Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cooper 39, Burr 34 [Senate 2010]
News & Observer Under the Dome ^ | Dec 10, 2008 | Ryan Teague Beckwith

Posted on 12/10/2008 5:55:42 PM PST by MitchellC

The first poll of the 2010 Senate race came out today.

With the dust barely settled on the last race, Democratic firm Public Policy Polling released numbers comparing U.S. Sen. Richard Burr with possible Democratic opponent Attorney General Roy Cooper.

The poll shows a competitive race, with Cooper leading Burr by five points, 39 to 34 percent. It also shows Burr with a 32 percent approval rating, compared to Cooper's 44 percent approval.

"If Attorney General Roy Cooper decides to run for the Senate in 2010, you can put Richard Burr's name right to the top of the list of endangered incumbents nationally," writes pollster Tom Jensen.

He notes that Burr also had much lower approval ratings among Democrats than Cooper did among Republicans.

The poll of 630 North Carolina voters was taken Dec. 8-9. It had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.9 percentage points.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: richardburr; roycooper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: Arizona Carolyn

Barr cost McCain Indiana, too.


21 posted on 12/10/2008 7:53:44 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

You know that is what I heard, but when I went to the individual states to look it up, it looked like McCain still would have lost Indiana, it was close though, 19,243 for Barr and a loss of 25,836 for McCain... at least that is my notes.. People like Barr tick me off, he didn’t have the guts to run in the primary and went in just to act as a spoiler.


22 posted on 12/10/2008 7:58:18 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; Arizona Carolyn

That’s how Democrats win GOP states, with 3rd parties but the vote should never have been that close in the first place.


23 posted on 12/10/2008 7:59:19 PM PST by darkangel82 (I don't have a superiority complex, I'm just better than you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82

I agree with you.. McCain was a horrible candidate, no way around that fact.


24 posted on 12/10/2008 8:02:01 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn

Hmm, I’m looking at Dave Leip’s site and this is how he has it:

Barack H. Obama (D) 1,374,039 49.91%
John S. McCain (R) 1,345,648 48.88%
Bob Barr (L) 29,257 1.06%

Barr appeared, by roughly a thousand votes, to have cost McCain. It’s shocking that McCain even lost at all even with Barr, since the state hadn’t voted Democrat for President since 1964.


25 posted on 12/10/2008 8:05:25 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

Difference is in 2002, Smith couldn’t beat Shaheen, and Sununu could. In 2008, Sununu couldn’t beat Shaheen, but neither would have any other Republican in the entire state, in fact, Sununu was the best chance at winning that seat.


26 posted on 12/10/2008 8:16:47 PM PST by MassachusettsGOP (May the West and Republicans Always Win...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Looking at your numbers that is correct, Barr did cause the loss, the numbers I saw was at CNN.. and you know how reliable they are(n't). They show:

Obama 1,367,503

McCain 1,341,667

I had to look somewhere else for the Barr numbers, so got them off the Libertarian site... I believe your numbers are probably more reliable.

27 posted on 12/10/2008 8:26:34 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

I still can’t believe we lost Dole. She was a staple. This country is shifting and we aren’t on the ball.


28 posted on 12/10/2008 8:46:15 PM PST by Norman Bates (Steele for RNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates
It was her losing to a second tier nobody that was an embarrassment. But let's face facts, Dole was NOT an effective politician. She'd only won one office in her entire life, the one she held. She ran a terrible reelection campaign and thought she could coast to a second term. She found out differently. Never take your reelection for granted, because there is somebody out there that may be hungrier than you to win. The GOP needs better candidates from top to bottom. This was one of the worst years I've ever seen.
29 posted on 12/10/2008 8:57:56 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates

Dole lost for Dole. She ran a horrid campaign. She thought she was a shoo in and when she finally realized she was in a real race, she made one blunder after another. The commercial in which she questioned Kay Hagan’s Christianity
was the final straw. Whe I saw that I turned to my husband and said, “she’s lost the race for certain now, just wait til Hagan gets her church members out there speaking for her”. Sure enough, a commercial was made, a law suit for defamation was filed and Dole lost.

The other problem she had was that she was hardly ever in the state. She is a DC maven and I doubt we will seldom see her here in NC again.


30 posted on 12/10/2008 9:13:49 PM PST by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Ranjit

Ditto what you said on how to organize and motivate, but dont underestimate how hard the dems will work - yes blacks will come out less than this year but i wil l bet it will be in greater numbers than other midterms. also cooper’s good reputation will be hard to overcome.


31 posted on 12/10/2008 9:33:45 PM PST by MitchellC (RINO? GTHO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ranjit
You're right on about NC strategy. I think that in spite of his landslide, the 2008 Obama obsession in an apparition rather than a trend. There were even Republicans who were awed at the opportunity to vote for a person of color--they jumped on the bandwagon wanting to be part of the history of it. Blacks made Herculean efforts unlike anything they've done before--and might not be so energized to do again...and certainly not for a white candidate even if he is a Democrat. Furthermore, there is a real element of white guilt that got expressed this time, but with an economy that isn't percolating, that level of guilt might not be as evident.

2010 is really a long time away. After all, who would have predicted that a market meltdown would have been this election's October surprise?

32 posted on 12/10/2008 10:22:11 PM PST by MHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn

In NC it’s looks like he’d need half the Barr votes to win so yes he’d have gotten that.

He’d need nearly all in Indiana. Some would’ve not voted or voted and I’m sure some would have Gobama-ed (do we make enough words from “Obama” or what?). Some anti-war zealots.


33 posted on 12/11/2008 2:13:23 AM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

“With 424 members, the General Court is the largest state legislature in the United States. The General Court is also the fourth-largest English-speaking legislative body in the world, behind the Parliament of the United Kingdom, the United States Congress, and the Parliament of India[1], and has one of the greatest disparities in size between chambers of a bicameral legislature.”

“If the same level of representation were present in Congress, the U.S. House of Representatives would have approximately 99,000 members according to current population estimates.”

Such a level of representation is only possible in tiny states, I kinda like it. Of course in 2006 so many rats won, many didn’t think they would, they didn’t want the job, they didn’t show up for work.

I noticed 1912 was the last time the rats one the state Senate before 98 Shaheen coattails. I’ve always assumed bull mousers ran candidates for everything that year.


34 posted on 12/11/2008 2:20:07 AM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates

A staple of mediocrity?

The margin was what really hit me.


35 posted on 12/11/2008 2:21:47 AM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; Norman Bates; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; Arizona Carolyn; Ranjit; JohnnyZ

Schuler hasn’t won statewide like Cooper but his alleged conservatism (faux) would be a big problem too cause morons eat that up. Cooper would be stronger though.

Least we’d get his house seat back. The sweetest victories are for rat seats were they lose primaries for higher office. Like Jane Harmon in Cali, course she won it back.

I hate it to say it but, those are strong rats. Burr might needs a anti-dem climate. In an even steven year/turnout slugfest Burr looks like a loser on paper.


36 posted on 12/11/2008 2:30:13 AM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Impy; Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj
Yes, 424 members, but apparently no one is interested in grooming ANY of them for higher office. According to the NHGOP (and some freepers!) the ONLY "electable" Republican candidates in the entire state of NH who need apply for federal office are spoiled politician's kids. 2 out of 3 of those "electable" candidates are now gone, and the lone remaining one (Senator Judd Gregg, who's main qualification for statewide office is that his dad was Governor) looks vunerable in 2010. But oh well, let's just keep running those blue blooded elites from the old guard over and over again, and hope it works out next time.

The mindset of the NH GOP kind of reminds me of the IL DEMS. No downstate Dem need apply, because all the statewide slots are received for politicians kids from Chicago. That kind of arrogance caused the NH GOP to begin imploding in 2002, and it looks like it may have finally caught up with the IL DEMS now too.

37 posted on 12/11/2008 2:47:31 AM PST by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Impy
Least we’d get [Shuler's] house seat back.

Uhhh, don't be so sure about that. The 11th District seems to be in shambles and they tend to elect Democrats for all the local stuff. They purportedly have a number of strong Dems waiting to take over after Shuler. I'm not sure the GOP has anyone strong at all.

And I'm not sure that the party out there has any idea when it comes to nominating a candidate. This year's candidate, Carl Mumpower, ran a campaign that was arguably worse than Katherine Harris' run for the Senate.
38 posted on 12/11/2008 4:16:10 AM PST by MitchellC (RINO? GTHO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Ranjit

Recall that McCain was up by double digits in two different polls from two different groups after the convention, then PPP started with their string of polls that suddenly showed a tight race. In fairness however, their last poll was pretty close to the results, and other pollsters, including the conservative Civitas Institute, were showing the same numbers as PPP along the way.

The only thing I’d question is the sudden drop that PPP showed directly after McCain showed a big lead.

What is it that convinces you that Jensen had some part in Obama’s moving his resources from GA to NC?


39 posted on 12/11/2008 4:25:41 AM PST by MitchellC (RINO? GTHO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

“Barr cost McCain Indiana, too.”

In an interesting twist, Obama supporters claim that Ralph Nader tipped Missouri to McCain.


40 posted on 12/11/2008 9:57:26 AM PST by Clintonfatigued (If Islam conquers the world, the Earth will be at peace because the human race will be killed off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson