Skip to comments.
Esquire backs Obama in its first endorsement
The Boston Globe/The Associated Press ^
| October 8, 2008
Posted on 10/08/2008 4:40:56 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
WASHINGTONEsquire is backing Democrat Barack Obama for president -- its first endorsement in the magazine's 75-year history.
The Illinois senator is "the only possible choice to lead the country," editors wrote in the November issue, on newsstands Oct. 14. They also encouraged people to vote for Obama because the next president will influence the direction of the Supreme Court.
"The best argument for the election of Barack Obama as president of the United States is written quite clearly in the peaks and squiggles of John Paul Stevens' EKG," they wrote of the 88-year-old justice.
Republican presidential nominee John McCain has run a "cheap and dishonorable campaign," they said. And his running mate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin is "stunningly unqualified."
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; election; elections; homosexualagenda; mccain; obama; palin; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Wow! A left-wing, somewhat "metrosexual"(read homosexual) fashion mag is endorsing Senator Barack Hussein Obama? What next? Wet rain?
"Stunningly unqualified" is it? She has more executive experience than Senators Obama and Biden, COMBINED!! What does that make them? Neither one has ever run so much as a shoe store! LOL
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Yeah, but who did Ebony endorse?
2
posted on
10/08/2008 4:42:01 PM PDT
by
kempster
To: 2ndDivisionVet
A gay magazine that fronts as a men’s mag endorses the lefty radical Obama?
SHOCKED!
To: 2ndDivisionVet
great, these Publications with limited distribution strive to make life long enemies, good business move. My Lord the elites are terrified of her. Our Joan of Arc, please God.
4
posted on
10/08/2008 4:43:20 PM PDT
by
lmc12
To: 2ndDivisionVet
They also encouraged people to vote for Obama because the next president will influence the direction of the Supreme Court.
Allowing Born-Alive Babies To Die Is Not Part Of A Woman's Choice:
* When asked by Saddleback Church Pastor Rick Warren "When does a baby get human rights", Barack Obama said glibly that it was "above my pay grade". How can a man who wants to be President Of The United States say that questions about Human Rights are "above my pay grade"? Barack Obama, while Illinois State Senator actually voted several times to allow newborn infants, babies born alive who survived late-term abortions, to be neglected, denied medical care, starved and killed in hospitals as a form of "reproductive rights" and "women's choice".
Even dogs would have more rights than babies who survive abortion under laws supported by Obama. Barack Obama voted on record to say that those living breathing infants do not have human rights and yet he didn't even have the courage to answer that same question at a time when the people of the nation he wants to lead are all watching and listening. That's just shameful cowardice.
We Can't Protect Human Rights If We Can't Protect Human Life.
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: kempster
Don't worry. Ebony and Jet are published in my little city and those that work at the plant are worried about their jobs. Circulation is not too good.
7
posted on
10/08/2008 4:44:36 PM PDT
by
vetvetdoug
(Obama lied and my 401K died.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“Neither one has ever run so much as a shoe store!”
Obama was in charge of training voter fraud agents. Plus his own campaign. Only a racist could ignore Obama’s vast qualifications.
8
posted on
10/08/2008 4:45:22 PM PDT
by
Tublecane
To: 2ndDivisionVet
In a related story, the Iron Dog Snow Machine Racing Association is leaning towards that McCain-Palin endorsement.
9
posted on
10/08/2008 4:45:30 PM PDT
by
presidio9
(What's the difference between Global Universalists and National Exceptionalists? -The 2008 election.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
John McCain has run a "cheap and dishonorable campaign Words fail me. Stevens must be looking the wrong direction into a one way window.
10
posted on
10/08/2008 4:46:36 PM PDT
by
oyez
(Justa' another high minded lowlife.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Esquire wants more left-wing judges to re-write the constitution from the bench and guarantee all forms of abortion on demand. Nice.
I predict Esquire won’t be around too much longer. Circulation of these periodicals is declining rapidly.
To: Tublecane
They’re going to run a front page of Obama a la Clinton!
12
posted on
10/08/2008 4:46:39 PM PDT
by
greyfoxx39
(TWO THINGS TO DISLIKE ABOUT OBAMA........HIS FACE!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Go to your local book store, grab a handful of Esquire's and retire to the men's or women's room and drop them in to the toilet.
Then,......
13
posted on
10/08/2008 4:46:39 PM PDT
by
garyhope
(qu)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Actually, this unprecedented (and commercially counterproductive) move is in fact proof positive that the gays have taken over the magazine completely.
14
posted on
10/08/2008 4:49:07 PM PDT
by
sinanju
To: kempster
The Dems get a magazine but.....we got a quarterback! :’)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Esquire 700k, Field & Stream 1.4 mill. Come F&S endorse her!
16
posted on
10/08/2008 4:52:44 PM PDT
by
lmc12
To: garyhope
You know how Barnes & Noble, Books-A-Million, Borders, etc. always has the left-wing books on display prominently up front and hides anything conservative? When I'm there, I do the old switcharoo on them.
17
posted on
10/08/2008 4:52:57 PM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(Barack Obama: In Error and arrogant -- he's errogant!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Esquire gives Obama the “Joe Cabernet-Sauvignon” endorsement
18
posted on
10/08/2008 4:53:53 PM PDT
by
silverleaf
(Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
after midnight we can short.
19
posted on
10/08/2008 4:54:09 PM PDT
by
scooby321
(Cai)
To: Baynative
You got that right. Recently, they tried to get me to subscribe for $6 for a year. Cheap as that is I declined because they are so liberal. Good thing. It saves me the trouble of cancelling now.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson