How the left views the conservative voter:
Funny thing is that the last two photos are probably registered democrats...
Posted on 09/24/2008 1:00:46 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
Every two years, the Old Media engage in their now-familiar mating ritual with the liberal electorate. Acting on cue, reporters and columnists dust off their tired clichés and recycle their flawed arithmetic to show how this year women will – at long last – determine the outcome of the presidential election. Continues...
==================================================================
New Study shows Media full of it
Now that Obama is trailing in Ohio, Virginia, Florida, Missouri and stuck in a dead heat in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, with campaign staff rapidly evacuating from North Dakota -- time for the liberal media . . . oops, sorry, the totally 'impartial' and 'objective' media to reach for their standby excuse for why their loser is losing: Racism!
To prop up the fading celebrity, the media all summer had tried playing the class warfare card, urging voters to vote Obama because Obama owns only one mansion, whereas Cindy McCain has several homes. And that Obama owns just one car but John McCain has several, making Obama prepared to lead! Obama spent millions on attack ads accusing McCain of being rich and successful, and (shockingly!) McCain's poll numbers went up.
Sooooo, out comes this "study" purporting to show that the reason an empty-suit, tax-raising, rogue-state/terrorist-coddling, zero accomplishment, Jeremiah Wright disciple and effete Harvard elitist pal of Ayers, Rezko, Freddie and Fannie is doing so poorly in polls is because of his skin color. Over 96 percent of blacks support Obama, so the media conclude this has nothing to do with skin color. It's only non-blacks who are the 'racists'.
"Barack Obama's race could be the deciding factor if the presidential battle remains a dead heat on Election Day, according to an Associated Press poll released in conjunction with Stanford University," the WSJ reports. They polled 2,227 adults, asked them a series of stupid questions, and, on the basis that only 7 out of 10 Democrats say they support Obama, Standford University and the AP concluded that "many white Americans" are racists. Just 59% of Hillary Clinton's "primary voters say they will vote for Obama," so the remaining 41% are 'racists'. Seventeen percent say they're voting McCain -- making them Bull Conner-loving slavery revivalists.
Independent 'swing voters' are also guilty of 'racism', since a good chunk of them aren't supporting Obama, according to the 'study'.
The "study" also concluded that Republicans not backing Obama are 'racists', too, because they're not backing Obama. But the studiers note that GOP voters aren't the problem since studies show Republicans don't normally back Democrats anyway, which does wonders to the premise of this idiotic 'study'.
"Not all whites are prejudiced," the AP notes charitably, "indeed more whites say good things about blacks than say bad things, the poll shows." But! Since 40 percent of whites in the poll "used at least one negative adjective about blacks," clearly 40 percent of all white Americans want to revive slavery. The negative adjectives include "'lazy,' 'violent,' or responsible for their own troubles." The music industry and Hollywood constantly portray blacks as lazy, violent, or responsible for their own troubles, so it's a real mystery where these ideas come from.
But, not so fast! Another intensive study, just released, reaches the opposite conclusion. "White America's alleged deep-seated racism appeared not to be a problem for Gen. Colin Powell, who, unlike Obama, is actually black," said the study's author, "JohnHuang2", who conducted the study by entering key words and dates into Google. By Googling "NPR," "1995," and "Powell," according to this study, you get this: "A series of polls conducted over the past month show strong support for Colin Powell running as a Republican in a two-man race against President Clinton . . ." -- this was back in the fall of 1995, when Powell was thinking about running for president. The Washington Post reported at the time that "a late August poll for Newsweek magazine by Princeton Survey Research . . . shows that as the GOP nominee, Powell would defeat President Clinton by a decisive 51 percent to 41 percent. In the poll, no other Republican nominee, including Dole [who's white!], defeats the Democratic incumbent." JohnHuang2's landmark study also unearthed headlines like, "Colin Powell Puts Whites at Ease," from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, dated Sept. 15, 1995 -- when America was supposedly even more 'racist', since that was over 12 years before the coming of "The One We've Been Waiting For," B. Hussein, who injected race into the campaign in the first place.
A year ago, either you'd back Hillary or you're a grunting Neanderthal misogynist -- so are liberals knuckle-draggers now that they've opted for the all-male ticket while going bananas dumping on the gal governor, Sarah Palin? After playing the religion card, the bimbo card, the dominatrix card, the Gov. Pontius Pilate/madrightwingextremistwhofakedherpregnancy card and watching it all boomerang, the limping identity politics commissars limp into the Twilight Zone that Sarah's star will soon 'fade'. People will get tired of her authentic charm! According to the New York Times, her star has already 'faded'. In fact, at a rally Sunday, 60,000 rapturous Floridians came out to see this "fading" phenomenon. In sweltering weather. To see the next Vice President of the United States. Poor libbies.
Anyway, that's...
My Two Cents...
"JohnHuang2"
Ping...
Omigosh!
You’re firing on all cylinders!
I think this is possibly the best article you’ve ever written.
That is, until the next one...;o)
Actually, yhis is pretty amazing if it's valid.
How the left views the conservative voter:
Funny thing is that the last two photos are probably registered democrats...
More bull.
Excellent piece John.
Good one, John!
The lack of support for Obama amongst white democrats can probably be traced mostly to those pesky PUMA’s, who seem to not be falling in line as the DNC assumed they would.
Pity.
Oh thank God because I gotten so use to being out of power that I almost forgot how to oppress women and minorities, but the we had a refreshed at the “All White Males” meeting and went over the basics. We should be just fine.
Doctor Raoul on behalf of “The Man”,
Keeping You Down Since 1776
Peace Out.
Some won't vote for Obama because of his skin color but the majority won't be voting for him because of his EXTREME LEFTIST policies. They've had a chance to get to KNOW him beyond the color of his skin. They find Obama unacceptable. Obama would not have gotten to be the Demoncrat candidate if it was ONLY about SKIN COLOR. There are not enough BLACKS to catapult him into that position.
......There are not enough BLACKS to catapult him into that position.....
Then there is the question of how many blacks actually vote? A large portion of the general population doesn’t vote. One wonders if the same or smaller % of the black segment actually vote. The Acorn efforts are all about getting them to actually vote.
Blacks will be out this yesr because of Obama’s SKIN COLOR. Even the dumbest one, KNOWS about Obama. Organizations like ACORN will have an easier job. They won’t have to bribe them with drugs or alcohol.
......Blacks will be out this yesr because of Obama’s SKIN COLOR......
To actually go vote requires planning and effort.
The easy course is to merely say “I voted for Obama”
that is what will happen.
I think you’re right....but vote fraud may end up playing a bigger factor than we anticipate.
Fraud you can believe in. Get the duck tape ready for your head. All stops will be pulled out! The process has been in place and is already taking hold.
Thank you so much for this excellent essay!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.