Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama: tap nation's oil reserve to help gas prices
wokv.com ^ | 08/04/2008 | By TOM RAUM

Posted on 08/04/2008 7:34:05 AM PDT by Red Badger

Barack Obama is proposing tapping the nation's strategic oil reserves to help drive down gasoline prices, his campaign said Monday.

Obama supports releasing light oil from the emergency oil stockpile now and replacing it later with heavier crude more suited to the country's long-term needs, according to a campaign fact sheet. Light crude oil is easier to refine into gasoline than heavier oil.

Also on Monday, the Obama campaign unveiled a television ad that criticizes Republican John McCain's energy policies.

"After one president in the pocket of big oil we can't afford another," says the ad, referring to President Bush's previous work in the oil industry.

Obama is emphasizing energy and the economy in campaign stops this week in Michigan, Ohio and Indiana, beginning with a speech Monday in Lansing, Mich. Gas prices over $4 a gallon have become a top issue in the presidential contest.

In the past, Obama has not advocated tapping the oil reserve, but campaign spokeswoman Heather Zichal said he has reconsidered. "He recognizes that Americans are suffering," she said.

The nation's strategic petroleum reserve consists of about 700 million barrels in salt caverns in Texas and Louisiana. It was last tapped shortly after Hurricane Katrina. Otherwise, President Bush has refused to use the reserves, saying they need to be left intact as an emergency stockpile. However, in the face of strong congressional pressure, Bush in June stopped filling the reserve until oil prices decline.

The new Obama ad trumpets his proposal to revive a windfall profits tax on energy companies and asserts that McCain favors tax breaks for the oil industry.

"A windfall profits tax on big oil to give families a thousand-dollar rebate," an announcer in the ad says.

Obama has pushed for such a tax to fund $1,000 emergency rebate checks for consumers besieged by high energy costs.

Congress enacted a windfall profits tax in 1980, during an earlier era of high oil prices, but repealed it in 1988 amid concerns the tax was discouraging domestic oil development. Last year, the House approved $18 billion in new taxes on the largest oil companies, but they were blocked by Republicans in the Senate.

The new ad opens with a driver pumping gas. The announcer says, "Every time you fill your tank, the oil companies fill their pockets."

Republicans were quick to pounce.

"Barack Obama's latest attack ads shows his celebrity is matched only by his hypocrisy," said McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds. "After all it was Senator Obama, not John McCain, who voted for the Bush-Cheney energy bill that was a sweetheart deal for oil companies. Also not mentioned is the $400,000 from big oil contributors that Barack Obama has already pocketed in this election."

Alex Conant, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee, said Michigan Republicans planned to go to Obama's Lansing event to pass out tire gauges engraved with "Obama's Energy Plan." That pokes fun at the part of Obama's energy plan calling for people to inflate their tires to the highest correct pressure to help conserve fuel.

Obama has said recently that he would reluctantly consider accepting some new offshore oil drilling. Obama previously opposed any offshore drilling.

Lately, however, he has cited "very constructive" talks between Senate Republicans and Democrats on this issue. He praised a plan unveiled by a group of Republican and Democratic senators to permit drilling while supporting an effort to convert most vehicles to alternative fuels in 20 years.

McCain's campaign accused the Democrat of flip-flopping. However, the Arizona Democrat recently reversed his own former opposition to drilling on the Outer Continental Shelf.

Both candidates have energy proposals to reduce U.S. dependence on oil. Obama's was first, and its centerpiece is a 10-year, $150 billion spending plan focusing on clean coal technology, further development of plug-in hybrid cars, commercialization of wind and solar power and other measures.

McCain's, which is called the Lexington Project, includes building 45 new nuclear power plants; offering a $300 million prize for major advancement of low-cost, plug-in hybrid or electric car technology; and "encouraging the market" in wind, hydroelectric and solar power. Both he and Obama would cut use of fossil fuels to combat climate change.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; drillheredrillnow; drilling; elections; energy; fuel; gas; gasprices; nobama08; obama; obamatruthfile; oil; spr; strategicreserve
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: Eric in the Ozarks
I thought W owned a baseball team...

Yeah, well that, too.

41 posted on 08/04/2008 8:03:47 AM PDT by babyfreep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Neither drilling nor taping SOR’s will do as much in lowering prices as hitting world futures traders in the wallet.

ONLY when they’ve realized significant loss of wealth in other investments and stocks will they realize their exhuberance over oil has cost them much more than they gain.


42 posted on 08/04/2008 8:11:49 AM PDT by azhenfud (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

REmember whin clinton released the reserves when gas prices when up 3 cents?


43 posted on 08/04/2008 8:13:35 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple ( Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Obama’s limitations and incompetence has NOTHING to do with race — he’s simply not very bright or a Marxist dedicated to the destruction of America, or both!

Obama is perhaps the only candidate ever put forward who could make Jimmy Carter look slightly competent.


44 posted on 08/04/2008 8:16:11 AM PDT by river rat (Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

How can they say that a few million barrels from the strategic oil reserve will help and also say that 10’s of billions of barrels from the gulf and ANWR will only help by 2 pennies per gallon. I hope Dem voters are paying attention.


45 posted on 08/04/2008 8:18:49 AM PDT by DungeonMaster ("You can't take $100,000,000,000 to Vegas" speculators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: river rat

Both. They the two terms go hand in hand. To be a Marxist, you can’t be very bright in the first place.............


46 posted on 08/04/2008 8:19:33 AM PDT by Red Badger (If we drill deep enough, we can reach the Saudi oil fields from THIS side..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster

That’s what is so incongruous about the whole thing. On the one hand, they say, “Drilling won’t help.” but on the other they say, “Releasing oil from the Strategic Oil Reserve will help.”
It makes absolutely no sense on any level, and so abundantly so that even an elementary age child could see that it is so...............


47 posted on 08/04/2008 8:22:34 AM PDT by Red Badger (If we drill deep enough, we can reach the Saudi oil fields from THIS side..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
The MSM and the uneducated public are having a serious Obamagasm touting this as a brilliant sensible solution to our high gas prices.

That, and taxing the obscene profits of the evil Bush, Cheney oil companies. They control the world you know. McCain is a brain dead puppet of big business and the Evil oil barons.

Yup, that's what I am hearing out there.

48 posted on 08/04/2008 8:24:10 AM PDT by R_Kangel (`.`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: isrul; Red Badger; Obadiah; peeps36

Thanks for confirming my suspicions. And we all know how anxious a Democratic president and/or Congress will be to replenish any reserves thereby distributed. It would be permanent disarmament as a liberal strategic tool.


49 posted on 08/04/2008 8:26:49 AM PDT by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: R_Kangel

When “O” loses this election, there’s gonna be a lot of BDS people on suicide watch............


50 posted on 08/04/2008 8:27:12 AM PDT by Red Badger (If we drill deep enough, we can reach the Saudi oil fields from THIS side..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: caseinpoint

Remember it was just a couple of months ago the Pelosers wanted the filling of the SOR to be halted, even though they were already 97% full...............


51 posted on 08/04/2008 8:29:37 AM PDT by Red Badger (If we drill deep enough, we can reach the Saudi oil fields from THIS side..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Dumbo! You ain’t gonna be President so just sit down and STFU!


52 posted on 08/04/2008 8:31:23 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avacado

He already thinks he is.....................

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/08/president-obama.html


53 posted on 08/04/2008 8:33:22 AM PDT by Red Badger (If we drill deep enough, we can reach the Saudi oil fields from THIS side..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Yes, we want someone that has no idea of how the oil industry works or how a business runs to fix the problem!


54 posted on 08/04/2008 8:41:09 AM PDT by Holicheese (Hillary deserves the CMoH for her time in Tuzla!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Barack Obama is proposing tapping the nation's strategic oil reserves to help drive down gasoline prices, his campaign said Monday.

Someone might want to point out that A) it's called the Strategic Oil Reserve for a reason, and B) gas has gone down about 40 cents a gallon without it.

55 posted on 08/04/2008 8:43:20 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Holicheese

If you’re not part of the solution, then you must be part of the government............


56 posted on 08/04/2008 8:43:31 AM PDT by Red Badger (If we drill deep enough, we can reach the Saudi oil fields from THIS side..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

That’s a good line, Red.


57 posted on 08/04/2008 8:47:06 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Obama on the President's Decision to Release Oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (Flashback)

Another flip, Obama On Strategic Oil Reserve, July 7, 2008

58 posted on 08/04/2008 8:47:57 AM PDT by EdReform (The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed *NRA*JPFO*SAF*GOA*SAS*CCRKBA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“Barack Obama is proposing tapping the nation’s strategic oil reserves to help drive down gasoline prices, his campaign said Monday.”

I bet Nancy bitched him out for favoring drilling. Made her look bad.


59 posted on 08/04/2008 8:52:22 AM PDT by y6162
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
That’s what is so incongruous about the whole thing. On the one hand, they say, “Drilling won’t help.” but on the other they say, “Releasing oil from the Strategic Oil Reserve will help.” It makes absolutely no sense on any level, and so abundantly so that even an elementary age child could see that it is so...............

Which leaves us clueless as to whether or not USAmerican liberals see it. But if they are still behind Nancy PullHoseC, they don't see much.

60 posted on 08/04/2008 8:52:28 AM PDT by DungeonMaster ("You can't take $100,000,000,000 to Vegas" speculators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson