Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/04/2008 1:22:52 PM PST by radar101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: radar101

Here are just some of the “highlights” of the Wilson Research Strategies poll of 1,000 voters whose demographic breakdown was an exact replica of the total voting population and whose results totally vindicate the controversial Zogby poll:

35 % of McCain voters got 10 or more of 13 multiple choice questions correct.
18% of Obama voters got 10 or more of 13 questions correct.
McCain voters knew which party controls congress by a 63-27 margin.
Obama voters got the “congressional control” question wrong by 43-41.
Those that got “congressional control” correct voted 56-43 for McCain.
Those that got “congressional control” wrong voted 65-35 for Obama.
Those “exposed” to FOX News got “congressional control” correct 64-25 (+39)
Those ‘exposed” to CNN got “Congressional control” correct 48-38 (+10)
Those “exposed” to network news got “Congressional control” correct 48-39 (+9)
Those “exposed” to print media got “Congressional control” correct 52-37 (+15)
Those “exposed” to MSNBC got “Congressional control” correct 55-35 (+20)
Those “exposed” to talk radio got “Congressional control” correct 61-29 (+32)
Voters in the South had the best response rate on “Congressional control” (+22)
Voters in the Northeast had the worst response rate on “Congressional control” (+9)
Those “exposed” to FOX News voted 70-29 for McCain.
Those “exposed” to CNN voted 63-37 for Obama.
Those “exposed” to MSNBC voted 73-26 for Obama.
Those “exposed” to network newscasts voted 62-37 for Obama.
Those “exposed” to national newspapers voted 64-36 for Obama
Those “exposed” to talk radio voted 61-38 for McCain.
Those that could associate Bill Ayers’ name/story with Obama voted 52-48 for McCain.
Those that knew Obama had made negative comments about “coal power plants” voted 76-24 for McCain.
Those that knew Obama had his opponents knocked off the ballot in his first campaign voted 66-34 for McCain.
McCain voters did poorly (only 42% correct) on the Keating question and, in general, the voters did universally worse on questions where the negative information was about their candidate.
Women under 55 did worse than they might have by guessing on four of the thirteen questions yet 95% of them knew that Palin was the candidate with a pregnant teenage daughter. — Even 95% of those in this demographic group who didn’t know “Congressional control” got this question correct.
Those “exposed” to MSNBC scored 90% correct on the three Palin questions (including an incredible 98% on the pregnant teenage daughter question), while those not exposed to MSNBC averaged 84% correct on those three questions.


2 posted on 12/04/2008 1:23:28 PM PST by radar101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

Here are just some of the “highlights” of the Wilson Research Strategies poll of 1,000 voters whose demographic breakdown was an exact replica of the total voting population and whose results totally vindicate the controversial Zogby poll:

35 % of McCain voters got 10 or more of 13 multiple choice questions correct.
18% of Obama voters got 10 or more of 13 questions correct.
McCain voters knew which party controls congress by a 63-27 margin.
Obama voters got the “congressional control” question wrong by 43-41.
Those that got “congressional control” correct voted 56-43 for McCain.
Those that got “congressional control” wrong voted 65-35 for Obama.
Those “exposed” to FOX News got “congressional control” correct 64-25 (+39)
Those ‘exposed” to CNN got “Congressional control” correct 48-38 (+10)
Those “exposed” to network news got “Congressional control” correct 48-39 (+9)
Those “exposed” to print media got “Congressional control” correct 52-37 (+15)
Those “exposed” to MSNBC got “Congressional control” correct 55-35 (+20)
Those “exposed” to talk radio got “Congressional control” correct 61-29 (+32)
Voters in the South had the best response rate on “Congressional control” (+22)
Voters in the Northeast had the worst response rate on “Congressional control” (+9)
Those “exposed” to FOX News voted 70-29 for McCain.
Those “exposed” to CNN voted 63-37 for Obama.
Those “exposed” to MSNBC voted 73-26 for Obama.
Those “exposed” to network newscasts voted 62-37 for Obama.
Those “exposed” to national newspapers voted 64-36 for Obama
Those “exposed” to talk radio voted 61-38 for McCain.
Those that could associate Bill Ayers’ name/story with Obama voted 52-48 for McCain.
Those that knew Obama had made negative comments about “coal power plants” voted 76-24 for McCain.
Those that knew Obama had his opponents knocked off the ballot in his first campaign voted 66-34 for McCain.
McCain voters did poorly (only 42% correct) on the Keating question and, in general, the voters did universally worse on questions where the negative information was about their candidate.
Women under 55 did worse than they might have by guessing on four of the thirteen questions yet 95% of them knew that Palin was the candidate with a pregnant teenage daughter. — Even 95% of those in this demographic group who didn’t know “Congressional control” got this question correct.
Those “exposed” to MSNBC scored 90% correct on the three Palin questions (including an incredible 98% on the pregnant teenage daughter question), while those not exposed to MSNBC averaged 84% correct on those three questions.


3 posted on 12/04/2008 1:23:51 PM PST by radar101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

Because it exposes the depth and breadth of their ignorance AND their stupidity, that is why...


4 posted on 12/04/2008 1:25:46 PM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

I would argue one little beef with this. It isn’t really a poll but an analysis as it is a study after the fact.


5 posted on 12/04/2008 1:26:36 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

Threated???


8 posted on 12/04/2008 1:28:49 PM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

Answer: Because liberalism truly is a mental illness. If we are not careful we too will contract our own insanity. Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. John should know or maybe he is learning. You can not reason with liberals. Facts, surveys, polls, the people’s rule through winning elections do not matter if they contradict or in anyway challenge their own thinking, feeling, or philosophy. It is like trying to get a psychopath to feel empathy for those he murders. Not going to happen.


9 posted on 12/04/2008 1:29:24 PM PST by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101
Threated

Threated???

10 posted on 12/04/2008 1:30:24 PM PST by TomServo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

It is astonishing that a man was elected to the Presidency based on the cost of the wardrobe of his opponent’s Vice Presidential nominee.


13 posted on 12/04/2008 1:32:27 PM PST by gridlock (QUESTION AUTHORITY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

Mr. Ziegler, welcome to the world of liberalism. They don’t attack the message, but rather the messenger, because they can’t defend the message. If they marginalize the messenger, then it weakens the message in the eyes of the public.


15 posted on 12/04/2008 1:32:48 PM PST by murron (Proud Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

Why is the Left threatened? That’s easy. The Left believes that they are the most intelligent people in the World. Therefore, they should rule. The poll threatens their entire self-image and worldview.


17 posted on 12/04/2008 1:34:06 PM PST by popdonnelly (Don't lose sight of your conservative principles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

ping for later


22 posted on 12/04/2008 1:39:19 PM PST by sickoflibs (Obama says: "I only need to buy 40% of voters with handouts and trick another 11%")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101
[Among] Women under 55 . . . 95% of them knew that Palin was the candidate with a pregnant teenage daughter.

Yes, these were the ones "exposed" to Entertainment Tonight and Access Hollywood.

23 posted on 12/04/2008 1:39:44 PM PST by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

This is one of many:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zl0WwC9OcOI&feature=related


26 posted on 12/04/2008 1:51:17 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (Reagan is back, and this time he's a woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

The pollster can’t possibly be serious about his question.

Hasn’t he been aware of the blind allegiance to O and the absolute hatred to anyone who doesn’t get that tingle down their leg.

It’s disingenuous to ask the question.


27 posted on 12/04/2008 1:58:00 PM PST by Carley (Prayers for Sgt. Eddie Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101; Fred Nerks; SatinDoll; LucyT
Wait until the electorate discover the MSM lied on cogent facts about Obama.

Americans do not like to be called "Dumb and Dumber"

Never again will the MSM be trusted.

Printed News has tanked already. Soon TV news and associated programs will tank as well.

TV programming will become a relic handed over to the sports channels.

About time, too!

34 posted on 12/04/2008 3:31:54 PM PST by Candor7 (Fascism? All it takes is for good men to say nothing, ( member NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

This shows that Republicans need to spend a little time educating fellow Republicans, and it shows that leftnuts can’t be educated, but the right slogans might work on them. Keep it simple.


35 posted on 12/04/2008 3:46:43 PM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite1984; rmlew; Yehuda; neverdem; firebrand; Clemenza

ping


36 posted on 12/04/2008 4:26:47 PM PST by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson