Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Code Words
Townhall.com ^ | August 21, 2008 | Marvin Olasky

Posted on 08/21/2008 5:40:06 AM PDT by Kaslin

Journalists used to complain that George W. Bush's speechwriters slipped into his oratory phrases like America's "wonder-working power" that meant one thing to general audiences and another to evangelical supporters aware of the "wonder-working power in the blood of the Lamb." Far-fetched? Maybe, but this year Barack Obama is proving to be a master of that art.

"Economic justice" and "restoring fairness to the economy" are two of Obama's favorites. Who can oppose justice and fairness? To many Obama disciples, though, those words mandate not just equality of opportunity but a socialistic equality of result. Some in the general public would be less rhetorically transfixed if they understood the code.

Here's a more subtle example: Obama's call for nondiscrimination in religious hiring. Obama received a great press last month when he said he wanted to maintain and expand the White House faith-based initiative—except that any program receiving any federal funds could not discriminate in hiring. That sounded good to many: Who can support discrimination? To his disciples, though, the message was clear: Church-related programs will have to hire gays.

Obama acknowledged only that the requirement he proposed would be "sensitive . . . in very narrow circumstances." Narrow? A little bit of history helps here. On July 17, 2001, the House of Representatives was moving toward passage of a bill supporting the Bush faith-based initiative, but Rep. Mark Foley (who later left office after sending suggestive messages to congressional pages) proposed an amendment designed to end freedom of staffing for poverty-fighting religious groups receiving federal dollars. They would have had to hire gays, heterosexual adulterers, or others who practice what the Bible opposes.

Christian groups responded rapidly. The Family Research Council, for example, stated that "religious groups which hold certain moral beliefs—including that homosexuality is wrong—should not be forced to hire employees that don't believe that." Email alerts screamed, "CALL CONGRESS NOW." The House bill passed only after Speaker Denny Hastert said he would try later to work out a compromise. (See WORLD cover story, Aug. 7, 2001). "Later" never came, because the question of gay hiring killed the Senate bill.

Publications that are puffing Obama did not report that background. They left the impression that Obama supported a broad-based initiative. The Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations asked Obama to reconsider, and the American Jewish Congress warned that his proposal put Jewish organizations at risk, but their pleas received little publicity.

A new group, the Coalition to Preserve Religious Freedom (a multi-faith alliance growing out of the Center for Public Justice), did the best job of explaining that "Obama would create an unprecedented new restriction: every faith-based organization that accepts federal funds would be stripped of its religious staffing freedom when it comes to hiring people to run the federally funded program. There has never been such a sweeping restriction in the past."

The Coalition said it was not "dragging sectarian or political considerations into a discussion that should be about human services and better addressing social needs. Senator Obama rightly calls for an 'all hands on deck' attack on poverty and social problems. For that to occur, the rules have to respect all those 'hands'—treat all those organizations with respect."

The logic is clear: Just as environmental groups do not ignore the environmental views of prospective employees, so "faith-based organizations need the same freedom to take account of convictions and mission when building their staff." But the gay lobby pumps iron, particularly in the Democratic Party.

Journalists should push Obama to drop the code and be forthright about his views concerning not only faith-based initiative groups but any organizations that receive federal benefits in any way. Should Christian colleges whose students make use of government loans be required to hire gay professors and presidents? Will churches lose their tax-exempt status if they do not submit?


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; barackobama; economicjustice; elections; language; nobama08; obama; olasky

1 posted on 08/21/2008 5:40:08 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Capitalism is the fairest and most ‘economically equitable’ of any system ever developed in history. It rewards those who work and ignores those who do not..............


2 posted on 08/21/2008 5:52:27 AM PDT by Red Badger (All that carbon in all that oil and coal was once in the atmosphere. We're just putting it back.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Dr. Walter Williams once did a column on the importance and good of discrimination. For instance, it's discrimination that Megyn Kelly won't marry me. She's discriminating against me! Never mind that she doesn't know me, and I'm assuming that she loves someone else. It's still discrimination. And as we all know, all discrimination is bad! Right?

The problem is that far too many people don't really understand the meaning of the words they use. My guess is that the best modern example of that is "racism/racist."

Mark

3 posted on 08/21/2008 5:52:49 AM PDT by MarkL (Al Gore: The Greenhouse Gasbag! (heard on Bob Brinker's Money Talk))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

“...For instance, it’s discrimination that Megyn Kelly won’t marry me...”

Me too. We may have a class action suit, my FRiend!


4 posted on 08/21/2008 5:56:27 AM PDT by Islander7 ("Common sense and common decency are uncommon virtues among leftist.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Islander7
We may have a class action suit, my FRiend!

As crazy as I am about her, I don't know that I'd EVER want to face that beautiful lady in court. I have no doubt that we'd have a fully accurate demonstration of "evisceration" of my by a lawyer. Wow, is she smart, and can she be sharp!

Mark

5 posted on 08/21/2008 6:05:09 AM PDT by MarkL (Al Gore: The Greenhouse Gasbag! (heard on Bob Brinker's Money Talk))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

True enough - but I think most of us have learned long ago what is meant by “economic justice” - it’s just marxism dressed up in fancy clothes.


6 posted on 08/21/2008 6:08:48 AM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Obama’s Code Words

Code words for socialism!

7 posted on 08/21/2008 6:16:47 AM PDT by onlylewis (libs want a two class system, one rich one poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

“....As crazy as I am about her, I don’t know that I’d EVER want to face that beautiful lady in court. I have no doubt that we’d have a fully accurate demonstration of “evisceration” of my by a lawyer. Wow, is she smart, and can she be sharp!...”

Agreed. I would not want to have any argument with her. (I’d lose!)

Ever notice that conservative babes tend to be bright, cheerful, and gracious while lib females seem bitter, mean and petty?


8 posted on 08/21/2008 6:17:40 AM PDT by Islander7 ("Common sense and common decency are uncommon virtues among leftist.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

She’s not the one who hosts American’s Election HQ (In John Gibson’s old time slot), is she?


9 posted on 08/21/2008 6:27:28 AM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Journalists should push Obama to drop the code and be forthright about his views

Won't happen. All leftists, including journalists, understand that leftist ideology must remain hidden in order for those who want to implement it to gain the power to do so.

10 posted on 08/21/2008 6:31:21 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

ooh ooh eee ahh ahh tin tang walla walla bin bang.

my friend the witch doctor - he taught me what to say.

my friend the witch doctor - he taught me what to do.


11 posted on 08/21/2008 6:37:15 AM PDT by palomonte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islander7
“...For instance, it’s discrimination that Megyn Kelly won’t marry me...”

Me too. We may have a class action suit, my FRiend!

That's because she is having an affair with me and she doesn't need you two.

12 posted on 08/21/2008 6:40:15 AM PDT by dearolddad (Like $4.00 + gas? Be sure to thank a democrap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
but Rep. Mark Foley (who later left office after sending suggestive messages to congressional pages) proposed an amendment designed to end freedom of staffing for poverty-fighting religious groups receiving federal dollars.

Holy carp, I did not know that about that fool. No wonder the RATs saw him on their gaydar and engineered the fall.

13 posted on 08/21/2008 6:40:47 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Rest In Peace, Capt. Ed "Too Tall" Freeman (1928-2008))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The logic is clear, all right. Take federal funds seized from productive taxpayers, and you have no right to whine about the strings attached.
We all mock nanny state, but there’s a Big Daddy in the picture too. He’s the one saying, “You’re eating at MY table, you will live by MY rules. Don’t like it? There’s the door.”


14 posted on 08/21/2008 7:14:33 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (My spiritual advisor is a lawyer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Obama says “um”, that’s code for “I need a fix”.

“Social Justice” has always been code foe socialism.


15 posted on 08/21/2008 7:15:25 AM PDT by Impy (Spellcheck hates Obama, you should too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
"It is no violation of due process for the government to regulate that which it subsidizes."

That was in a court decision years ago. So many conservatives in the Sixties were called nasty names for saying that "federal control follows federal money", but for all that, they were right, as usual.

Yer in a pretty poor state when yer being bribed with yer own money.

16 posted on 08/21/2008 8:20:36 AM PDT by thulldud (All your rumor are mong to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"Economic justice" and "restoring fairness to the economy"

The siren song of the Communist Vanguard.

Keep your powder dry.

17 posted on 08/21/2008 9:31:36 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (When hopelessness replaces hope, it opens the door to evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson