Skip to comments.
House Panel: Karl Rove Is In Contempt Of Congress - Ignores House Judiciary Committee Subpoena
WCBSTV ^
Posted on 07/30/2008 8:41:34 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: Sub-Driver
bring it on - defy the 9 percenters
time for a showdown - bush and rove .v. all those voting for this nonsense - loser forfeits everything they own and go to the hoosegow for 15 years
these 9 percenters have held hundreds of ‘investigations’ since they got control of congress and have libby on perjury
time to stop this nonsense and place adults in charge
21
posted on
07/30/2008 8:56:06 AM PDT
by
sloop
(pfc in the quiet civil war)
To: gov_bean_ counter
CNN is right now reporting that Barney Franks wants to legalize marijuana.
22
posted on
07/30/2008 8:57:20 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
(fraud -noun;(1)deceit, trickery, sharp practice, or breach of confidence, (2) Obama)
To: tobyhill
No, I think he said @$$, not grass. You are completely mistaken.
23
posted on
07/30/2008 8:59:13 AM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
( Who is America's George Galloway?)
To: Sub-Driver
Meanwhile, Americans are paying $4.00/gal. for gas...
24
posted on
07/30/2008 9:03:29 AM PDT
by
KansasGirl
( b/c Obama is just creepy.)
To: Sub-Driver
Good to see they’re concentrating on the things that really matter to the country. What exactly are we paying these people for, anyway?
To: sloop
time for a showdown - bush and rove .v. all those voting for this nonsense - loser forfeits everything they own and go to the hoosegow for 15 years Carl versus Nancy would be a whole new "Rove v. Knave"! ;-P
26
posted on
07/30/2008 9:13:13 AM PDT
by
MortMan
(Those who stand for nothing fall for anything. - Alexander Hamilton)
To: Billthedrill
What exactly are we paying these people for, anyway? half are paying them to make them 'feel good'
the other half are paying taxes and looking elsewhere for 'feeling good'
27
posted on
07/30/2008 9:15:33 AM PDT
by
sloop
(pfc in the quiet civil war)
To: Sub-Driver
We need to follow Rove’s lead and everyone start flipping off Washington.
To: TribalPrincess2U
And how is that William Jefferson DEMOCRAT Louisiana thing coming along? fixed
29
posted on
07/30/2008 9:20:55 AM PDT
by
Christian4Bush
(End our long national nightmare. Vote Reid and Pelosi out of leadership.)
To: SE Mom
100%...or dang close if their approval rating goes any lower!!
30
posted on
07/30/2008 9:26:36 AM PDT
by
FlashBack
(www.proudpatriots.org/www.woundedwarriorproject.org/www.moveamericaforward.org)
To: Sub-Driver
Rove engineered two Bush election victories. To this Congress, they are serious crimes.
31
posted on
07/30/2008 9:32:07 AM PDT
by
Jacquerie
(Any conservative who sits out the election will be an accomplice to the criminal Obama regime.)
To: gov_bean_ counter
CNN is right now reporting that Barney Franks wants to legalize marijuana.
No, I think he said @$$, not grass. You are completely mistaken.
VERY GOOD G_B_C!
To: Sub-Driver
The Republicans made the Secret Service testify against Clinton. I knew that was a bad idea — what comes around goes around, so the Republicans have no grounds to complain.
To: tobyhill
CNN is right now reporting that Barney Frank wants to legalize marijuana. I think they misquoted him. What he said was he wanted to "smoke a bone".
34
posted on
07/30/2008 9:38:49 AM PDT
by
andy58-in-nh
(A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves.)
To: Sub-Driver
Rove is in good company. Ninety one percent of the electorate also holds Congress in contempt.
35
posted on
07/30/2008 9:42:36 AM PDT
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
("The land of the Free...Because of the Brave")
To: antiRepublicrat
The secret service perform an entirely different function, CRAT. The secret service testified about their role in protecting the president, not advising him. Nobody forced any lawyer of adviser of Clinton to testify. Nor will any court force Rove to testify either. When secret service agents advise the president, then they are are protected too. Of course, they don’t. BIG difference.
36
posted on
07/30/2008 10:09:37 AM PDT
by
bajabaja
To: Tijeras_Slim
agreed, I have nothing but CONTEMPT for 90% + of congress
37
posted on
07/30/2008 10:14:20 AM PDT
by
McCloud-Strife
(McCain-Obama, No matter who wins, we lose)
To: Sub-Driver
...that Rove had broke the law... Wow.
It's amazing what passes for professional writing. I'm surprised "had" wasn't "done" instead.
38
posted on
07/30/2008 10:17:34 AM PDT
by
TChris
(Vote John McCain: Democrat Lite -- 3% less liberal than a regular Democrat!)
To: andy58-in-nh
This is right up his alley. Barney Frank has been puffing on bongs for years.
39
posted on
07/30/2008 10:21:14 AM PDT
by
reagan_fanatic
("And how can this be? For I am the Kwisatz Haderach! " - Barack Obama)
To: Sub-Driver
Unless I really wanted to be there, I’d ignore a congressional subpoena. On the other hand, one wouldn’t be needed if I wanted to be there.
Rove can always do what the one WH lawyer aide did. She said she would invoke her 5th Amendment rights against self-incrimination even though she did nothing wrong. Lots of advantages to taking that position, including not having to hire an attorney.
If you want to know why you should NEVER talk to the authorities, the IRS or law enforcement, watch this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson