Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Particle Physics Is Remarkably Consistent with Genesis
ICR ^ | December 2008 | Brian Thomas, M.S.

Posted on 12/05/2008 9:02:48 AM PST by GodGunsGuts

Aided by a supercomputer, an international team of theoretical physicists has recently performed a massive computation that confirmed Einstein’s famous formula E=mc2, which states that matter and energy interconvert. Their research appears in the November 21, 2008, edition of the journal Science.

The study set out to provide a stronger theoretical basis for the Standard Model of particle physics. Part of this model holds that the protons and neutrons inside atomic nuclei are made of quarks and gluons, which are theoretical particles of energy. The researchers’ quantitative calculations agreed very closely with the experimental observations that “more than 99 percent of the mass of ordinary matter comes from protons and neutrons, and in turn about 95 percent of their mass comes from this confined energy.”1

Perhaps it is yet unknown what “confines” the energy, which thus produces mass, but this phenomenon seems consistent with ICR founder Dr. Henry M. Morris’ commentary on Genesis 1:2:

"The 'Spirit' (Hebrew ruach) of 'God' (Elohim) proceeded to 'move upon the face of the waters' (literally, 'vibrate in the presence of the waters'). Waves of gravitational energy and waves of electro-magnetic energy began to pulse forth from the great 'Breath' (another meaning of ruach) of God, the Prime Mover of the universe. The unformed 'earth' material (Hebrew eretz), as well as the 'waters' permeating it (Hebrew shamayim) quickly coalesced into spherical form under the new force of gravity, and the first material body (Planet Earth) had been formed at a point in space."2

Several points can be drawn from the biblical account of creation. Matter exists apart from God, as Genesis directly implies. Matter is not currently being created (just as the First Law of Thermodynamics states), since God ceased creative work on the seventh day.3 And with this new study, scientists seem to have strong evidence that matter is made of energy, even as God energized His creation as recorded in Genesis 1:2. If indeed the Spirit of the Creator was emanating vibrating energy into the primeval universe, then perhaps the material of the universe still consists of that energy.

The investigation of the structure of matter is a valid pursuit within the creationist worldview, and so far no information gleaned from this pursuit has shown anything but concurrence with the Word of the Maker.

References

(1) Dürr, S. et al. 2008. Ab Initio Determination of Light Hadron Masses. Science. 322 (5905): 1224-1227.

(2) Morris, H. 2006. The New Defender’s Study Bible. Nashville, TN: World Publishing, 8.

(3) Genesis 2:1-2.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: creation; einstein; evolution; intelligentdesign; scientism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 12/05/2008 9:02:49 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

I’m not saying that physics and religion should be compared... but many Physicists I know are very spiritual people.


2 posted on 12/05/2008 9:06:20 AM PST by babubabu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

and that says something, because physics is the purest science.


3 posted on 12/05/2008 9:07:09 AM PST by babubabu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
...and so far no information gleaned from this pursuit has shown anything but concurrence with the Word of the Maker

Especially when you can interpret the vague statements in Genesis any which way you like. Amazing!

4 posted on 12/05/2008 9:13:12 AM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

I’m confused. Is godless science good or bad?


5 posted on 12/05/2008 9:18:03 AM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babubabu
I don't blame them. My friend was an avowed Ayn Rand objectivist (read: confirmed atheist, and militantly so). He was doing his graduate work in epigenetics on a full-ride scholarship at UC Berkeley. I used to debate with him re: creation for hours on end over the telephone. I couldn't even make a dent. And then one day, he called me up and told me that his graduate work convinced him that there had to be an intelligent designer. I was shocked. A number of years later, he finally became a Young Earth Creationist. I would like to think I had something to do with it, but I really didn't. He arrived at this conclusion all on his own (unless you count my prayers!).
6 posted on 12/05/2008 9:18:12 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
Great book on the topic
7 posted on 12/05/2008 9:22:02 AM PST by Troll_House_Cookies (Ironically, Chancellor Obama's first re-education camp will be in Alaska.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

bump for later read


8 posted on 12/05/2008 9:22:45 AM PST by Captain Beyond (The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

self-ping


9 posted on 12/05/2008 9:25:44 AM PST by shibumi (...so if it's organic, where are its organs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Troll_House_Cookies

I need to get that book out and dust it off. I bought it some time ago before I got seriously interested in creation cosmology. You are the second person to remind me that I have this book. Thank you!


10 posted on 12/05/2008 9:26:24 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
"of 'God' (Elohim)"

Elohim is plural and means "gods", not "God"

11 posted on 12/05/2008 9:27:14 AM PST by Soliton (This 2 shall pass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soliton

It is also used in the singular.


12 posted on 12/05/2008 9:30:41 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
It is also used in the singular.

Only in the case of the Bible because it conflicts with the One God Hypothesis. In Hebrew it is plural. Christians normally explain it away as the Trinity. Mormons think it refers to the head god, Jews just kind of skim over it and say that the suffix is plural everywhere else but the Torah.

13 posted on 12/05/2008 9:33:43 AM PST by Soliton (This 2 shall pass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Much of scientific discovery today leads to at least the possibility of a God. When scientists see only the opposite it is the result of their prejudice.


14 posted on 12/05/2008 9:40:15 AM PST by Williams (It's The Policies, Stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soliton; GodGunsGuts
Only in the case of the Bible because it conflicts with the One God Hypothesis.

And because we are discussing the contents of the Bible, where is the problem? Or don't you believe that Elohim in this reference is the One True God?

15 posted on 12/05/2008 9:48:52 AM PST by 1forall (America - my home, my land, my country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Soliton
...Jews just kind of skim over it...

It is an idiom technically referred to a plural of exaltation! I personally see the trinitarian implication.

16 posted on 12/05/2008 9:49:50 AM PST by DaveyB (Those who are merciful to the cruel will be cruel to the merciful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: babubabu
One of the most interesting things in physics, that I as a totally non-physics person have heard of, is the idea of variance (or expansion?) of the speed of light--assumed to be a constant in the past. If the speed of light has changed, than all bets are off over time as well...and creation in 6 literal days is actually imaginable.

Also, even when assuming the speed of light as a constant, Einstein's relativity principle puts the passage of time as relative to the observer....and the faster an observer is, the slower time will pass for him.

So, without violating any known laws of physics, it actually is possible for 14 Billion years (the guesstimated age of the Universe) to pass, and for an observer traveling at near the speed of light--6 literal 24-hour days to pass...

God is light; in Him there is no darkness at all. (I John 1:5)

17 posted on 12/05/2008 9:50:23 AM PST by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Soliton

Father, Son, Holy Spirit = God in much the same way as the exutive, legislative, judicial = the federal government.


18 posted on 12/05/2008 9:55:03 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
since God ceased creative work on the seventh day.

Not to put too fine a point on it.

Elohim ceased creative work by the end of the sixth day.

Gen 2:1 Thus the heavens and the earth were completed, and all their hosts.

Gen 2:2 By the seventh day God completed His work which He had done, and He rested on the seventh day from all His work which He had done.

shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach Adonai

19 posted on 12/05/2008 9:57:09 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 78:35 And they remembered that God was their ROCK, And the Most High God their Redeemer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babubabu
"... but many Physicists I know are very spiritual people."

"The Tao of Physics" was a great book that I read while I was searching - since then I have become a Christian and can easily recognise the truth of physics in Genesis thanks to that book.

20 posted on 12/05/2008 10:03:06 AM PST by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson