Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Democrats Contemplate Abolishing 401(k) Tax Breaks
Workforce Management ^ | October 16, 2008 | Workforce staff

Posted on 10/24/2008 2:04:09 PM PDT by RetiredArmy

House Democrats Contemplate Abolishing 401(k) Tax Breaks

Powerful House Democrats are eyeing proposals to overhaul the nation’s $3 trillion 401(k) system, including the elimination of most of the $80 billion in annual tax breaks that 401(k) investors receive.

House Education and Labor Committee Chairman George Miller, D-California, and Rep. Jim McDermott, D-HAMAS (Washington), chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee’s Subcommittee on Income Security and Family Support, are looking at redirecting those tax breaks to a new system of guaranteed retirement accounts to which all workers would be obliged to contribute.

A plan by Teresa Ghilarducci, professor of economic-policy analysis at the New School for Social Research in New York, contains elements that are being considered. She testified last week before Miller’s Education and Labor Committee on her proposal.

At that hearing, the director of the Congressional Budget Office, Peter Orszag, testified that some $2 trillion in retirement savings has been lost over the past 15 months.

Under Ghilarducci’s plan, all workers would receive a $600 annual inflation-adjusted subsidy from the U.S. government but would be required to invest 5 percent of their pay into a guaranteed retirement account administered by the Social Security Administration. The money in turn would be invested in special government bonds that would pay 3 percent a year, adjusted for inflation.

The current system of providing tax breaks on 401(k) contributions and earnings would be eliminated.

I want to stop the federal subsidy of 401(k)s,” Ghilarducci said in an interview. “401(k)s can continue to exist, but they won’t have the benefit of the subsidy of the tax break.”

Under the current 401(k) system, investors are charged relatively high retail fees, Ghilarducci said.

“I want to spend our nation’s dollar for retirement security better. Everybody would now be covered” if the plan were adopted, Ghilarducci said.

She has been in contact with Miller and McDermott about her plan, and they are interested in pursuing it, she said.

“This [plan] certainly is intriguing,” said Mike DeCesare, press secretary for McDermott.

“That is part of the discussion,” he said.

While Miller stopped short of calling for Ghilarducci’s plan at the hearing last week, he was clearly against continuing tax breaks as they currently exist.

Savings rate

“The savings rate isn’t going up for the investment of $80 billion,” he said. “We have to start to think about ... whether or not we want to continue to invest that $80 billion for a policy that’s not generating what we now say it should.”

“From where I sit that’s just crazy,” said John Belluardo, president of Stewardship Financial Services Inc. in Tarrytown, New York. “A lot of people contribute to their 401(k)s because of the match of the employer,” he said. Belluardo’s firm does not manage assets directly.

Higher-income employers provide matching funds to employee plans so that they can qualify for tax benefits for their own defined-contribution plans, he said.

“If the tax deferral goes away, the employers have no reason to do the matches, which primarily help people in the lower income brackets,” Belluardo said.

“This is a battle between liberalism and conservatism,” said Christopher Van Slyke, a partner in the La Jolla, California, advisory firm Trovena, which manages $400 million. “People are afraid because their accounts are seeing some volatility, so Democrats will seize on the opportunity to attack a program where investors control their own destiny,” he said.

The Profit Sharing/401(k) Council of America in Chicago, which represents employers that sponsor defined-contribution plans, is “staunchly committed to keeping the employee benefit system in America voluntary,” said Ed Ferrigno, vice president in the Washington office.

“Some of the tenor [of the hearing last week] that the entire system should be based on the activities of the markets in the last 90 days is not the way to judge the system,” he said.

No legislative proposals have been introduced and Congress is out of session until next year.

However, most political observers believe that Democrats are poised to gain seats in both the House and the Senate, so comments made by the mostly Democratic members who attended the hearing could be a harbinger of things to come.

Advice at issue

In addition to tax breaks for 401(k)s, the issue of allowing investment advisors to provide advice for 401(k) plans was also addressed at the hearing. Rep. Robert Andrews, D-New Jersey, was critical of Department of Labor proposals made in August that would allow advisors to give individual advice if the advice was generated using a computer model.

Andrews characterized the proposals as “loopholes” and said that investment advice should not be given by advisors who have a direct interest in the sale of financial products.

The Pension Protection Act of 2006 contains provisions making it easier for investment advisors to give individualized counseling to 401(k) holders.

“In retrospect that doesn’t seem like such a good idea to me,” Andrews said. “This is an issue I think we have to revisit. I frankly think that the compromise we struck in 2006 is not terribly workable or wise,” he said.

On Thursday, October 9, the Department of Labor hastily scheduled a public hearing on the issue in Washington for Tuesday, October 21.

The agency does not frequently hold public hearings on its proposals.

Filed by Sara Hansard of Investment News, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 110th; 401k; cheatingdimocrats; ira; pelosi; retirement; rothira; taxes; taxincrease
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last
Rush talked about this today. They will do away with the 401k plan. Your money goes into social security, you die your family does not get it all back, only 50%, as the death tax cuts it by half, it is administered by the SS system, you get no tax benefit, THUS you go into a higher tax bracket EVEN THOUGH you put money into this account. So, the US GOVERNMENT basically owns your retirement account, you die, your family does not get it all back.
1 posted on 10/24/2008 2:04:10 PM PDT by RetiredArmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

SS = Slaves of the State


2 posted on 10/24/2008 2:06:43 PM PDT by Argus (Obama: All turban and no goats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

No we CAN’T PRIVATIZE A PORTION OF SOCIAL SECURITY TO SAVE IT BE WE SURE CAN RAID PRIVATIZED 401K’S TO SAVE SOCIAL SECURITY!!!
THIS JUST REINFORCES THE CASE FOR PRIVATIZATION!!


3 posted on 10/24/2008 2:08:00 PM PDT by CommieCutter ("Why DON'Y you just let PEOOPLEP make up their own MINES who listen?“ (-Candor7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

Scary


4 posted on 10/24/2008 2:08:26 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CommieCutter

BE = BUT


5 posted on 10/24/2008 2:08:41 PM PDT by CommieCutter ("Why DON'Y you just let PEOOPLEP make up their own MINES who listen?“ (-Candor7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

ANd so it begins.The pathway to Socialism.


6 posted on 10/24/2008 2:08:52 PM PDT by rodguy911 (HOME OF THE FREE BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE--GO SARAHCUDA !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

This alone will cause the Demos to lose Congress in 2010 if implemented. Are they really this stupid? (Rhetorical)


7 posted on 10/24/2008 2:09:19 PM PDT by Hazwaste (Feeling bitter and clingy since 1963.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

I posted this the other day. The democrats are looking for a down 3000.

They want to win at all costs. The reason why Wall Street is crashing and burning are political with the democrats creating a panic on Wall Street and worldwide.

This is socialism at it’s best.


8 posted on 10/24/2008 2:09:27 PM PDT by ncfool (Obama stands for The New United Socialist State or "TNUSSA")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy
Ghilarducci is a fiscal idiot. She's failed to account for the fact that 401(k) accounts are subsequently taxed at INCOME TAX rates and not at the far lower CAPITAL GAINS TAX rates.

Otherwise, this old broad is advocating something little different from "W"'s Social Security privatization deal with a hidden increase in Social Security taxes.

Folks will continue to direct their investment dollars to the stock market and will pay no taxes on their investments at all until they make "withdrawals", and then pay only at the capital gains rate.

See how easy it was for that woman to TRICK Democrats?

9 posted on 10/24/2008 2:09:48 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

This will be the end. Why bother working, when the Democrats are going to take all your money?


10 posted on 10/24/2008 2:10:00 PM PDT by realcleanguy ("I have not yet begun to fight")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

Assholes. Pardon my Norwegian.


11 posted on 10/24/2008 2:10:55 PM PDT by Egon (The difference between Theory and Practice: In Theory, there is no difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

I will opt for early withdraw if they pull this crap!


12 posted on 10/24/2008 2:11:11 PM PDT by CommieCutter ("Why DON'Y you just let PEOOPLEP make up their own MINES who listen?“ (-Candor7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy
I want to spend our nation’s dollar for retirement security better. Everybody would now be covered

Remember now, only racists would criticize this plan and call it socialist.

13 posted on 10/24/2008 2:12:29 PM PDT by JimSEA (just another liberal-bashing fearmonger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

I have been talking to everyone I can today about this. If the dem’s are allowed to get away with this and the RNC and Republicans don’t get in front of the microphones and spread this, it will be disasterous! Hacks me off!


14 posted on 10/24/2008 2:13:02 PM PDT by southernindymom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

Privatizing Social Security can’t be discussed, but this is okay?


15 posted on 10/24/2008 2:13:03 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy
I can't believe that they were so dumb as to suggest this before the election, unless they wanted to tank the market deliberately to harm McCain.
16 posted on 10/24/2008 2:13:34 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The fourth estate is the fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

Thanks very much for posting.

UNFRIKKENBELIEVABLE! Socialist security is the greatest fraud ever forced on “free people”. These SOCIALIST SCUMBAGS are finding new ways to plunder our time of life and the meager savings we have accumulated through our hard work.


17 posted on 10/24/2008 2:13:55 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

Un-F@#$%^G-Believeable!

The BASTARDS who managed to engineer the financial meltdown are now going to FORCE US to use their solution, and steal even MORE money from us...

Mark


18 posted on 10/24/2008 2:14:24 PM PDT by MarkL (Al Gore: The Greenhouse Gasbag! (heard on Bob Brinker's Money Talk))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

This is only a glimpse of what a rat Congress will do if The Zero wins. It will be challenged of course in the courts, where this theft will be found “Constitutional.”


19 posted on 10/24/2008 2:14:36 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Acorn & CRA - Reparations by other means.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy
As Hillary said months ago, It's for the greater good.
20 posted on 10/24/2008 2:15:46 PM PDT by Rapscallion (I want to hear the sound of tumbrels....and the thud of the guillotine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson