Posted on 12/08/2008 7:12:24 AM PST by cycle of discernment
too bad
It's not proof of anything. Even if it were real, which is highly doubtful, such documents are held by folks who weren't born in Hawaii or the US.
Is the copy that Obama made public legitimate? I don’t know.
That's the whole point. No one knows.
But a Hawaiian court has ruled that it is, whether you think that’s right or wrong.
Now you're just making stuff up.
“Are you a scotus expert?”
since this morning.
scotusexpert
Since Dec 8, 2008
Total BS.
Fast learner.
OK.
Obama may not have been rich, but Stanley’s parents were not poor.
[click]
[read read read] What the...
OMG! You gotta read this! (And I almost never make such a post!)
Folks, this whole issue has just gotten a LOT more interesting.
Upshot: we've been here before. This isn't the first time the USA had a non-qualified President, who historical research is showing actively suppressed disqualifying evidence while dragging around his birth certificate as a red herring.
My mistake, that should have gone to whoever you responded to.
Like so many with the new sign on dates.
Who even knows if the justices read FR? But if everyone who posts here would stop what they’re doing and pen a brief letter and mail it to each of the nine justices, maybe they’d know we’re not happy.
Can you update us when you have a hearing date for the Keyes case? Do you have a ping list? If so please add me.
~belle~
Care to explain what you mean by "anymore" seeing as you signed up today?
This sort of think will not work which is why talk radio won’t touch it.
::::::::::
I certainly understand your point. But beyond that, if the rule of law, especially Constitutional law, has become politically “selectable” in its application, and the American citizen no longer has the right to demand support for its Constitution, we are finished as a nation of laws.
The law cannot be optional in a society based in law. There can be no shades of gray. And if we cannot count on the highest court in the land to do its sworn job, UNBIASED and independent of politics, we are no longer a nation based in law. That was my point.
You can’t influence SCOTUS, they pride themselves on being above the political fray.
That’s quite alright.
I’m completely calm now.
Really? When in the hell did that happen? When did a Hawaiian court rule on anything regarding this issue?
Yes. And several cases, not all, listed under that section, ‘Cases Pending’, give direction as to what the petitioner can do relating to a portion of their case. Donofrio’s ‘Petition for Writ of Certiorari’ was not denied. Look below under ‘Certiorari Denied’. Donofrio is not listed. It looks to me like they denied a portion of the relief he requested. The stay he asked for concerning the SOS giving the electoral votes to BO was denied. The Writ, the re-examination of the lower court ruling was not denied.
I believe that the Obama non-citizenship case from California and Alan Keyes has much more meat on it. Keyes was actually one of the candidates. It is supposed to be filed with SCOTUS today.
http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244
Holiday Inn Express has been doing great business lately.
Thank you for your civil reply. Not that I expected any less from you.
This man has shrouded his past deliberately, two hagiographic books by him notwithstanding.
This should have been a SIMPLE matter to resolve. Release the necessary documentation and it is over and done with.
People are treating this as if the burden of proof is on all of US as American citizens to prove he is NOT a citizen, when in actuality, the burden of proof his on HIM to show he is eligible for office as described in the Constitution.
It is the job of the GOVERNMENT to assess the legitimacy of citizenship. Our government failed us in this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.