Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYT: U.S. May Take Ownership Stake in Banks
New York Times ^ | October 9, 2008 | By EDMUND L. ANDREWS and MARK LANDLER

Posted on 10/09/2008 4:25:01 AM PDT by RaceBannon

U.S. May Take Ownership Stake in Banks Treasury Dept. Would Hope to Spur Lending By EDMUND L. ANDREWS and MARK LANDLER Treasury officials say the just-passed $700 billion bailout bill gives them the authority to inject cash into banks that request it.

Q & A: The Fed’s Rate Cut Times Topics: Credit Crisis — The Essentials

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banking; communistmanifesto; decline; nytimes; socilism; takeover
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
U.S. May Take Ownership Stake in Banks Treasury Dept. Would Hope to Spur Lending By EDMUND L. ANDREWS and MARK LANDLER Treasury officials say the just-passed $700 billion bailout bill gives them the authority to inject cash into banks that request it.

Q & A: The Fed’s Rate Cut Times Topics: Credit Crisis — The Essentials

1 posted on 10/09/2008 4:25:01 AM PDT by RaceBannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon; stowaway; jjm2111; Mrs.LoneGOPinCT; underbyte; badbackman; Bigfitz; mcswan; ...

Socialism...it is here.


2 posted on 10/09/2008 4:25:51 AM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty; The Pendleton 8: We are not going down without a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

Any purchases of stock would most likely be of non-voting preferred stock, and not of voting common stock.


3 posted on 10/09/2008 4:26:07 AM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

Or, is this “Compassionate conservatism.”


4 posted on 10/09/2008 4:29:36 AM PDT by Boiling Pots (Wright, Ayers, Alinsky, ACORN and Odinga - Attack!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
Socialism...it is here

We're in it thick now. And it's already getting ugly. AIG getting thrashed for rewarding its top performing sales people. In Socialism, only the political class gets the perks. Who do these hard working salespeople think they are, to expect rewards for their own hard work and success? No, from now on the Party will decide who gets rewarded. It's a dark day for America.

5 posted on 10/09/2008 4:30:09 AM PDT by LikeLight (http://www.believersguidetolegalissues.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

It won’t help at all. If banks keep writing derivatives, there is no end in sight to the mess.


6 posted on 10/09/2008 4:30:53 AM PDT by finnsheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

the deeper the govt gets, the deeper the hole they dig

obviously the Paulson/Pelosi/Frank “bailout” plan is so deeply flawed that banks eschew using it

So their answer is to takeover the banks?

we are in deep deep doo-doo


7 posted on 10/09/2008 4:32:27 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnsheep

Derivatives? Please. It’s all about mortgages to low-income people.


8 posted on 10/09/2008 4:32:27 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Derivatives? Please. It’s all about mortgages to low-income people.

Sorry, but it's both.

9 posted on 10/09/2008 4:34:19 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

Im sure a significant portion of the nonperforming mortgages are to middle income folks who unwisely chose teaser ARMS and now cannot refinance and are getting no cooperation from the lenders


10 posted on 10/09/2008 4:34:25 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LikeLight

AIG turned out to have spent what,$4000 on each person?Hardly what I would call wasteful spending for rewarding sales people.


11 posted on 10/09/2008 4:35:48 AM PDT by quack ("Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy; silverleaf

I was being sarcastic.

If financial insitutions had not been allowed to run amok with derivatives and credit swaps, we wouldn’t be where we’re at today. Of course, suggesting such is heresy.


12 posted on 10/09/2008 4:36:49 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
Socialism...it is here.

Not if they are bankrupt, the US is a creditor.

13 posted on 10/09/2008 4:39:37 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

I have an idea. Lets have the SS monies purchase bargain banks. We can kill two birds with one stone. If it works we solve the funding SS problem. If it fails we get rid of SS.


14 posted on 10/09/2008 4:41:26 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnsheep
If banks keep writing derivatives, there is no end in sight to the mess.

Nonsense.

15 posted on 10/09/2008 4:42:31 AM PDT by tcostell (MOLON LABE - http://freenj.blogspot.com - RadioFree NJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
If financial insitutions had not been allowed to run amok with derivatives and credit swaps, we wouldn’t be where we’re at today.

If we were all still riding horses just think of all the car accidents that would have been avoided.

16 posted on 10/09/2008 4:43:50 AM PDT by tcostell (MOLON LABE - http://freenj.blogspot.com - RadioFree NJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: finnsheep

The root of the problem is the desire of the majority of the polity to live beyond its means. So the government runs deficits, and the consumer has debt. Then a so-called unexpected crisis occurs, the debts can’t be repaid, and our rulers and commentators scurry to restore a “confidence” that should never have existed.


17 posted on 10/09/2008 4:43:53 AM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
U.S. May Take Ownership Stake in Banks

Break it. Fix it. Retain the newly-acquired powers.

Nope, never seen that before! /s
18 posted on 10/09/2008 4:44:16 AM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
Report: U.S. Considering Taking Ownership Stake in Banks

cross-linking

19 posted on 10/09/2008 4:47:46 AM PDT by prairiebreeze ( Our troops DESERVE BETTER than Barack Hussein Obama!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
Never thought I'd say this, but I would rather see the Fed loan to the businesses who can't get credit, directly.

If the middlemen don't want to play any more, they can stay off the field.

20 posted on 10/09/2008 4:50:02 AM PDT by Notary Sojac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson