Posted on 09/17/2008 11:15:26 AM PDT by Domandred
Mod note: Do no post any screenshots of Governor Palin's Yahoo account on Free Republic.
Thank you.
On the heels of media reports that Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin was using a private Yahoo e-mail account (gov.palin@yahoo.com) to conduct Alaska state business, hackers have broken into the account and posted evidence of the hijack on Wikileaks.
An activist group calling itself anonymous claimed responsibility for the compromise and released screenshots, photographs and the e-mail addresses of several people close to Palin, including her husband Todd and assistant Ivy Frye.
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.zdnet.com ...
Ha! Yahoogate! Love it!!!
You know why, October surprise.
The lion's share of the blame should always go to the person that performed the illegal act.
That said, if the victim doesn't perform due diligence then they deserve some blame too. There's nothing unusual in "blaming the victim" of a car theft if the victim left the keys in the ignition. That doesn't take anything away from the blame assigned to the car thief, but the car owner still should be chastised for leaving the keys where they provide easy access to a thief.
And, as usual, it all comes down to Layer 1. In computer networking Layer 1 is the physical layer, the wire. It's also a euphemism for the physical part of any network infrastructure from the room that it's in, to the cabinet the server sits in to the server case itself.
If you don't have physical control of the hardware, you don't really have control at all. Using a third party to manage your email means that a third party has access to your email. There's just no way around that.
My email server is at my house. A person wanting physical access to it is going to have to deal with locks, dogs, guns and alarms.
If your email is at Yahoo! or Google then the people that run the network there have access to it. If you're using your email account to receive email from eBay when you win something then it doesn't much matter.
If you're doing official government business then it does. If you are exchanging messages with someone and you'd rather not find them on the front page of the New York Times, then it does.
No one is saying that it's all the Governor's fault. But she did something dumb and someone else took advantage of that.
Though not, apparently, beyond the reach of a l33t hacqer d00d.
Yup.
her use of the Yahoo accounts was public for some time. I’m surprised she didn’t zap the accounts earlier.
I’m wagering nobody cares how much “business” she might have discussed on her PRIVATE email account that was HACKED by some LOWLIFE. She will get so much love from this that the October Surprise, whatever it is, will be the October Yawn. Irrelevant! LOL
That is better than nothing, but doesn't mean that the system admin of the email server can't see your email.
It's trivial to make a copy of any mail that hits the server and store it elsewhere.
At the bottom of the home page at yahoo.com is a contact us link. Every single day I send them emails pointing out the bias of the “headlines” - all democrat hugs and kisses and all republican hatred.
At the bottom of the home page at yahoo.com is a contact us link. Every single day I send them emails pointing out the bias of the “headlines” - all democrat hugs and kisses and all republican hatred.
Yes. If I wouldn't put a message on a post card, I don't put it in email of any kind.
You'd think that by now people would have learned that anything sensitive needs to be encrypted (on your system before it's uploaded).
Also, why would she use such an obvious login name?
The Demwits are re-defining stupidity here. Can they say, "BACKFIRE"?
Doesn’t look legit at all to me. Even going through the wikileaks files didn’t make it any more convincing. Somebody has two photos and some screenshots?
I could easily go to yahoo and set up an email box called gov.soandso@yahoo.com. I can easily fill it full of some fake emails and capture a screen shot.
gov.palin@yahoo.com looks too obvious to me. If it were her personal email box, I’d think it would be unrelated to the “gov” title.
There is an email in there that says “Look at Trig” which implies to me that there is a picture of Trig attached...yet there is not attachment to the email. This just doesn’t smell right.
I’d make sure those that would criticize her for having a yahoo box would wait for further confirmation.
I should add that the “destroying evidence” gambit that some will be trying to play up is a hoot, too. Evidence of what and who cares anyway??
This probably had something to do with the fact that my dad shot a burglar and it made the news . . . .
Word gets around.
It appears she has/had several “Official” contacts in her account.
It would seem to me, if they had anything more destructive, they’d have released it, or does Wikileaks only have the few screenshots that were sent to them...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.