Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Importance of the newly located Dunham/Obama Sr divorce decree in proving ineligibility
Restore The Constitutional Republic ^

Posted on 01/03/2009 7:01:24 AM PST by dascallie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 861-874 next last
To: RummyChick
Why did Michelle Obama lie and say his mother was very young and very single when she had him?

Trial balloon to get rid of the inconvenient paternal "British subject at birth" problem? The marriage appears to have been in name only. I don't think I've ever seen a photo of the two together. No evidence that they ever resided together, in HI or elsewhere.

181 posted on 01/03/2009 8:55:44 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Will88
But, if Obama were the child of two foreign nationals, the mother of whom managed to enter the US illegally and have her child in a US hospital at taxpayer expense, well, that baby would be a “natural born citizen” and eligible for all rights due a natural born American citizen, including the right to run for president.

No way, Jose.

You have it very, very wrong.

182 posted on 01/03/2009 8:56:56 AM PST by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

God forbid this guy ever becomes President.

Only 2.5 weeks and that happens.


183 posted on 01/03/2009 8:57:53 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: dascallie

“Another good way to get people to say “oh well, nothing we can do about it” and throw in the towel.”

I contend that the Clintoons never dug into it deep enough because they couldn’t risk alienating both the black-democrat base and the white-guilt democrat base. Those 2 together make up more than half of the Dem votes.

If anything, the Clintoons are risk avoiders, not risk takers.


184 posted on 01/03/2009 8:59:06 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Stanley Ann / Stannie... good one.

I'll do my part and send an e-mail to Ed and Caren Hale with the ‘Stannie’ tip.

What is the significance one way or the other of the beach photo?

Off topic: a site (right side of the web) had a link to Obama’s mum posing in the buff. I swear (pinky swear) that it's her. Of course, it serves no purpose whatsoever (sins of the father/mother) but is indicative of her nature and the company she kept.

185 posted on 01/03/2009 8:59:15 AM PST by freepersup (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Mostly associated with ships. But they have other records. not all records are at Ancestry.com obviously and they continously add info. There is not much info there for Obama. Searched that long ago.


186 posted on 01/03/2009 9:00:27 AM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Hang'emAll

Well, we KNOW they got divorced. Just don’t know where they got married.


187 posted on 01/03/2009 9:00:53 AM PST by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: All
On a completely different note, I can see where Obama gets his big ears from.

Great Great Grandpappy and Grandmammy.

Photobucket

188 posted on 01/03/2009 9:02:24 AM PST by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
You have it very, very wrong.

Like all too many at FR, you make your sweeping generalization and provide nothing more. So, you're saying anchor babies born in the US cannot run for president? What disqualifies them?

189 posted on 01/03/2009 9:03:34 AM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: sevinufnine

We have to wonder if this kind of over-the-top deception would nullify all of BO’s picks.


190 posted on 01/03/2009 9:04:03 AM PST by roamincadillac (Beware Heebee Al-Faqtap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: sneakers

You - are - welcome.

* see post # 162.


191 posted on 01/03/2009 9:04:42 AM PST by freepersup (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: freepersup

beach photo taken by a friend at the time she was suppose to have been pregant..but wasn’t.

However, Obama looks like his grandfather. There are Israeli people that claim Ann wasn’t the mother and the baby was handed over to these people to raise.

Ann abandoned her baby. Obama surely has been traumatized by all the crap that has gone on in his family..and I doubt he even knows the truth.


192 posted on 01/03/2009 9:05:38 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

It’s a pay site, but I have a membership because I am working on my own family tree.

I am researching as much as I can and found alot of information.

Barack’s family tree is online as well.


193 posted on 01/03/2009 9:06:34 AM PST by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44

I think you missed the point of my post, which was in reply to expatguy. I was using the word in the sense it was used in the post to which I was replying.

Expatguy’s use of the word “technical” was meant to minimize and trivialize the Constitutional requirements for eligibility for President. I actually agree with you; these “technicalities” are crucial.


194 posted on 01/03/2009 9:07:01 AM PST by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: svcw
It doesn't.So what? To read the above, by identifying the legal name used by Stanley Ann, it opened up a way to search for other documents she filed. Such as a “port of entry” document.
(never heard of it but I never traveled into the US in the 1960’s with an non citizen)

I always figured if Stanley traveled to Kenya to try and impress her african inlaws with her pregnancy, there was a passport or other record of her leaving and reentering the country. I had also concluded these records for Dunham were stolen and/or altered during last years break-in at the State dept passport files.

195 posted on 01/03/2009 9:07:48 AM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
His mother was a US citizen, which is enough to give him natural-born status in all but perhaps a purely technical way.

Whether correct or not, this is the belief held by millions (if not most) of Americans and probably the main reason why this so-called 'conspiracy' has received a collective "who cares?" among the masses. This is also why even if absolute proof of Kenyan birth is uncovered (something I highly doubt we'll see) there's not going to be millions of Americans marching on Washington over it. No civil war. No Constitutional crisis. Just a collective "so what?"

196 posted on 01/03/2009 9:08:51 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Census documents stop at 1930 because the 1940 census was burned and lost.

1950 is still considered a breach of privacy. So anything after 1930 is gone as far as census.

1957 is the latest for immigration.

There are some links to more current telephone registrations though.


197 posted on 01/03/2009 9:09:17 AM PST by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

“last years break-in at the State dept passport files.”

Is there a FReep post covering this? I missed it...


198 posted on 01/03/2009 9:09:30 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
To: sevinufnine Hmmm ~ so we swap a half-baked Socialist for a guy who had unsuccessful brain surgery three times.

Before or after the aneurysms? lol Okay, not funny. Biden is a joke but just as scary as Obama. They both want new World Order and power globally.

Some Constitutionalists believe that because of Obama's fraud in the election his party would not take office. That Bush would remain until a special election. The reasoning being Biden et al, would know what was going on and be a part of the fraud. We know Pelosi and her ilk is involved since she signed off on OBama's vetting and then refused to show proof to SCOTUS.

My reasoning regardless of who takes over when Obama is imprisoned hopefully, is guarding the Constitution. If we allow this then we will allow future abandoning and destruction of everything in the Constitution. The Shadow party that paid for Obama's election is ready and willing to destroy the Consitution and our lives piece by piece.

199 posted on 01/03/2009 9:09:57 AM PST by MirandaRietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

I haven't checked this out but it is vewwy interesting indeed.

http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd424.htm

Electoral college delegates. Something strange here: "I checked the Official U.S. Electoral College website today to get an idea of the votes that have come in to date. I was prompted to do this after entertaining the following questions on my blog wall from Lisa Karres...Here are a few questions for you:.Currently, Obama only has received 170 electoral votes. The deadline for submitting the votes was last week. Congress will meet on January 8th. Can Congress over-ride the Delegates if they did not give Obama his minimum required of 270? I am told this is the first time in history that many Delegates did NOT report in or submit their votes by the deadline. I have been told that Indiana ALL voted "Present" and cast zero votes. Can SCOTUS over-ride the delegates and just make Obama POTUS?"

200 posted on 01/03/2009 9:09:57 AM PST by MirandaRietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 861-874 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson