Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amateurs Outdoing Professionals (Thomas Sowell)
Creators Syndicate ^ | August 19, 2008 | Thomas Sowell

Posted on 08/19/2008 1:01:58 PM PDT by jazusamo

When amateurs outperform professionals, there is something wrong with that profession.

If ordinary people, with no medical training, could perform surgery in their kitchens with steak knives, and get results that were better than those of surgeons in hospital operating rooms, the whole medical profession would be discredited.

Yet it is common for ordinary parents, with no training in education, to homeschool their children and consistently produce better academic results than those of children educated by teachers with Master's degrees and in schools spending upwards of $10,000 a year per student— which is to say, more than a million dollars to educate ten kids from K through 12.

Nevertheless, we continue to take seriously the pretensions of educators who fail to educate, but who put on airs of having "professional" expertise beyond the understanding of mere parents.

One of the most widespread and dramatic examples of amateurs outperforming professionals has been in economies that have had central planning directed by highly educated people, advised by experts and having at their disposal vast amounts of statistical data, not available and probably not understandable, by ordinary citizens.

Great things were expected from centrally planned economies. Their early failings were brushed aside as "the growing pains" of "a new society."

But, when centrally planned economies lagged behind free market economies for decade after decade, eventually even socialist and communist governments began to free their economies from many, if not most, of the government controls under central planning.

Almost invariably, these economies then took off with much higher economic growth rates— China and India being the most prominent examples.

But look at the implications of the failure of central planning and the success of letting "the market"— that is, millions of people who are nowhere close to being experts— make the decisions as to what is to be produced and by whom.

How can it be that people with postgraduate degrees, people backed by the power of government and drawing on experts of all sorts, failed to do as well as masses of people of the sort routinely disdained by intellectuals?

What could be the reason? And does that reason apply in other contexts besides the economy?

One easy to understand reason is that central planners in the days of the Soviet Union had to set over 24 million prices. Nobody is capable of setting and changing 24 million prices in a way that will direct resources and output in an efficient manner.

For that, each of the 24 million prices would have to be weighed and set against each of the other 24 million prices. in order to provide incentives for resources to go where they were most in demand by producers and output to go where it was most in demand by consumers.

In a market economy, however, nobody has to take on such an impossible task. Each producer and each consumer need only be concerned with the relatively few prices relevant to their own decisions, with coordination of the economy being left to supply and demand.

In short, amateurs were able to outperform professionals in the economy because the amateurs did not take on tasks beyond the capability of any human being or any manageable group of human beings.

Put differently, "expertise" includes only a small band of knowledge out of the vast spectrum of knowledge required for dealing with many real world complications.

Nothing is easier than for experts with that small band of knowledge to imagine that they are so much wiser than others. Central planning is only the most demonstrable failure of such thinking. The disasters from other kinds of social engineering involve much the same problem.

Surgeons succeed because they stick to surgery. But if we were to put surgeons in control of commodity speculation, criminal justice and rocket science, they would probably fail as disastrously as central planners.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial
KEYWORDS: economics; education; govwatch; healthcare; homeschool; medicalcare; sowell; thomassowell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

1 posted on 08/19/2008 1:01:59 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

IBTP!

Sowell rules!


2 posted on 08/19/2008 1:04:30 PM PDT by day10 (Rules cannot substitute for character.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AbeKrieger; abigail2; Alia; Amalie; American Quilter; arthurus; awelliott; Bahbah; bamahead; ...
*PING*
Thomas Sowell

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Recent columns
Georgia On Our Mind
Whose “Special Interests“?
The Galbraith Effect?

Please FReepmail me if you would like to be added to, or removed from, the Thomas Sowell ping list…

3 posted on 08/19/2008 1:04:51 PM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: day10

You made it. :)


4 posted on 08/19/2008 1:05:52 PM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The same could be said about Freepers and the Pajamamedia outdoing “professional” journalists. Dan Rather wishes it weren’t true. Now some of us are focused on Obama’s birth certificate forgery and the MSM is in deep silence/whistling past the graveyard mode.


5 posted on 08/19/2008 1:10:24 PM PDT by Kevmo (A person's a person, no matter how small. ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

A child who is home schooled, on average, is a different kind of child than one who goes to government schools.

Most important, the child who is home schooled has highly motivated parents. The child shares the genetics and the values of the dedicated, hard-working parents. Many kids in the government schools, on the other hand, have absent and/or unmotivated parents.

It’s not necessarily the teachers who are bad, it’s the self-selection into homeschooling or into government schools that makes the difference.


6 posted on 08/19/2008 1:12:10 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“When amateurs outperform professionals, there is something wrong with that profession”

That is why acting is not a profession. If a 9 year old girl(Tatum O’Neil) or a first time actor practicing physician(Dith Prang)can win the ultimate of awards, how difficult is that “profession”.


7 posted on 08/19/2008 1:15:16 PM PDT by Cyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Right on the money. It probably wouldn’t be that way if professional journalists were objective and honest, but...


8 posted on 08/19/2008 1:16:21 PM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

There is obviously something wrong with the “professional” (ie, government) system if the parents who are dedicated and involved and care about their children’s education will not choose that system, often at great personal expense and sacrifice.


9 posted on 08/19/2008 1:17:14 PM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

Excellent point. The overwhelming majority of home schooled kids have parents that really care and are willing to make that sacrifice. Those kids have a big advantage to start with over the kid whose parents use schools as day care.


10 posted on 08/19/2008 1:21:20 PM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, the paradigm and geopolitical/culture under which the public education system was created and nurtured expired a LONG time ago.

Public schools are obsolete.

Radio killed the Rock Star and the Internet (supercharged by google) killed public schools. They just don’t know it yet.


11 posted on 08/19/2008 1:21:44 PM PDT by RobRoy (This is comical)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

>>The same could be said about Freepers and the Pajamamedia outdoing “professional” journalists.<<

When I first laid eyes on the thread title, that is what I though it was going to talk about.


12 posted on 08/19/2008 1:22:30 PM PDT by RobRoy (This is comical)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cyman
That is why acting is not a profession. If a 9 year old girl(Tatum O’Neil) or a first time actor practicing physician(Dith Prang)can win the ultimate of awards, how difficult is that “profession”.

Well, if the Oscars were based on actual acting craft, members of the Royal Shakespeare Company would win every year. They are a popularity contest for insiders, not a professional award.

13 posted on 08/19/2008 1:23:23 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("One man's 'magic' is another man's engineering. 'Supernatural' is a null word." -- Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Surgeons succeed because they stick to surgery. But if we were to put surgeons in control of commodity speculation, criminal justice and rocket science, they would probably fail as disastrously as central planners.

So absolutely true. Just because someone is intelligent or gifted in one area does not mean that that necessarily applies to other areas. Case in point: the masses of liberal college professors who think they all know better than anyone else how the world should work solely because they're respected as an expert in their field. It's sheer arrogance, which unfortunately too many people don't realize.

Then there's Thomas Sowell, who actually does display brilliant logic and understanding of a wide variety of things in life, but would be the first person to admit he doesn't know everything. I'd be tempted to disagree with him, though, because I sometimes wonder if there's anything the man doesn't know or isn't right about.
14 posted on 08/19/2008 1:23:55 PM PDT by According2RecentPollsAirIsGood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

So true, the internet makes home schooling much easier. I have the world at my fingertips. Computers in general help, too, with the tremendous variety of CD Roms available on each subject, video streaming, satellite schools. . .


15 posted on 08/19/2008 1:25:08 PM PDT by Marie2 (Everything the left does has the effect and intent of destroying the traditional family.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
The public schools have a racket with "teacher certification". I have been a college professor for 9 years and am working on a doctorate yet I am "not qualified" to teach in a public school because I am not certified. To get certification I would need to take close to two years of college classes in education taught by people who haven't been in a classroom for 20 years and who are technologically illiterate to to computer the teaching technologies I use every day.

I know a student who was majoring in chemistry and wanted to teach chemistry in high school. Despite having taken rigorous chemistry, math and physics classes for her chemistry major she was still required to take a bonehead science class for teachers in order to get her teaching degree. Sadly a student who only took this bonehead science class would be fully qualified to teach high school chemistry in many states.

No wonder our students do so poorly.

16 posted on 08/19/2008 1:25:08 PM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyman

Many years ago it was easy for everyone to know who the best actors were without any awards, now I wonder if there are any good ones. :)


17 posted on 08/19/2008 1:26:39 PM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Marie2

Yep. Imagine the government literally PAYING FOR a high speed internet connection to every home with school age children as well as a FREE COMPUTER and Base Station.

Instead of $10k a year, it would be around $1500 and the quality of education each child gets would be determined by the involvement of the parents, or lack thereof. This is putting responsibility and control back in the parents hands, where it belongs.


18 posted on 08/19/2008 1:30:09 PM PDT by RobRoy (This is comical)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

But what ever would we do without those professional politicians selflessly guiding us through our pathetic, hum-drum little lives?


19 posted on 08/19/2008 1:30:12 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: According2RecentPollsAirIsGood

I love to read Dr. Sowell’s columns regarding educators and the elitism that exists in higher learning, he pulls no punches.


20 posted on 08/19/2008 1:30:35 PM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson