Posted on 01/03/2009 7:01:24 AM PST by dascallie
Can you provide any link that says the Clintons could not find anything on Obama? Or is this supposition?
More to the matter is the Clintons are just as bought and paid for as Obama and they do not dare buck the system they aligned themselves with. Those who paid for their enslavement would ruin them. Soros and moveon.org, mediamatters, dailykos, factcheck.org would have them out of the country in shame so quick their heads would roll.
Yes, but did your grandmother go to a mortuary for burial or cremation and does your grandmother have a burial plot or anything death certificate from a hospital, physician, coroner as to time of death? If someone questioned my grandmother's death I would have the mortuary and time of death records to show and her burial plot plus tons of witnesses who viewed her body. Okay, so not everyone goes for that viewing and burial thing but in the U.S. we document births and deaths.
As far as I know there are no documents on either Stanley Ann or Madelyn in a hospital, physicians, burial plot, cremation order, nada. Obama says he threw the ashes over the Pacific. His sister Maya never mentions Obama was there when she threw the ashes in the pacific of their mother.
Maya says Obama was born in two different hospitals so maybe she just forgets a lot.
Just posted on other thread by patriot:
Missing papers:
proof of service, notice of motion with exhibits, proposed order
1,212 posted on Saturday, January 03, 2009 11:47:43 AM by
And the COLB posted on his website that all leftists have used as evidence of his Hawaii birth? The Rathergate-like consequences would unravel the entire fraud named Obama.
what about voter registrations. do they have them for all the states?
I believe there could be something to the rumor about Boeing suspecting Dad of espionage.
Mom works at a bank, and dad suddenly decides to go to Hawaii to sell furniture...but maybe he was sent there because of the communists there.
I just can’t believe Obama , the black hole, is going to be our President.
http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a032108clintonpassport
back then, we didn’t recognize the significance of what might have been in those passport files
ROTFLMAO....the posters moniker is one of truth indeed.
I am not saying Obama’s mother couldnt be alive. What I am saying is that you can’t base it on a search on Intellius and that is what the original writer of the story did by saying her social security number was active on Intellius.
for those who don’t speak Spanish, the names of the towns “Palo Cagao” and “Pinga Dura” are dirty jokes, not real places.
________________________________________________________
Use your head. How, in 1961, did one travel from Kenya to Hawaii? There is no commercial aircraft flying today that could make the trip non-stop. This means an alternate "POE" into the US.
By cruise ship? What cruise line has a Honolulu - Mombassa route?
The vaunted divorce decree does nothing but prove that bambi's were in fact married in Hawaii before he was born.
I don’t see what you are talking about.
here is Indiana
They voted for Obama
http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/2008-certificates/vote-indiana-01.html
Thanks. I was willing to run the searcg but you sent me a link anyway.
FReepers are the best!
Nor did they have pamper available in Africa....Think of the luggage she would have had just to carry enough diapers....
I repeat she could NOT have traveled by herself. Would her mother have gone with her to meet the in-laws? Would her new husband travel with her?
We may be able to find the information indirectly, if we can find a data base that list the names of port of entries during that time period.
My apology. I should have realized your post was in response to a misguided statement by another.
Right, I saw that as well - except a VP-elect HAS qualified, so this power of Congress is not called into action.
Amendment XII, ratified in 1804, is the source for the candidates from which the House may choose, as follows:
"The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. "
His mother was an American citizen. I know full well that the law in operation at the time did not allow her, due to her age, the right to confer on Obama national-born citizen status if he were born outside the U.S.
Nevertheless, it is a technicality. He is the child of an American citizen and most Americans will not see the difference. And. I assure you, no Court will grant you the difference.
The Supremes have all but spoken in that the EC must determine this. They already did.
This case is closed. No way, no how does Obama get invalidated. Even if you prove to be technically correct with this argument, you will not change the facts on the ground.
The facts on the ground are this: Barack Obama is going to be the next President of the United States and no Democrat Senate will impeach him. His term in office will go to Jan 20, 2013.
Get used to this idea.
Nothing here can or will change that.
His mother was a US citizen, which is enough to give him natural-born status in all but perhaps a purely technical way.”
NATURAL BORN means BORN ON US SOIL. Period.
Naturalized is another category.
This part of the topic has been discussed over and over again on this forum.
Based on the laws on the books of the USA at the time of Stanley Ann’s giving birth to NObama, he is not eligible. She had to be at least 19 years of age by that set of laws, and she was 17 when she got knocked up and 18 when she had NObama.
I am still puzzled how there could be a divorce—following a marriage to a man who already had a wife and 2 kids in Kenya.
If your new “hubby” has his other wife and family in another country, it doesn’ count towards bigamy?????
You are missing the point. That is true, but do you really believe that an elected candidate for POTUS is going to be rejected because of a regulation that was rescinded over 30 years ago and is invalid today, even if it were valid 45 years ago? Especially when, if his mother had been a few years older when he was born, even that old regulation would not have been an issue?
Nice try.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.