Posted on 07/09/2008 4:32:10 AM PDT by johnstown
The Episcopal Church has been at the forefront of baptizing active homosexual lifestyle as God-blessed.
Since 1960, that denomination has decreased in membership by 48%.
The United Methodist Church has been roiled by those adamant on establishing homosexual lifestyles as Christian legitimate. In the fight for one side or another that denomination has decreased in membership by 25%.
The Presbyterian Church (USA) has likewise been embroiled in the tussle. That denomination has decreased in membership by 44%.
The Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) has also been riddled with in-house fighting over homosexual lifestyles as anti-God or pro-God. That denomination's membership has decreased 74%.
The Evangelical Lutheran Church of America has permitted the fight to be more open, some in administration arguing homosexual lifestyles as okay with God. That denomination's membership has decreased by 31%.
The United Church of Christ (Congregational) has defended aggressively homosexual activity as totally legitimate in the definition of "Christian." In the last 40 years, that denomination has lost 40% of its original membership.
By contrast, denominations preaching the Bible as divine revelation, openly stating their love for homosexuals but their disdain for homosexual activity, have grown in membership and church attendance.
For instance, the Southern Baptist Convention has increased in membership by 76% according to the National Council of Churches statistics for 2007.
Read James L. Clark's "The Church Homosexual Problem" at http://www.postchronicle.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi?archive=75&num=153523
You might want to go back and read it again. Jesus said that those who divorce and remarry commit adultery against their former spouse. He was quite clear on that. Baptists don't seem to accept His teachings in that area.
And what, or who, decides which sin is worse?
I would point out that this 1965 peak in membership coincides with the end of the baby boom and the beginning of nationwide commercial availability of oral contraception - a recreational drug whose most avid users were middle class WASPs.
The numbers of these denominations aren't just smaller, their average age is much higher now than it was in 1965.
Indeed. I have een spoken to some ministers who openly confess that they no longer believe in God.
So it must have become just a pofession instead of a calling. Would you want to be a member of a congregation ministered by such a person? It is my understanding that this is not an uncommon situation.
One of the enticements PCA representatives offered to encourage Highland Park members was that in the PCA, the presbytery would never try to take control over the church property from a recalcitrant congregation, as it would permanently belong to the congregation. PCA congregations have left to join other denominations from time to time without any action to restrain them. PCUSA congregations have had to fight hard to prevent interference from the presbytery.
Now perhaps the PCUSA is bluffing, but I understand the national headquarters has raised a war chest of $2 million to fight secessionist congregations in the civil courts.
...Our Presbytery stands firm on the section of the PCUSA Constitution that specifies property of the church is held by Presbytery in trust for the denomination...with an annual budget of only $70K there’s little chance of our congregation prevailing in court...and even if we did, it’s improbable that settlement money could be raised to buy back our freedom....Presbytery knows this, and I doubt they lose much sleep over what the “Wee Kirks” might do.
...what they do take seriously however, is open defiance by a powerful church like Highland Park that Wallace mentions in post #105...they know that such a church could throw lawyers and money at them and never flinch...the problem is, litigation drains both sides....my sense is that the denomination is slowly shifting towards a “go in peace” attitude....the following information comes from the 218th General Assembly held last month:
“Gracious response to churches leaving.
The Assembly also considered a Commissioner Resolution that urges a gracious, pastoral response to churches wanting to leave the PC(USA). In commenting on the resolution, Minister commissioner the Rev. Robert Austell of Charlotte Presbytery observed that the resolution intends to underscore that “we are more interested in shepherding the ship with grace than with litigation.” Item 04-28 was approved with a vote of 519-157-8.”
I'll believe that when I see a change in the actions of Louisville and their lackies at the Synod level. The $2million litigation fund suggests otherwise.
what they do take seriously however, is open defiance by a powerful church like Highland Park that Wallace mentions in post #105
The previous pastor left HP in a weakened position in dealing with the denomination (he could have pulled an almost unified church out to the denomination of his choice in 91, but his ego and personal feelings got in the way.) But I don't see how HP can avoid a move to the EPC in the next few months. I would guess that the Presbytery would let them go in exchange for a cash payment which they could then use to whip the smaller congregations into line.
In other words, they committed a sin , when before they felt they had not. Thanks for confirming what I already said.
Today the use of the word “fruits” in that passage has a second meaning.
Yes, here in New England lots of oceanfront and lakefront property has been owned by churches since the original settlers bequeathed them.
Hardly. According to Jesus those who divorce and remarry are living an adulterous life. Not a single sin but continuous.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.