Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush OKs Execution of Army Death Row Prisoner
AP ^ | Monday, July 28, 2008 | DEB RIECHMANN

Posted on 07/28/2008 6:44:59 PM PDT by freema

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last
To: freema
Good. Finally. During my years working in the prosecution in Army JAG offices, we got a few death convictions. But, we also knew that the chances the pukes would be executed were slim as this was the reason. Finally, a president with a set of balls finally signs to execute these pigs. Bush's Texas execution thought of mind helps here. I hope they do it quickly before the left can stop it.
61 posted on 07/29/2008 6:41:04 AM PDT by RetiredArmy (Obama is the biggest threat too your freedom, liberties and pocket book since FDR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood
Am I the only one who is slightly disturbed by the moustache of the guy on the right?

That moustache is the result of a poorly considered regulation. The regulation concerning moustaches states something to the effect that the moustache cannot extend further than the corners of the mouth. Many folks in the Army take that to the extreme and will gig a soldier if his moustache is anywhere close to the border. As a result, many soldiers end up with a Hitler looking moustache in their attempts to make sure their moustaches are nowhere near the corners of their mouths.
62 posted on 07/29/2008 6:43:06 AM PDT by contemplator (Capitalism gets no Rock Concerts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: freema

Good.


63 posted on 07/29/2008 7:56:50 AM PDT by rintense (McCain can pound sand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freema
Gray has appealed his case through the Army Court of Criminal Appeals (then known as the U.S. Army Court of Military Review) and the Court of Appeals for the Armed Services. In 2001, the Supreme Court declined to hear the case.

Nice that he has that option. Something his victims didn't have.

He can dish it out but not take it.

Hang him high.

64 posted on 07/29/2008 8:04:41 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freema

Great. It only took twenty years.


65 posted on 07/29/2008 8:06:41 AM PDT by Natchez Hawk (America First!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freema
Shove him up against the wall at dawn, give him a cigarette, blindfold him, stick a Nicorette patch on his arm.....and fire away.

Leni

66 posted on 07/29/2008 8:33:02 AM PDT by MinuteGal (A Hottie Contest In Progress on Freepathon Thread. See #'s 665, 668 & 838. Be a WINNER for FR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Dont understand your train of thought
What does this have to do with Bush or Iran
This POS raped and killed (at least two of the women were army privates)
Death is what you deserve


67 posted on 07/29/2008 8:42:44 AM PDT by mouse1 (DRILL OR GET OFF THE HILL!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood; contemplator
I've met not a few men in my life who wear small mustaches, not necessarily by choice, but to hide cleft lip surgery. Year ago, the surgery was not as good as today and some disfiguring scars remain for life.

Fine actor and TV narrator, Stacey Keach, is one such mustache wearer. He was born with a cleft lip and a partial cleft of the hard palate. In his business, it was almost a necessity to camoflage all the scars from operations he underwent.

Leni

68 posted on 07/29/2008 8:46:03 AM PDT by MinuteGal (A Hottie Contest In Progress on Freepathon Thread. See #'s 665, 668 & 838. Be a WINNER for FR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: bigheadfred
What is the method of execution, these days?
69 posted on 07/29/2008 8:58:23 AM PDT by isrul (Help make every day, "Disrespect a muzzie day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BnBlFlag
That's our boy.
70 posted on 07/29/2008 8:59:51 AM PDT by isrul (Help make every day, "Disrespect a muzzie day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: isrul
Lethal injection.

(Chapter 3)

71 posted on 07/29/2008 9:06:16 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: dighton
Aw shucks :(
72 posted on 07/29/2008 9:15:07 AM PDT by isrul (Help make every day, "Disrespect a muzzie day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: mouse1

Historically, US Presidents only permit military executions when there is a need for it unrelated to the crime.

Very few people are aware that the purpose of the UCMJ is not justice, but “to maintain order and discipline in the military”. For this reason, in the military, punishments are very different from what they are in the civilian world. For example, under some circumstances, even homicide may result in less punishment than say, homosexual rape.

I mentioned the case of Pvt. Eddie Slovik, because it is an odd one.

He deserted his unit, which was not uncommon during WWII, and was arrested. While desertion can be a capital offense, out of hundreds of cases, only Slovik was chosen to be executed. But this was done not directly because of his crime, but because military morale was very low. It was felt that the execution of a deserter would prevent other soldiers from considering desertion.

However, after his death sentence was confirmed, the Battle of the Bulge took place, as well as the Malmedy massacre. The US jumped on this situation to use as a propaganda tool, even bringing in extra bodies to make the photographs more graphic. To this day, the memorial includes the name of a local Belgian man who had died a few days before of pneumonia, but was dressed in a US Army uniform as a massacre victim. His siblings were still alive in the 1980s, and ran a nearby restaurant.

Because of the massacre, soldiers would not want to surrender to the Germans for fear of being killed, which raised morale significantly. In turn, this meant that the execution of Pvt. Slovik was unnecessary.

However, Slovik was a world-class dumbass. The military offered him a deal that, instead of execution, if he would just state that he had been separated from his unit, and would agree to return to his unit, his conviction would be overturned and all would be forgiven.

He was adamant that he had NOT been separated, but had deserted, and would desert again if given the chance. This left the military no choice but to execute him, and they did.

The current case that President Bush has selected is not special. Of the eight prisoners currently on military death row, their crimes are not simple homicide, but truly horrific crimes. And yet, only now, in the last year of the W. Bush Presidency, after having been “executable” for the better part of 20 years, is he to be executed.

Why? One and only one reason. Iran.

If the US, or Israel and the US, are involved in a war with Iran, many soldiers will want to quit. They are tired, and “fatigue makes cowards of us all”.

And you’ll note that before W. Bush approved this execution, he made very sure he had a fresh opinion from the Justice Department of his exact authority in the military judicial system process as to approving capital punishment.

This is very good prior planning.

If we do get into a war with Iran, there are going to be problems in the military, including desertions. And Bush wants everybody to be crystal clear that if he has to execute some deserters to stop desertion, if it become a problem, then he will do it.

“Currently, under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 14 offenses are punishable by death. Under the following sections of the UCMJ, the death penalty can be imposed at any time:

94 - Mutiny or sedition
99 - Misbehavior before the enemy
100 - Subordinate compelling surrender
101 - Improper use of countersign
102 - Forcing a safeguard
104 - Aiding the enemy
106a - Espionage
110 - Improper hazarding of vessel
118 - Murder
120 - Rape and carnal knowledge

Four provisions of the UCMJ carry a death sentence only if the crime is committed during times of war:

85 - Desertion
90 - Assaulting or willfully disobeying superior commissioned officer
106 - Spies
113 - Misbehavior of a sentinel or lookout”


73 posted on 07/29/2008 9:33:42 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

What else does he do but squawk?


74 posted on 07/29/2008 9:45:30 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: BnBlFlag
You mean the “test case” that got a ruling that Texas can go tell the U.N. world court to GTAFF? Hmmmm. Maybe there is more to the story that you are not seeing.
75 posted on 07/29/2008 9:55:28 AM PDT by allmendream (If "the New Yorker" makes a joke, and liberals don't get it, is it still funny?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
Why? One and only one reason. Iran. If the US, or Israel and the US, are involved in a war with Iran, many soldiers will want to quit. They are tired, and “fatigue makes cowards of us all”.

I was in complete agreement with you until these statements. If such an event should occur, you can safely count on our all-volunteer force to do whatever is necessary. I seriosuly doubt any commanders in the Armed Forces are worried about the sort of wholesale desertions on the level which would cause such a preemptive action as you described. Just my opinion. The fact that our force is an all-volunteer one cannot be overestimated, those men and women are there because that's where they asked to be.
76 posted on 07/29/2008 10:36:04 AM PDT by contemplator (Capitalism gets no Rock Concerts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: contemplator

However, you assume that our force could *continue* to be an all-volunteer force if we went to war with Iran. And while it is unlikely that this would be a problem for a while, W. Bush is creating a precedent that could be used by John McCain, if Iran proved to be harder than anticipated.

Despite the snarky comments about Bush’s intelligence, he has a masterful sense of prior planning and laying the groundwork for the future. Before his first primary race for President, he had already sewed up every major Republican contributor, so the primary was decided before it had begun. At the same time, he arranged to build his Crawford Ranch “Texas White House”, that was finished just before he gave his oath of office.

I might add, that there is another benefit of insuring that the President has a clear path to approve executions: the al-Qaeda prisoners at Guantanamo. The ones convicted so far have gone to Florence, Colorado, but some to be tried in the future could receive the death penalty.

Since they are getting military trials, instead of their appeals going up through the civilian courts, they might need to go through the military appeals chain.


77 posted on 07/29/2008 11:43:31 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: freema
This shouldn't be a surprise to anyone. During the third Bush v. Gore debate in 2000 (the townhall-style one), Bush was asked a question from the audience regarding his approval of death penalties as governor of Texas. Bush's answer was: "As governor, his job was to verify that the process was followed properly. If the person had a fair trial, was given all his appeals, and the process was followed appropriately, then he would approve the execution."

-PJ

78 posted on 07/29/2008 12:34:28 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Obama "citizen of the world" is the 2008 version of Kerry's "global test.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freema

Yeah, the President made his share of mistakes. The saying in business goes: Lack of research kills.

But this President was treated beyond disrespectfully, it was a coup de’etat. President Bush, you now have nothing to lose to have some heads roll at the White House. You will protect the American people to the last but that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t fulfill your promise to get rid of the snakes in Justice or your own cabinet that betrayed you. You acted compassionately and assigned trust, trust of the entire American citizenship and this was betrayed along with yourself.

Humiliate and fire them. You will be doing all of us a very big favor so We the People don’t have to deal with them for the next four years. October surprise should have a new meaning for you my friend :)


79 posted on 07/29/2008 4:56:37 PM PDT by iThinkBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Agreed. Treason is treason and no reason to waste American’s taxpayers dollars debating whether it’s politically correct to fry a black man. White, black, purple, yellow. A murderer of his own people is called a traitor. Give a fair trial, bring out to the back of fence and shoot with high caliber rifles.


80 posted on 07/29/2008 5:00:18 PM PDT by iThinkBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson