Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Roger Ebert weighs in: The American Idol candidate
Sun-Times ^ | 9/10/08 | Roger Ebert

Posted on 09/10/2008 8:55:55 PM PDT by xDGx

The American Idol candidate

September 10, 2008

By Roger Ebert

I think I might be able to explain some of Sara Palin's appeal. She's the "American Idol" candidate. Consider. What defines an "American Idol" finalist? They're good-looking, work well on television, have a sunny personality, are fierce competitors, and so talented, why, they're darned near the real thing. There's a reason "American Idol" gets such high ratings. People identify with the contestants. They think, Hey, that could almost be me up there on that show!

My feeling is, I don't want to be up there. I want a vice president who is better than me, wiser, well-traveled, has met world leaders, who three months ago had an opinion on Iraq. Someone who doesn't repeat bald-faced lies about earmarks and the Bridge to Nowhere. Someone who doesn't appoint Alaskan politicians to "study" global warming, because, hello! It has been studied. The returns are convincing enough that John McCain and Barack Obama are darned near in agreement.

I would also want someone who didn't make a teeny little sneer when referring to "people who go to the Ivy League." When I was a teen I dreamed of going to Harvard, but my dad, an electrician, told me, "Boy, we don't have the money. Thank your lucky stars you were born in Urbana and can go to the University of Illinois right here in town." So I did, very happily. Although Palin gets laughs when she mentions the "elite" Ivy League, she sure did attend the heck out of college. Five schools in six years. What was that about?

And how can you be her age and never have gone to Europe? My dad had died, my mom was working as a book-keeper and I had a job at the local newspaper when, at 19, I scraped together $240 for a charter flight to Europe. I had Arthur Frommer's $5 a Day under my arm, started in London, even rented a Vespa and drove in the traffic of Rome. A few years later, I was able to send my mom, along with the $15 a Day book.

You don't need to be a pointy-headed elitist to travel abroad. You need curiosity and a hunger to see the world. What kind of a person (who has the money) arrives at the age of 44 and has only been out of the country once, on an official tour to Iraq? Sarah Palin's travel record is that of a hopeless provincial.

But some people like that. She's never traveled to Europe, Asia, Africa, South America or Down Under? That makes her like them. She didn't go to Harvard? Good for her! There a lot of hockey moms who haven't seen London, but most of them would probably love to, if they had the dough. And they'd be proud if their kids won a scholarship to Harvard.

Palin is a shallow, chirpy person with those vaguely alarming eyeglasses. Now her fans all want a pair. Remember back when women wore glasses that departed their ears in plastic swoops and swirls? My theory is, anyone who wears glasses that look weird is telling me something I don't want to know.

I trust the American people will see through Palin's facade, and save the Republic in November. The most damning indictment against her is that she considered herself a good choice to be a heartbeat away. That shows bad judgment.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: critics; ebert; enormous; irrelevance; mccainpalin; movie; rogerebert
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: xDGx

Palin is a shallow, chirpy person with those vaguely alarming eyeglasses.


This kills me. He’s attack Palin for being shallow, yet feels compelled to comment about....her eyeglasses? Kinda llke the pot calling the kettle black, eh Roger?


21 posted on 09/10/2008 9:14:53 PM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xDGx

...You don’t need to be a pointy-headed elitist to travel abroad...

but spouting such stupid stuff is evidence that Roger is a “pointy-headed elitist”.

All these creepy liberals that feel the need to jump on the Palin bashing wagon are doing more damage to Obambi with every passing day. Keep it up guys...Sweet meltdown....


22 posted on 09/10/2008 9:14:59 PM PDT by UltraKonservativen (( YOU CAN'T FIX STUPID!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xDGx

I’ve been to europe and asia dozens of times. I’ve had offices in both the US and europe and lived part of the year in europe for many years. Believe me, it is nothing to write home about. I did learn from the experience that most people outside of the US are sheep without much of an education.

The US is by no means perfect, but a far, far better place to live than anywhere that I’ve visited. The opportunities in the US are fantastic. Even a young girl from Alaska with no political connections and no fortune can grow up to be the governor of the largest state of the most powerful country in the world and even become a VP candidate of that country. Try doing that in europe where you are forever a nobody unless you were born into the right family or have friends in high places.


23 posted on 09/10/2008 9:16:18 PM PDT by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xDGx

Like Obama is the REAL thing? I say GET REAL. He is a jive talker, a con artist, a pimp. He wants to put everyone in America on welfare.


24 posted on 09/10/2008 9:16:29 PM PDT by boroman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

“Kinda llke the pot calling the kettle black, eh Roger?”

More like the vat calling the kettle black...

“Waitress? Bring me another pitcher of sausage gravy!”


25 posted on 09/10/2008 9:17:36 PM PDT by xDGx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: xDGx

Roger is right. Gov Palin never saw the world nor went to an ivy league college. I must point out to him that the moral hazard schemes, savings and loans scandal, Enron, Worldcom, etc, and the high price of oil caused by speculating activity are schemes hatched, managed and created by ivy league, globe trotting elites. Roger thinks education is the one of the indicators of a person character, but I will argue that morality trumps them all. Teddy Roosevelt once said morality is a valuable component in formal education. Exclude it, and you will end up with an educated menace. America is threatened by educated menaces, just look at all those high cost scandals that keep slamming the US every five years. The Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac debacle is another brick tied around the taxpayers neck along with the cost of entitlements and global military crusades. Luckily the US still has a 14 trillion GDP to fall back on but keep this up and we will end up as a second rate power not because of Russia or China, but globe trotting traitors educated by ivy league schools crippling our nation from within.


26 posted on 09/10/2008 9:18:12 PM PDT by Fee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xDGx

I am so far past humoring Roger Ebert that it isn’t funny.
Get a real job you effing wanker.


27 posted on 09/10/2008 9:24:37 PM PDT by ClaudiusI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xDGx

Roger Ebert wasn’t nearly so obnoxious when Gene Siskel was still alive. I used to watch “At the Movies” faithfully, and I liked both Siskel and Ebert and enjoyed their movie reviews. After Gene died, both Roger and the show really went downhill.


28 posted on 09/10/2008 9:29:31 PM PDT by Huntress (If you have a chip on your shoulder, you think everybody's trying to knock it off.-AnAmericanMother)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Obama is well traveled........of course, we paid for it:

“Obama most costly freshman world traveler
First term senator’s charges nearly 45% higher than his classmates”

“WASHINGTON - Barack Obama’s two years in the Senate have taken him around the world, from Russia to Iraq to Kenya - an itinerary more costly to taxpayers than any other senator who took office with him.

The Illinois Democrat’s travels in 2005 and 2006 cost taxpayers nearly $28,000 as he studied nuclear proliferation, AIDS, Middle Eastern violence and more.”

“Obama’s journeys are unusual for such a junior senator, but not for someone thinking of a presidential run someday.”

“The official travel spending figures reported to the government don’t include the cost of flights on military aircraft, which are often used on overseas trips by a congressional delegation. They also omit the staff time and security costs incurred by the U.S. embassies in the countries lawmakers visit.”

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17165679/


29 posted on 09/10/2008 9:29:45 PM PDT by JoeDetweiler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xDGx
More like the vat calling the kettle black...

Thanks a lot. Now my monitor's got Dr Pepper all over it.

30 posted on 09/10/2008 9:31:43 PM PDT by Huntress (If you have a chip on your shoulder, you think everybody's trying to knock it off.-AnAmericanMother)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: xDGx
The remarks above show the genius of the Gov. Palin pick. At every use of the word "Palin" you can substitute "Obama". Now tell me why it is OKay for the rats to nominate Obama, but we can't have Gov. Palin on our ticket? Seems to me that being a governor is more significant than being a senator or a community organizer. Gosh, Jessie Jackson and the ever-funny Al Sharpton are community organizers, but not even the rats could come close to nominating either one.

Note that Obama won his US Senate seat as a result of the failure of the Ryan campaign in 2004. Jack Ryan won the crowded Republican primary with a plurality of votes by a margin of 12% over his closest Republican rival, but three months later, on June 25, 2004 announced his withdrawal from the race — four days after the Chicago Tribune succeeded in persuading a California court to release previously-sealed child custody records containing embarrassing allegations by Ryan's ex-wife.

Six weeks later, on August 4, 2004, the Illinois Republican State Central Committee asked Alan Keyes of Maryland to replace Ryan as the Republican candidate. Keyes accepted four days later and moved into an apartment in Illinois four days after that, less than 3 months before the general election. Obama did not even deign to have a debate with Keyes. Obama won with a 43% margin.

Everything about Obama is just so thin and unsubstantial it is astonishing that he would have the audacity to run for POTUS, but to his credit he convinced the rats to give him the nomination. Fortunately for America, the activist rats are a small fraction of the voting electorate.
31 posted on 09/10/2008 9:34:23 PM PDT by sefarkas (Why vote Democrat Lite?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xDGx
Roger Ebert is a national treasure, and I wish you pinheads would leave him alone. He is THE ONLY critic in the world I have found to be 100%. If he likes a movie, it's crap. You don't get more reliable than that, and that's what criticism is all about: do I trust this man's judgment enough to absolutely guarantee my movie choice? Indeed I do. There are no false positives with Roger: everything he likes is garbage. There are no false negatives with Roger: everything he hates is good.
32 posted on 09/10/2008 9:34:48 PM PDT by FredZarguna (Don't Tase me, Pa!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

I haven’t watched Ebert since Siskel died, but I remember that Siskel was usually right, and Ebert was always wrong. Siskel once told Ebert, “You say you like every movie because you just like to see your name on the posters.”


33 posted on 09/10/2008 9:40:48 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: xDGx

I thought for sure he was talking about Ho-bama...what an idiot.


34 posted on 09/10/2008 9:49:17 PM PDT by Keith (McCain-Palin Get off your duff and work to get them elected!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus

I thought Ebert was dead.


35 posted on 09/10/2008 9:49:54 PM PDT by 6SJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus
I liked Siskel, and when they referred to the Fat Guy and the Gay Guy, I was confused, because I thought Ebert was both. Two thumbs up or two thumbs down was always OK, because Siskel was occasionally wrong, and Ebert always was. The one thumb up was the problem because it meant either a really good, or really hideous film, and you didn't know until you found out which thumb was Ebert's.

Number of years ago, R. Emmett Tyrell slammed Ebert for some asinine comment in the "Current Wisdom" section of the American Spectator. I was astonished to see a letter from Ebert a few months later whining because (he claimed) he always had enjoyed the Spectator. Of course it was crap. Ebert just didn't want to lose audience share.

36 posted on 09/10/2008 9:51:09 PM PDT by FredZarguna (Senator Obama, I knew the Higgs. The Higgs was a friend of mine.. and Senator... you're no Higgs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus

lol!

Seriously, there does seem to be an inferiority complex with some people from Chicago, who trip over themselves trying to prove they are as cosmopolitan as folks from New York or LA. The thing is, I never run into people from London or New York or Stockholm who are as obsessed about pointing out where they have traveled. It’s odd that a woman from Alaska should elicit an almost catty response from a supposedly urbane Chicagoite. Jealousy comes in all shapes, sizes and genders apparently.


37 posted on 09/10/2008 9:52:09 PM PDT by xDGx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: xDGx
I think I might be able to explain some of Sara Palin's appeal. She's the "American Idol"

Good! We're sure to get the American Idol vote now!

38 posted on 09/10/2008 10:03:42 PM PDT by Nonperson (One could say Mohammed was a community organizer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

39 posted on 09/10/2008 10:04:25 PM PDT by FredZarguna (Senator Obama, I knew the Higgs. The Higgs was a friend of mine.. and Senator... you're no Higgs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: xDGx

It should be noted that Roger Ebert has recently gone through a lot of surgery for a Cancerous Thyroid gland, had a part of his jaw removed and is now unable to talk.

I met him at at an event shortly before all of this occurred. He was a nice guy and a lot of fun to talk to.

We didn’t talk politics as I was sure it would cause disagreements (me being conservative and all).

In any case, while we can take to task what the guy has wrote (believe me I heartily disagree with it, and I, myself, have thought of Barack Obama as the American Idol candidate and think it is funny for him to call Palin that, oblivious to the better association with Obama)let’s be easy on the guy himself.

I like him, he’s just a product of the Hollywood mindset.


40 posted on 09/10/2008 10:15:09 PM PDT by mego73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson