Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/12/2008 9:39:44 AM PST by Chet 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Chet 99
"Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything."

- Josef Stalin

2 posted on 12/12/2008 9:40:32 AM PST by Chet 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

Our country has been surrendered to liars and thieves. The outrageous thing is that WE surrendered it when we should have stood up and DEMANDED that the right thing be done. I think that it should begin at the bottom strata, where we live. Is it too late? I’m not sure but it’s going to take a LONG TIME to correct things.


4 posted on 12/12/2008 9:44:50 AM PST by brushcop (We remember SSG Harrison Brown, PVT Andrew Simmons B CO 2/69 3ID KIA Iraq OIF IV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

I wouldn’t be too quick to conclude those absentee ballots will favor Franken. I am not familiar with MN, but normally, absenteee ballots tend to favor Republicans.


10 posted on 12/12/2008 9:51:03 AM PST by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99
Earlier, the Canvassing Board voted unanimously to include the 133 missing ballots from a Minneapolis precinct that voted overwhelmingly for Franken

How do they know how many votes Stuart Smalley got? They must have counted this batch before "they went missing."

11 posted on 12/12/2008 9:52:00 AM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

2008 State Canvassing Board

http://www.sos.state.mn.us/home/index.asp?page=1408

Minnesota Statutes 204C.31, subdivision 2: “The state canvassing board shall consist of the secretary of state, two judges of the supreme court, and two judges of the district court selected by the secretary of state. None of the judges shall be a candidate at the election. If a judge fails to appear at the meeting of the canvassing board, the secretary of state shall fill the vacancy in membership by selecting another judge who is not a candidate at the election. Not more than two judges of the supreme court shall serve on the canvassing board at one time.”

members of the board
http://www.sos.state.mn.us/docs/statewide_general_election_canvassing_board.pdf


13 posted on 12/12/2008 9:53:25 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

Hasn’t Franken stolen this thing yet?


15 posted on 12/12/2008 9:55:47 AM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

define unfair...


16 posted on 12/12/2008 9:57:43 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

What is an ‘unfairly rejected’ ballot? I know what an unlawfully rejected ballot, and what a lawfully accepted ballot is, but I don’t know what fairly and unfairly rejected ballots are.


17 posted on 12/12/2008 10:03:20 AM PST by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

If the democrats persist to the point that franken wins, would that be reasonable grounds to just abolish the senate altogether?


18 posted on 12/12/2008 10:05:26 AM PST by Skid Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

If the democrats persist to the point that franken wins, would that be reasonable grounds to just abolish the senate altogether?


19 posted on 12/12/2008 10:05:51 AM PST by Skid Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

Someone should remove his swinging chad.


20 posted on 12/12/2008 10:09:05 AM PST by Eagle Eye (Libs- If you don't have to play the rules then neither do we...THINK ABOUT IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99
Earlier, the Canvassing Board voted unanimously to include the 133 missing ballots from a Minneapolis precinct that voted overwhelmingly for Franken -- another victory for the Franken camp.

And another victory and another until the tally finally favors Franken. It's a shame, really. We've got senate seats for sale to the highest bidder and any election outcome can be changed to favor Democrats because they know how to grease the wheels. Maybe in the wake of the Blago scandal, Franken should be investigated too. Fitz, you listening? We have a common pattern here.

21 posted on 12/12/2008 10:09:48 AM PST by TheThinker (Shame and guilt mongering is the Left's favorite tool of control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

Was there ever any doubt that the Democrats would do whatever was necessary to steal this seat?

We live in a socialist dictatorship now. This is how it works.


23 posted on 12/12/2008 10:20:48 AM PST by Argus ("From my cold dead hand...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

The dems ought to be right with us in denying this skidmark a seat in the senate. He’s bound to become an embarrassment.


24 posted on 12/12/2008 10:22:33 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

Senator Al Franken.
Senator Al Franken.
Senator Al Franken.

See how easy that is?

Get used to it.
The fix is in.


25 posted on 12/12/2008 10:26:34 AM PST by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

It’s possible that a court would have put the absentee ballots back in anyway, if they truly were rejected improperly.

But the 133 ballot issue is absurd. The whole point of having a “recount” is that you don’t trust the election night count, because someone might have missed counting ballots, or might have counted them twice.

Further, the point of the “recount” is that you PRESUME that a visual inspection of the ballot is better than a machine.

But in this case, where the hand recount showed that 133 ballots were double-counted on election night, instead the canvassing board decides to use the election-night machine count. But they were supposed to only count ballots that could be inspected, and the 133 could not be inspected to reveal voter intent.

If Coleman takes that to court, he probably will win, because it appears case law is on his side.


27 posted on 12/12/2008 10:36:02 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

If Al Franken actually wins this, I will take it as a sure sign that the Apocalypse is nigh.


28 posted on 12/12/2008 10:38:56 AM PST by EternalVigilance ("I did not have political relations with that man........Rod Bluh-goy-avich..." - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

How do you count MISSING BALLOTS???

I am not too bright- so please explain s l o w l y and with s m a l l words.


37 posted on 12/12/2008 1:43:32 PM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

Hey Mini-soda, I have some missing ballots, shall I send them?


38 posted on 12/12/2008 1:48:42 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Obama - not just an empty suit - - A Suit Bomb invading the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson