Excellent point!!
What is the sound of one million liberals crying?..............
As for the observation factor and the Dems, the chances that they will understand the connection between their behaviour and Obama's leadership qualities is fairly remote.
Good observations.
Also, I make it a point to read any thread with “Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle” in the title. :)
If you make a bad assumption then the results of your experiment are unlikely to support your theory. In this case it is surely true that Obama and the Democrats are orchestrating the attack while publicly attempting to stand on the higher ground. So your basic assumption is wrong.
So the real experiment is: given Obama's marching orders to destroy this woman, how will the media soldiers react. I think we have seen the proof of that experiment. The soldiers have reacted as would be expected so it is a reasonable theory that Obama did indeed hand out the orders. Unfortunately for Obmaa, his soldiers, like Napoleon's, have met a superior force and are doomed to fail.
That's why at Free Republic we use the Heisenberg Compensator. The FR Heisenberg Compensator is used on media news polls to remove the affected changes in data that would have otherwise resulted in BS data.
;-)
From what I can see, the Democrat TV talking heads have turned on a dime, along with their journalist friends. They got the message to knock it off with the 17-year-old, and have gone on to snarky comments about whether McCain was “impulsive” and if Palin had been “vetted” enough.
Of course, the insinuation is that Palin had not informed the McCain camp of the pregnancy and the DUI. That is the subtext of the questioning; that McCain was tricked, and that he would not have otherwise selected her.
I would love to hear McCain say something like “I have been fully aware of all facts surrounding Ms. Palin from the beginning, and unlike you in the MSM and the Democrat Party, I did not consider any of these facts disqualifying to her candidacy”
Sarah Palin = Shroedinger’s Pit Bull
Obama’s supporters are well aware that his plea to them to knock it off is an empty request designed to give him plausibility deniability = Occam’s Razor
Working in an electronics lab we always have to be cognizant of our electronic probes and how much their internal impedance affects the accuracy of the measurement.
The problem is that "stop" means "go" and his people know it.
I don’t completely disagree, but the particles governed
by the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle follow a set of
physical laws that are not alterable.
The pithless honking black-holes that are the Obama
sycophant drones follow no such directing influences.
They are uncontrollable globs of randomly energized
protoplasm. They gladly gargle the bitter-sweet urine of
their leftist leaders and spit it on each other in their pious
pronoiac frenzy.
Very good and something that should be brought up until the MSM can’t ignore it.
One can NOT judge Obama’a leadership effectiveness by observing whether the attacks on Palin cease.
Obama’s call for cessation of the attacks is motivated by one of the folowing conditions:
A. He is offended by the attacks and genuinely sees them as low class politics unworthy of his noble crusade for the presidency. In this case, his opposition to the attacks is sincere.
B. Obama sees the attacks as transparent, weak and futile. He is fearful the attacks will actually strengthen Palin and blow back negatively against his own campaign. In this case, his opposition to the attacks is sincere.
C. Obama wants the attacks to continue and wants Palin to be destroyed by these attacks. His call for the attacks to cease is nothing but a cynical ploy to deflect criticism against himself.
Since C is obviously the correct answer, then Obama’s effectiveness can best be measured by how the imact of the attacks plays out. Can Obama drive up Palin’s negatives without being perceived as the bad guy? With his cronies in the press running interference for him, it’s a possibility.
” If Obama is the leader he claims to be the attacks against Palin’s family will cease immediately.”
Well, done!
This is a turning point in history. I wonder how many people will recognize that.
That assumes they know you're measuring them.
http://www.esa.int/esapub/br/br176/br176.pdf