Shuster looks down his nose at National Enquirer ping to Today show list.
Isn’t this the same clown who was nutted by the Hillary contingent for observing that the Clintons had pimped out “little” Chelsea?
Fweh - and we used to think Shuster was a good guy. Way back during the Gary Condit-Chandra Levy mess, Shuster was working for Fox News, and doggedly pursued Condit all over the place, literally sticking his mic into Condit’s face, trying to get answers.
If this is a story about my neighbor, or some entertainer, then I’d agree its a non-story. Leave people alone.
But this is a guy who wanted to be president, and probably still had a shot at being vice-president. His wife is very famously and tragically dying of cancer. This is relevant.
When you remember back a few years when the press went round and round endlessly trying to decide whether GW had ever used drugs back during his substance abuse days, their protestations of journalistic prudery are not very believable.
The pot calling the flatware black.
(Can I say ‘black’?)
A credible journalist would say, “There’s a lot more to this story, it’s not going to end anytime soon, and WE will be all over it, covering it like a rug.”
Money, paternity, silent benefactors, payment to Hunter, why didn’t she list father on birth certificate, TAX related issues, response by Edwards wife, response by Andrew Young’s wife, response by Obama, response by Hillary (and when did she know about it), response by the DNC, response by Washington Post, NYT, LA Times, AND, should we believe anything Edwards has to say EVER AGAIN...
Just for starters...
Shuster, what a colossal jerk you are. No wonder you got fired from Fox.
Gee, David. Maybe journalism is more than badgering Republicans to feed your enormous MSM egos, maybe it actually involves a little shoe leather.
Look out Enquirer, the long knives are out for you now. I’ve always said the Enquirer is more reliable than the MSM.......
I saw Schuster remark several times about the “questionable reporting” of the Enquirer. His contempt was palpable.
As I noted on the other thread, I’m not sure what Shuster calls himself, but it can’t be “journalist.” A journalist doesn’t just rely on politicians’ “fixers” for their information. Doing that would make one a spokesman for the politician.
The media has dna stains on their collar from the treatment they gave Edwards and the DNC.