Ayers.
Posted on 10/25/2008 11:27:02 PM PDT by jasonmyos
WASHINGTON (Legal Newsline)-The former deputy Pennsylvania attorney general who challenged Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama's qualifications to be president has appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Lafayette Hill, Pa.-based attorney Philip Berg, a self-described "moderate to liberal" Democrat who supported Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign, alleged that the Illinois senator is not a U.S. citizen and therefore ineligible for the presidency.
He had his lawsuit rejected Friday by U.S. District Judge Richard Barclay Surrick of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
(Excerpt) Read more at legalnewsline.com ...
Ayers.
ping
Why sure! Make sure you write us from re-education camp!
/not sure if I'm joking
"Welcome to Camp Obama"
The above two sentences should be made into a commercial....So?....Why hasn't the RNC or one of the PACs done this? I am sitting here scratching my head wondering.
He'll certainly be the Affirmative Action President.
Think about it for a minute. He couldn't have gotten into Harvard if it weren't for Affirmative Action. If he hadn't have gotten into Harvard, would he be a Presidential Candidate today? Don't think so. He'd be stuck in ACORN Community Organizer hell.
“It seems that Judge R. Barclay Surrick decided to cover his butt in getting rid of the Berg v Obama fraud case in a 34 page statement which concluded that the Constitution gives citizens, political parties or voters no jurisdiction over policing if someone qualifies for the presidency.”
**Not my quote just using for explanation purposes”
Well then who does?
This Iraq veteran feels he earned at least this much!
>>>Here’s one way to note the bias of the media: They call it a citizenship question when it’s an eligibility question based upon whether he’s natural born.
That is exactly how the responses started when we all first started posting about the birth certificate issue here at FR. We all had to go round and round each time to explain the difference between natural born vs. naturalized.
If Obama were honest, he would just turn over his COLB to a judge that asked for it. Since he doesn’t, he is admitting he is dishonest.
Our fellow FReeprer at ‘The Obama File’,
http://theobamafile.com/ObamaIslam.htm, makes a request:
“What is Obama hiding?
This question needs to go viral — use the link
http://www.conservativeusa.org/megalink.htm
and write a couple of emails — take a minute:
What is Senator Obama hiding? Why the lawyers? If Obama is eligible to occupy the Office of the President of the United States of America, let him present the vault copy of his birth certificate to prove it and end all the speculation.
E-Mail addresses for your elected representatives, talk shows, the media, and even write letters to the editor — email your friends — comment at your favorite blogs and forums — demand an answer!”
Sounds like a good idea to me!
well which Supreme is the one that reviews this.
it is not about the law, it is about who is the judge.
It wasn’t a birth certificate. I’ll bet you that his college records have him as an Indonesian Citizen. How do you go to fancy private colleges for free? Come from a third world country.
It wasn’t a birth certificate. I’ll bet you that his college records have him as an Indonesian Citizen. How do you go to fancy private colleges for free? Come from a third world country.
It wasn’t a birth certificate. I’ll bet you that his college records have him as an Indonesian Citizen. How do you go to fancy private colleges for free? Come from a third world country.
The Clintons will use this to get their plum jobs. Think Hillary is the best person to take Stevens’ seat on USSC? They’ve known this for quite a while.
100% true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
