FreedomMarch.org - Supreme Court Vigil Friday Dec 5, 2008 8:00 AM

FreedomMarch.org ^ | 12/4/2008 | Joe THunder

[Beckwith]

A peaceful and dignified public "Vigil" is planned for 8:00 AM, Dec 5, 2008, at the Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C. The purpose of the vigil is as follows:

Support the Constitution

Support the Supreme Court Justices

End mainstream media silence on this vital issue.

FReepers are welcome and are encouraged to attend.

[LucyT]

It’s quite the photo, isn’t it.

There are thirty-three or thirty-four pairs of eyes, depending on whether the eyes shown at 2 o’clock belong to one or two cats.

[Steve Schulin]

It was a beautiful morning in DC, and the fellowship amongst those who came to the vigil was uplifting in many ways. I'm a plaintiff in one of the cases filed in Federal court before the election, and got to meet one of my fellow plaintiffs there this morning. We have talked on the phone and exchanged emails over recent months about building a new political home for God-fearing, liberty-loving, sovereignty-conserving folks, and about these 'natural born' lawsuits. Today we got to shake hands and talk eye-to-eye. Some details and photos are posted at AIPnews. It reminded me of the spirit at the first FreeRepublic rally, during Clinton impeachment -- the March for Justice -- on The Mall here in DC.

[Iowan]

LucyT

Many thanks for that photo!

The kitty looks so innocent but we can see the evidence.

I needed that laugh.

Ping

[LucyT]

[Iowan]

Thanks for the photo, LucyT

MEOW Ping

Stay strong for the Constitution.

LOL!

[seekthetruth]

Thanks so much for sharing and thanks for being there for those who could not join you. We must trust that the Supreme Court Justices will uphold our Constitution. I am listening to Leo now on Plains Radio, and I remain in prayer and optimism for the news that comes Monday. :)

[Frantzie]

IS your case about Obama’s eligibility?

[Frantzie]

Any new news on this?

[Steve Schulin]

My case includes Obama’s eligibility, but was filed before the election, and called on the state to ensure that all the presidential candidates on the ballot met the Constitutional requirements to serve.