshi (Warriors)" off-road military vehicle produced by Chinese automaker Dongfeng Motor surpasses U.S. Humvee in 12 out of 15 major battlefield performance indices, chief designer Huang Song has said.

Use by the Chinese military force has proven that "Mengshi" overtakes Humvee in 12 indices, including the loading capacity andoil consumption, and are well-matched with Humvee in three other indices, Huang was quoted as saying by Monday's Economic Information Daily, a Xinhua publication.

It took Dongfeng six years to develop the vehicle, which had undergone more than 200,000 hours of factory tests and more than 1.6 million kilometers of road tests before mass production.

The vehicle was formally equipped to the People's Liberation Army in 2007.

"Mengshi" has also passed various environmental and geological tests, including airdropping, high altitude and extreme heat and cold weather conditions.

With 75 patents, the 1.5-ton high mobility vehicle met all military requirements, said Huang.

It also won the first class award of national science and technology progress at the 2008 State Top Scientific and Technological Awarding Conference here last Friday.

This was the first such award won by the auto industry in 22 years.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: china; chinesepropaganda; hummer; humvee; madeinchina; manufacturing; military; propaganda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: goldstategop

> China is capable of producing high quality trucks. Its obviously a clone of the Humvee.

Quality trucks, quality tools, quality instrumentation... while the world has slept China has done exactly what Japan did. And it worked.

India is doing the same thing.

Here in NZ we have been getting Chinese and Indian manufactured goods at ridiculously cheap prices, ahead of most the rest of the world. To begin with, it was mostly junk. Then, mostly hi-quality knock-offs of Japanese or Korean goods. Now, Chinese branded goods and not so inexpensive anymore.

If America still wants to have a manufacturing capability they better watch out: after WW-II they stood alone in this field. Now, there is Japan, Germany, Korea, China, India, Russia...


21 posted on 01/12/2009 4:08:39 AM PST by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DieHard the Hunter

I am going to let you in on a little secret...auto manufacturing is one of the most low tech manufacturing items available today. Anyone can be trained to work on an assembly line in less than 3 minutes. The reason the foreign companies have the advantage is they can fire the incompetent, and the lazy. Our auto companies do not have that luxury.......


22 posted on 01/12/2009 4:15:23 AM PST by joe fonebone (The libtard votes in every election, regardless of the candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It is a cracker box on a pickup or Surburban Frame. I have a Yukon XL 2500, that is far more comfortable, and stylish, and it has the same 4x4 running gear and ground clearance for half the money..................??????


23 posted on 01/12/2009 4:18:29 AM PST by Concho (Bitterly Clinging to Guns and Religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pobeda1945

“The “Mengshi (Warriors)” off-road military vehicle produced by Chinese automaker Dongfeng Motor surpasses U.S. Humvee in 12 out of 15 major battlefield performance indices, chief designer Huang Song has said.”

So - - - if you don’t believe the Chinese vehicle is better than the Humvee, just ask the designer of it. He’ll tell you.


24 posted on 01/12/2009 4:20:59 AM PST by RoadTest (The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it? - Jer.17:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DieHard the Hunter

So, what does your Gaelic tagline say? “All Ozzies are losers and traveling Poms? ??? ;-)


25 posted on 01/12/2009 4:21:48 AM PST by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker
I saw no evidence of it when we went to China for Nortel. They confiscated our RF test gear and we sat in a hotel room for almost three weeks waiting to get it back. They could have just as easily bought it on the open market and copied it. It was commonly available test gear, nothing secret. When we did get it back it was obvious it had been disassembled, inspected and reassembled, only nothing worked.

They do everything on the cheap. Look at it from their perspective. Why should they have to go out and buy it when these Nortel guys just delivered it to them free of charge?

26 posted on 01/12/2009 4:24:59 AM PST by Philo1962 (Iraq is terrorist flypaper. They go there to die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: pobeda1945

I haven’t read all posts, but thought I’d mention that GM which manufactures Hummers is doing some manufacturing in China. I’m not sure what vehicles and what the arrangement is with China, but it appears on the surfaceChina has GM’s blueprints for the Hummer.


27 posted on 01/12/2009 4:26:16 AM PST by Perseverando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pobeda1945
It must be true....The PLA says so.
28 posted on 01/12/2009 4:26:52 AM PST by Tainan (FRONT TOWARDS ENEMY <- remember these words, there will be a test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

(grin!) It’s my family motto:

“I am the Chieftain of my Clan. I bow to nobody. Get out of my way.”


29 posted on 01/12/2009 4:27:31 AM PST by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: RoadTest
So - - - if you don’t believe the Chinese vehicle is better than the Humvee, just ask the designer of it. He’ll tell you.

It may very well be true, but if it is true, building that vehicle in an American factory would cost significantly more than building a Humvee. It's not very hard to multiply all the dimensions by 1.1 or even 1.01, to get higher ground clearance and greater cargo capacity. Of course, they don't have to deal with such Congressionally imposed refinements as passenger restraint systems and emission controls ...

30 posted on 01/12/2009 4:29:45 AM PST by Philo1962 (Iraq is terrorist flypaper. They go there to die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Tainan

I’ll wait for consumer reports. They will prove that the japanese humvee is the smart choice.


31 posted on 01/12/2009 4:30:48 AM PST by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Philo1962
Look at it from their perspective.

I am and it's the up close and personal kind of perspective. I know the Chi-coms are copycats. I've seen it first hand, but you don't have to go to China to see that. I also know that they deserve every bit of the reputation they have for not honoring patents and intellectual property rights. This notion that they are suddenly worried about their reputation in this area is just more Chi-com propaganda, sorta like how they claim their knock off Humvee beats the original article in 12 out of 15 "tests".

Why should they have to go out and buy it when these Nortel guys just delivered it to them free of charge?

Professional ethics? Honoring the rule of international law? Honesty? Integrity?

32 posted on 01/12/2009 4:34:07 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Government is not the solution to the problem. Government IS the problem - Ronald Wilson Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

> I am going to let you in on a little secret...auto manufacturing is one of the most low tech manufacturing items available today.

I suspect that if the Chinese aren’t using robots by now, they will be very soon.


33 posted on 01/12/2009 4:34:52 AM PST by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Philo1962

I know, since the patent is expired, we can stop making our own hummers and start buying them from the chinee.


34 posted on 01/12/2009 4:41:41 AM PST by ichabod1 (Change is not a destination, Hope is not a strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Maybe...just maybe...I buy one for about $1500 new. Secretly import it to the US. Glue an “H1” emblem on the side and sell it to some yuppie for $100,000. He could likely still get parts and service from the local GM dealer. They may not be able to tell, either...


35 posted on 01/12/2009 4:45:16 AM PST by Onelifetogive (Let's get to altering or abolishing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

I thought one of the reasons the foreigns are doing so well here was because they DO spend the money and time to thoroughly train the line workers, and not just on one station, but on many different ones so they can react to market and personnel changes. Not that being able to fire someone if it’s just not working out isn’t a huge competitive advantage.

Have you noticed how ironic it is that it’s almost impossible to fire someone for cause in America today, but firing them (laying them off) for NO cause is the easiest thing in the world.


36 posted on 01/12/2009 4:45:29 AM PST by ichabod1 (Change is not a destination, Hope is not a strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker

Does any chinese have any integrity, honesty, and ethics, or is it just the government that is sneaky and inscrutable?


37 posted on 01/12/2009 4:47:45 AM PST by ichabod1 (Change is not a destination, Hope is not a strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Mengshi must be chinese for Hummer.


38 posted on 01/12/2009 4:53:28 AM PST by 6SJ7 (Atlas Shrugged Mode: ON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tainan
It must be true....The PLA says so.

And don't forget it's in that journalistic blowtorch The Economic Information Daily, (a Xinhua publication). Double plus good.

39 posted on 01/12/2009 4:53:38 AM PST by yankeedame ("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1
Does any chinese have any integrity, honesty, and ethics, or is it just the government that is sneaky and inscrutable?

Obviously, I can't speak for the entire population. Some of the average folks we met were salt of the earth types and would literally give you the shirt off of their back if you needed it. This is way more than I can say for the Russians I worked with on another project. However, all of the "officials" we encountered in China seemed suspect of us and everything we brought with us. Some of that is a cultural thing, but I think most Americans would feel that they were treated, at best, rudely if they had gone through the same experiences we did with Chinese customs. I know several others who traveled to China to work on other projects and everyone pretty much came away with the same impression.

40 posted on 01/12/2009 4:57:36 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Government is not the solution to the problem. Government IS the problem - Ronald Wilson Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson