Posted on 08/07/2008 5:16:24 AM PDT by Red Badger
NANCY, CAN YOU HEAR US NOW????????................
If you want ON or OFF the DIESEL KnOcK LIST just FReepmail me.....
This is a fairly HIGH VOLUME ping list on some days.....
All us professional Democrat oil driller/politicians know this for a FACT.
http://www.denverpost.com/ci_4530946
Something you may want to read. There are studies showing this extraction method yields sub $28 a barrel cost.
Somewhere there are probably Democratic scientists that have been tasked with finding microbes that require the shale to exist, thus endangering them if we mine it.
Hey, it’s not any more far fetched than some of the crap coming out of their camp lately...
According to British Petroleum's Statistical Review of World Energy, in 2007 Saudi Arabia reported it had 264 billion barrels (42×109 m3) of estimated oil reserves, around 21% of the world's conventional oil reserves
We've got more than 3x as much as the Saudis, but we allow ourselves to be held hostage to the Middle East.
Someone is overlooking the Democrats in Colorado who have been passing statutes to stop oil shale development. This includes Senator Salazar and his Moratorium,
March 13, 2008.
“Today, the United States Senate voted down a Republican amendment to the Senate Budget Resolution that sought to override a one-year moratorium on oil shale development included in the omnibus appropriations bill late last year. The one-year moratorium is necessary to allow states and affected communities to work with the BLM to help restore order to the regulatory process, so that oil shale development can occur responsibly.”
Bakken oil, shale oil, its all the same but it can be extracted now. On page 3 in my website http://www.theusmat.com/I have posted a questionaire asking conservative candidates to include it in their surveys, and to get conservative local talk show to pose it on their shows.
The general public does not now how much oil we have “holed up” in our country thanks to MSM, that knowledge must get out.
Your help is needed
I thought you were going to say that environmentalists will keep the licensing tied up for a billion, trazillion years. );-)
I think we need some sort of permanent presence in Washington that pushes for energy development. The environmental lobby has too much say in what gets done in D.C.
bookmarking
800,000,000,000 barrells of oil?
That is enough for 40,000 years at current consumption of 20,000,000 barrells per day.
So...... what’s the crisis here?
For the Dems, THAT is a crisis!............Fuel and energy independence is to them like a cross and garlic necklace to a vampire!............
Days, not years
bump
Peg the price to some value below world oil prices and guarantee the oil companies $20 per barrel profit. The remaining mineral fee should be directed explicitly toward US debt and be forbidden from use toward current services. This may be more than a chance to be energy independent, it might also reflate the value of the American dollar.
Atsa nice ! What has that got to do with the subject at hand ? Getting the word out to the American people ?
Not 40,000 years but rather 40,000 days. It would be 109 years worth at current usage.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.