Posted on 09/02/2008 11:16:16 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd
McCain: Palin "Vetting Process Was Thorough" CBS News
Palin disclosures raises questions about McCain's vetting process Dallas Morning News
Report: McCain still vetting Palin UPI
How thoroughly was Sarah Palin vetted? Apparently NOT Kansas City Star
Questions surround Palin's background check Anchorage Daily News
I hear Fox has breaking news that she doesnt recycle lol
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/30/AR2008083002377_pf.html
When the MSM raises such a question “on behalf of Republicans”, then I know we’ve done a good thing.
Yes.
why don’t read this
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/sep/01/mccain-camps-detailed-review-of-palin-1/
McCain’s campaign has dispatched a team of a dozen communications operatives and lawyers to Alaska.
Steve Schmidt, a senior adviser, said the campaign always planned to send a “jump team” to the eventual running mate’s home state to work with the nominee’s staff, help with information requests from local and national reporters, and answer questions about documents that were part of the review.
Frank Marshall Davis, Khalid al Mansour, Saul Alinsky, Jeremiah Wright, Tony Rezko, David Axelrod, Mazen Asbahi....
Oh, that’s the radical machine-messiah on the other side. My bad.
Only the McCain camp can answer that. Given what all is at stake I would assume it was thorough. I would hope that none of this is a surprise to them.
The Romneyites are still upset that McCain didn’t pick Romney.
Who gives a crap about “the vetting process”?
Its too damn late!.
Roll with what you got, its far superior to the racist obama and idiot biden duo.
And did I mention he's pro-infanticide?
What a nothing story.
The true story is that so-called political “journalists” didn’t do their jobs and report on a young, extremely popular female Governor of Alaska before she was John McCain’s VP selection.
There’s nothing brought up that brings into question the vetting process. This is another example of reporters trying to create news when there is none.
They’re desperate. Now they’re no longer talking about her, they’re talking about a process that took place over the last year.
Check out the latest from pissant!and the DU. Now this from you. Are you two guys posting from your moms basement? We've been over this already, no?
By the way, who vetted Indonesia Jones?
You know I think if McCain put up Christ himself, there would be some on FR whose first response would be “You mean that funny looking hippie that hangs out with whores and deadbeats!?!”
************************************
Although I do think the impact of her 1993 guilty plea to using a drift gillnet to harvest salmon is being underestimated.
**********************************
McCain camp's detailed review of Palin ^
09/01/2008 6:21:15 PM PDT · by bahblahbah · 44 replies · 1,756+ views Washington Times ^ | September 1, 2008 | LIZ SIDOTI |
||
|
||
After Disclosures, McCain Vetter Defends Review of Palin ^ |
||
09/02/2008 4:49:18 AM PDT · by mmanager · 132 replies · 1,866+ views A/P via Fox ^ | September, 2, 2008 | Fox News |
||
|
||
John McCain's vetter defends Sarah Palin review ^ |
||
09/02/2008 4:11:48 AM PDT · by Artemis Webb · 8 replies · 605+ views AP ^ | 09/02/08 | LIZ SIDOTI |
I think that got a good answer on a thread ...not sure I can find it....it was more of a paper work over sight.....issue.
************************EXCERPT INTRO***********************
Palin explained the fishing violation by saying that she had been a crew member but took over the permit for that season from her sister-in-law. Palin then forgot to switch her registration from that of a crew member to a permit holder, she said.
Palin called the court in Dillingham and straightened out the mistaken felony designation. The court clerk described it as a data input error and faxed Palin a letter of apology, saying the error has been corrected.
But in recent days reporters have anonymously received copies of the court record calling it a felony. I think its pretty cowardly, Palin said. Somebody is peddling this five days before the election, obviously to smear my reputation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.