Nice going, docs.
1 posted on
09/10/2008 12:54:39 PM PDT by
pissant
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: pissant
To: pissant
3 posted on
09/10/2008 12:57:25 PM PDT by
LukeL
(Yasser Arafat: "I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize")
To: pissant
These people would have fit right in with Hitler’s lot.
To: pissant
All the more reason to keep their legs together then, I guess!
5 posted on
09/10/2008 12:57:38 PM PDT by
midnightson
(Mama-the ultimate prognosticator- said there'd be days like this.)
To: pissant
To hell with the Hippocratic oath!
6 posted on
09/10/2008 12:58:31 PM PDT by
twhitak
To: pissant
Euthanasia. Appeasement. Abortion. Communism. Anarchy. Homosexuality.
Liberals love Life, don’t they?
7 posted on
09/10/2008 12:58:34 PM PDT by
JoJo Gunn
To: pissant
Why is it a “moral decision”, doc?
If it’s not a human, then there’s no moral dilema.
If it is a human, then there’s also no moral dilema, it’s WRONG to kill it.
If you don’t know, it’s STILL wrong to kill it.
8 posted on
09/10/2008 12:59:05 PM PDT by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: pissant
"The worry is that this will have an implication for abortion issues in Canada," he said. The worry? Words fail me.
9 posted on
09/10/2008 12:59:23 PM PDT by
Shelayne
(McCain/Palin 08)
To: pissant
These people are frickin fascists !
To: pissant
This is from The Onion, right?
Please ays it is.
11 posted on
09/10/2008 12:59:53 PM PDT by
Skooz
(Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
To: pissant
Sarah sure has a knack for drawing the ugliest beasts out from under their rocks.
12 posted on
09/10/2008 12:59:54 PM PDT by
LikeLight
(http://www.believersguidetolegalissues.com)
To: pissant; wagglebee; GMMAC; Clive; exg; kanawa; backhoe; -YYZ-; Former Proud Canadian; ...
OFGS!!!
Are these people even human?
17 posted on
09/10/2008 1:02:14 PM PDT by
fanfan
(SCC:Canadians have constitutional protection to all opinions, as long as they are based on the facts)
To: pissant
Why would doctors be worried about this? It seems to me that this is a choice each family facing such a situation would make privately after having received input from various sources and after having done their own research.
18 posted on
09/10/2008 1:02:50 PM PDT by
AlaskaErik
(I served and protected my country for 31 years. Democrats spent that time trying to destroy it.)
To: pissant
19 posted on
09/10/2008 1:04:23 PM PDT by
B-Chan
(Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
To: pissant
This is what you get with Nationalized Medicine. Everything is viewed as a Cost-Benefit analysis, and a doctor’s ethics don’t really count for much.
21 posted on
09/10/2008 1:04:37 PM PDT by
Tallguy
("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
To: pissant
"Palin's decision to keep her baby, knowing he would be born with the condition, may inadvertently influence other women who may lack the necessary emotional and financial support to do the same." ie - The government should decide if non perfect human embryos are viable.
22 posted on
09/10/2008 1:04:51 PM PDT by
NoLibZone
(All Democrats must be rationed fuel to reduce their hypocrisy about global warming.)
To: pissant
To: pissant
It took a Canadian to finally say it. We all know the real reason the left hates Palin is that she actually exercised her right to choose to have the child.
The real, albeit unspoken, position of the left is that in cases like this there should be no "right to choose." The believe the child must be aborted for the good of society.
Palin, brings out the dark and sick underbelly of the Left.
To: pissant
Like a previous poster, I had to wonder if this was satire.
Sarah Palin, if nothing else has exposed the pro-choice movement to millions of Americans who may not have paid attention in the past. They are not pro-choice, as we have known for years. They are pro-death.
Couple this with Fowler’s statement from earlier, and you have an accurate picture of the pro-choice movement.
25 posted on
09/10/2008 1:11:01 PM PDT by
rom
(Cold on McCain '08. Enthusiastic about McCain-Palin '08!)
To: pissant
Dr. Mengele lives.
Obviously, “choice” is NOT intended to mean freedom to choose life for the baby. Probably they worry about health care money being used for these worthless human beings.
26 posted on
09/10/2008 1:12:28 PM PDT by
chesley
(I'm still alive, still employed, & still married. Life is GOOD)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson