Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FCC Probe Signals Democratic Attack Machine (DOD-military analysts on airwaves-UNREAL!)
Human Events ^ | 10-30-08 | Rowan Scarborough

Posted on 10/30/2008 8:24:28 AM PDT by STARWISE

A Federal Communications Commission investigation of on-air military analysts is providing a glimpse of what Democrats and an Obama administration will do to critics once they capture Washington.

The FCC has sent letters to some of the nation's most prominent military analysts -- some of them pro-President Bush and pro-war -- suggesting they may have broken the law when they appeared on television stations to comment on and explain the war on terrorism.

The FCC investigation raises the question of whether a Democrat-controlled Congress and White House next year will investigate -- and perhaps criminalize -- all sorts of actions taken by the Bush administration. Obama is leading in all presidential polls, while Democrats are set to greatly increase their hold on the House and Senate.

The FCC letters came at the behest of two House Democrats, who say the analysts parroted on air the private briefings they received at the Pentagon. This may have broken the law, the lawmakers said.

The probe is sending chills through the ranks of military commentators, some of them decorated war heroes who share their expertise with millions of lay viewers. They see it as one in a series of moves the Left is making to intimidate and shut up its critics.

"We are seeing the dawn of a new era of the current Democratic leadership trying to muzzle free speech and the First Amendment," retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Tom McInerney, a Fox News analyst, told HUMAN EVENTS. "It may be the most invasive intrusion that we have seen in our history. There will be more of these tactics to follow."

Said retired Army Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely, one of Fox's first defense analysts, "It's an affront to freedom of speech. As retired officers, we're private citizens and can say anything we want under the First Amendment. The whole thing was to explain to the American people what was going on in war and analyzing it."

Democrats have more in store to try to muzzle conservatives. They talk of reactivating the so-called Fairness Doctrine in which federal government bureaucrats monitor radio and TV programs and rule on their fairness. Conservatives say the real goal is to kill right-leaning talk radio.

Talk radio is the one medium conservatives can turn to for their point of view amid a sea of liberal dogma from the New York Times, Washington Post, Public Broadcasting, the TV networks and Hollywood. If the government forces Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity to present liberal points of view, ratings will slip and the shows might be taken off the air.

"They're going to implement the Fairness Doctrine to basically do away with Right-wing radio," Vallely said. "In their minds, balance means Left wing. It's Socialists trying to infringe on our First Amendment rights."

Begun in 1949 as an FCC policy and then a regulation, the agency abolished the doctrine during the Ronald Reagan administration as an infringement on free speech. Democrats passed a bill to reinstate the policy as law, but Reagan vetoed it. There would be no Reagan to veto the next bill Democrats are likely to enact should Obama win the election.

In the analysts case, the FCC is looking at the practice of the Pentagon providing exclusive briefings on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to retired military officers, who would then use the information on the air.

In the Oct. 2 letters to 19 analysts and various TV networks, the FCC cited a New York Times article which accused the analysts of receiving the Pentagon information in exchange for positive commentary on the air. The letters, signed by Hillary S. DeNigro, chief of the agency's investigations and hearings division, said such an arrangement might violate the Communications Act of 1934.

The FCC sent the letters after receiving a complaint from Rep. Rosa L. DeLauro, (D-Conn.) and Rep. John Dingell, (D-Mich.). Dingell has a history of using committee staff to browbeat and investigate Republican administrations.

"In their complaint, Representatives DeLauro and Dingell express concern that the analysts and [TV stations] may have failed to disclose this exchange of consideration to the stations, as required by section 507 of the Communications Act of 1934," said the FCC letter. "They also suggest that the stations may have aired your commentary without making appropriate sponsorship identification announcements at the time such material was aired, as required" by the act.

Some analysts also work for defense contractors who produce weapons systems used in the war. There were suggestions in the Times article that analysts pitched those systems during TV appearances.

McInerney, a hawk on the Iraq war, said the information the Pentagon supplied him and other commentators was the same as provided to the news media.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates has ended the private analysts briefings. Besides the FCC probe, the Pentagon inspector general is reviewing the program, which was started by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld after the September 1, 2001 attacks.

The DeLauro-Dingell letter to the FCC says, in part, "Our chief concern is that as a result of the analysts' participation in this DoD program, which included the DoD's paying for their commercial airfare on DoD-sponsored trips to Iraq, the analysts and the networks that hired them could have run afoul of certain laws or regulations."

The FCC is giving the 19 analysts 30 days to respond to the charges. [HUMAN EVENTS Editor Jed Babbin was a member of the group of military analysts who met frequently with senior Pentagon officials and participated in the program. He did not receive a letter from the FCC.]


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; antichrist; brownshirtsforobama; conspiracy; democratparty; democrats; digg; dingell; dlauro; dod; electionpresident; elections; fairnessdoctrine; fcc; firstamendment; freespeech; hypnosis; military; nobama; nobama08; obama; obamatruthfile; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last
To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick

Long before that happens I expect to see a Coup d’Etat. After all, the military oath, one I took and still abide by, is to:

PRESERVE AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, AGAINST ALL ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC.

Note that it doesn’t say preserve and defend Congress, Rep’s DeLauro or Dingle, or Senator Obama, or the democratic party.

At some point, Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines are going to have to decide what this part of their oath means, as the Constitution is torn to pieces.


61 posted on 10/30/2008 10:11:28 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington

BTTT!!!!!!


62 posted on 10/30/2008 10:16:52 AM PDT by afnamvet (COUNTRY FIRST! McCain / Palin 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

I believe we will all have to stand up and fight for our Constitution. The libs do not give a crap about it, so we must defeat them.


63 posted on 10/30/2008 10:17:02 AM PDT by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (You cannot help the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer. - Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

This would help ensure that the public only heard what the administration wanted them to hear about military and international matter.


64 posted on 10/30/2008 10:26:42 AM PDT by prairiebreeze ( Our troops DESERVE BETTER than Barack Hussein Obama!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Thanks for the ping!


65 posted on 10/30/2008 10:30:45 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington
So shockingly, grievously so.

At the close of the Constitutional Convention, a woman asked Benjamin Franklin what type of government the Constitution was bringing into existence. Franklin replied, “A republic, if you can keep it."

66 posted on 10/30/2008 10:31:23 AM PDT by STARWISE (They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

Comment #67 Removed by Moderator

To: STARWISE

The last time I checked President Bush was still in charge of the Executive branch of which the FCC is part.

Another glimpse at how both the major parties are looking to screw over the American people.


68 posted on 10/30/2008 10:37:25 AM PDT by ksen (Don't steal. The government hates the competition. - sign on Ron Paul's desk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Are the Dems LOOKING to pick a FIGHT with the DOD?


69 posted on 10/30/2008 10:41:20 AM PDT by Biggirl (Throw The Bums OUT!=^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: myself6
Good for you!

The sniveling is driving me crazy.

70 posted on 10/30/2008 10:43:05 AM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington

I have to imagine that some active duty military (officer and enlisted) WILL be on our side. But if they intend to wait too long they will have ben replaced with people loyal to the marxists. People like Wesly Clark...

WE just need to convince them that its about time to fulfill their oaths and defend the constitution against domestic enemies.


71 posted on 10/30/2008 10:45:17 AM PDT by myself6 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington

Since the majority of the military are conservitive, they will not put up with any crap coming from any political mischief makers.


72 posted on 10/30/2008 10:47:34 AM PDT by Biggirl (Throw The Bums OUT!=^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl; All
The FCC is giving the 19 analysts 30 days to respond to the charges. [HUMAN EVENTS Editor Jed Babbin was a member of the group of military analysts who met frequently with senior Pentagon officials and participated in the program. He did not receive a letter from the FCC.]

73 posted on 10/30/2008 10:49:58 AM PDT by STARWISE (They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: myself6

So I’d like to hear what direct actions that you are now taking to counter the Marxists. Please give us some examples so that we can have an idea of what you think is appropriate.


74 posted on 10/30/2008 11:01:28 AM PDT by thecabal (I AM JOE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
"..The FCC sent the letters after receiving a complaint from Rep. Rosa L. DeLauro, (D-Conn.) and Rep. John Dingell, (D-Mich.). Dingell has a history of using committee staff to browbeat and investigate Republican administrations..."

The above are the two Dems. DeLauro I never heard of, but Dingell has been in the House forever.

75 posted on 10/30/2008 11:01:37 AM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Exactly.


76 posted on 10/30/2008 11:01:51 AM PDT by iThinkBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

They can fight for their country but they can’t have a voice? Truly frigthening. VOTE McCAIN!!!!!!


77 posted on 10/30/2008 11:03:37 AM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
Bet you've seen her:

Very strident lib.

78 posted on 10/30/2008 11:09:09 AM PDT by STARWISE (They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

I’m guessing that General Wesley “Ashley” Clark did not get a letter.


79 posted on 10/30/2008 11:10:55 AM PDT by NavVet ( If you don't defend Conservatism in the Primaries, you won't have it to defend in November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Yeech!!!


80 posted on 10/30/2008 11:12:28 AM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson