Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Click for pics.

ENIGMA Molten glass being worked into an ornament. Understanding glass could lead to better products and offer headway in other scientific problems.(Mark Interrante)

Glass, Up Close

1 posted on 08/03/2008 6:56:52 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem; blam; SunkenCiv

of interest? Ping.


2 posted on 08/03/2008 6:58:54 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Obama: The presumptuous democratic nominee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
(Bloomberg News, top, and Keystone/Corbis)COMPLEX Glass in sheet and molten forms. Glass transition differs from usual phase transition.

Click for pic.

3 posted on 08/03/2008 7:00:30 PM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Interesting article.


4 posted on 08/03/2008 7:06:29 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
They can tell you what the temperature will be, 25 years from now.
They can tell you all about how the eye and ear evolved.

But glass? Well, they're not really sure about that one. No consensus yet.

5 posted on 08/03/2008 7:25:45 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Et si omnes ego non)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
...if cooled infinitely slowly

When does one detect a drop in temperature, at the end of infinity?

6 posted on 08/03/2008 7:32:42 PM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

NYT: “It is well known that panes of stained glass in old European churches are thicker at the bottom because glass is a slow-moving liquid that flows downward over centuries. Well known, but wrong.”

Hmmm. The NY Times writer (or typist) does not cite it but the article is eerily similar to this:

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html

...which is copyrighted, dated 1996, and starts out: “It is sometimes said that glass in very old churches is thicker at the bottom than at the top because glass is a liquid, and so over several centuries it has flowed towards the bottom. This is not true.”


7 posted on 08/03/2008 7:33:39 PM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Stop the O-bomb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The New York Times: Outrageous liberal bias, insipid PC drivel, plus the occasional excellent science article.


8 posted on 08/03/2008 7:37:54 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
"...the arrangement of atoms and molecules in glass is indistinguishable from that of a liquid.."

I thought that glass had more short range order than liquid.

12 posted on 08/03/2008 8:07:50 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president! (it ain't over 'til it's over))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Thanks for the post.

David Chandler, mentioned in the article, is scary-smart.

Rumor has it that when he was at Penn, a gag greeting card was circulated with a drawing of a smug-looking dragon on the front, with the obligatory puff of smoke.

The caption on the inside read, "Ha! Ha! I'm David Chandler, and you're not."

Cheers!

15 posted on 08/03/2008 8:46:38 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

19 posted on 08/03/2008 9:04:39 PM PDT by Inyo-Mono (If you don't want people to get your goat, don't tell them where it's tied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Bump for Monday reading.


22 posted on 08/03/2008 10:07:01 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem; nomorelurker

I loved those “slow glass” sci-fi stories.

Glass fascinates me. Molten glass especially.

I occasionally play with glass in the kiln & furnace. :)


23 posted on 08/03/2008 10:40:33 PM PDT by TxGrandMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Maybe the glass was thicker at the bottom by design, rather than slow flow, or by chance.


28 posted on 08/04/2008 3:58:28 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Five Year Plans and New Deals, wrapped in golden chains...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
It's a liquid!

I took some 3’x4’ glass window pains out of a building that we remodeled that were about 60 years old and miked them and every one of them was thicker at the bottom than at the top.

It definatly is liquid silica.

32 posted on 08/04/2008 5:00:11 AM PDT by dalereed (both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Some people think glass is a slow-moving liquid?


36 posted on 08/04/2008 5:58:07 AM PDT by Impy (Spellcheck hates Obama, you should too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
“Many people tell me this is very contentious. I disagree violently with them.”

LOL!

38 posted on 08/04/2008 3:07:50 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

bump


39 posted on 08/04/2008 3:08:36 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson