Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SNIFFER DOGS OFFEND MUSLIMS
Daily Express ^ | Sniffer dogs could be banned Friday June 27,2008 | By Tom Whitehead, Home Affairs Correspondent

Posted on 07/04/2008 11:35:46 AM PDT by Eurotwit

POLICE sniffer dogs trained to spot terrorists at railway stations may no longer come into contact with Muslim passengers – after complaints that it is against the suspects’ religion.

A report for the Transport Department has raised the prospect that the animals should only touch passengers’ luggage because it is considered “more acceptable”.

In the Muslim faith, dogs are deemed to be spiritually “unclean”. But banning them from touching passengers would severely restrict their ability to do their job.

The report follows trials of station security measures in the wake of the 2005 London suicide bomb attacks. In one trial, some female Muslims said the use of a body scanner was also unacceptable because it was tantamount to being forced to strip.

British Transport Police last night insisted it would still use sniffer dogs – which are trained to detect explosives – with any passengers regardless of faith, but handlers would remain aware of “cultural sensitivities”.

Critics said the complaints were just the latest example of minority religions trying to force their rules and morals on British society.

Tory MP Philip Davies said: “As far as I am concerned, everyone should be treated equally in the face of the law and we cannot have people of different religious groups laying the law down. I hope the police will go about their business as they would do normally.”

News of the security setback came as the Government yesterday admitted that installing 100 per cent airport-style screening at rail and Tube stations was “not feasible”.

Instead extra sniffer dogs and X-ray machines will be used to search passengers.

During the trials, passengers stopped in London had the exterior of their bags checked by dogs. But in Brighton, dogs patrolled the station concourse and were walked past passengers by their handlers.

The report concluded: “The use of sniffer dogs was generally problem­atic for Muslim respondents on rel­igious grounds if there was the potential for the dog to make direct contact with them.”

When Muslims have washed for certain forms of worship, they would have to repeat the ritual if they came into contact with a dog.

One young Asian man told re­searchers: “We are not supposed to have dogs. It is against our religion.”

Another Asian man said: “I don’t mind dogs in the park or walking near me, but sniffer dogs? I don’t think that’s right, on the station, the way they use them.”

Massoud Shadjareh, chairman of the Islamic Human Rights Com­mission, said even dogs touching baggage would be an issue for a Muslim preparing to pray. But he stressed that it should be easy to allow dogs to check passengers without physical contact.

“There is a way of dealing with this and we just need to be sensitive,” he said.

In another trial on the Heathrow Express platform at Paddington station in London, there were inst­ances when the body scan – which creates an image on a monitor – was considered unacceptable by female Muslims, the report said.

One Muslim woman complained: “Sometimes I wear clothing which is not so tight. It will be shown on (the monitor) and somebody is looking at it. It defeats the whole purpose of me covering up.”

The report, on five rail security trials in 2006, also showed that some Asians and black people felt they could be selected for tests because of their ethnicity.

A Transport Department spokes­man said the use of sniffer dogs was a matter for the police. But he stressed that the report was only a conclusion of passengers’ views.

A British Transport Police spokes­man said sniffer dogs would continue to be used with any passenger but officers would be considerate where appropriate.

He added: “We are obviously aware of, and sensitive to, cultural sensitivities. BTP officers do have the power to stop and search anyone under Section 44 of the Terrorism Act.

“This also covers the use of dog handlers and dogs, which are used to ‘indicate’ any substance they have been trained to detect.

“As a force we obviously look at any or all feedback about how people from all faiths and backgrounds view the use of dogs, and how we can incorporate that into how the dogs and their handlers interact with people.”

Announcing new security measures to screen Tube and mainline rail passengers, the Government said yesterday that surveys had shown the public would be unlikely to accept major delays to journeys.

People also wanted to ensure their personal privacy was protected.

British Transport Police said it was enhancing its existing stop and search capabilities with the use of X-ray equipment for screening bags, along with the deployment of more sniffer dogs. It said a proportion of passengers and their bags would be searched with minimal delay and inconvenience to the public.

Transport Minister Tom Harris said: “We will continue to work with British Transport Police and rail operators to assess the effectiveness and impact of these new measures.

“We will use this evidence, and that from elsewhere in the UK and abroad, to develop further ways of keeping the travelling public secure using proportionate measures.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: dhimmitude; dogs; enemywithin; infiltration; islam; islamuberalles; muslim; sheeruttermadness; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last
To: Eurotwit

The hajis hated it in Iraq, too, when we brought our sniffer dogs into their homes. We told ‘em to shut up and did it anyway.


61 posted on 07/04/2008 12:53:50 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (Personal Methane Reclamation: Break wind for energy independence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit

If the Brits roll over on this, they don’t deserve their freedom.


62 posted on 07/04/2008 12:57:49 PM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit

Muslims offend me and my religion. I shouldn’t have to be around them, sit on seats they have used, used toilets they have used, be forced into close quarters with them, breath the same air they have exhaled.

Now where are my rights? Will the government fear my being offended enough to change the laws or change the manner they use to keep me and my country safe? Fat chance.

This is becoming more and more ridiculous.


63 posted on 07/04/2008 1:00:21 PM PDT by whatshotandwhatsnot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit

Don’t like the dog? Ok, safety round for you.


64 posted on 07/04/2008 1:01:24 PM PDT by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Emmett McCarthy

precisely. We can’t offend them enough, however...


65 posted on 07/04/2008 1:03:56 PM PDT by redhead (B-I-NGO...B-I-NGO...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit
SNIFFER DOGS OFFEND MUSLIMS

I gotta' hand it to the Islamics.

No pretext too small to be "offended".

And thus be granted "more than equal rights" by civilized
Western Democracies/Republics.

This political-correctness B.S. is going to get us all killed.
Or even worse, enslaved to Islam.
66 posted on 07/04/2008 1:05:27 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit
MUSLIMS OFFEND SNIFFER DOGS
67 posted on 07/04/2008 1:08:26 PM PDT by LiberConservative ("Typical" White Guy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redhead

Let each and every one of us resolve to try harder to sufficiently offend these savages and their sychophant stooges. Make it abundantly clear that “allah” ain’t God, dogs are good friends and pigs are damn good eatin’.


68 posted on 07/04/2008 1:12:07 PM PDT by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: waiyu

My thoughts exactly! No trains, no busses, no planes for muslims. Then they will be clean, and we will be safe. Everyone wins.


69 posted on 07/04/2008 1:14:30 PM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Will88
interesting article, thanks for the link.

Happy Independence Day!

70 posted on 07/04/2008 1:17:34 PM PDT by theymakemesick (The war on drugs benefits government agencies, politicians and drug dealers, they don't want to win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit
It offends me every time one of those TSA yahoos pats me down.

Just who the hell do they think they are?

71 posted on 07/04/2008 1:18:17 PM PDT by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Emmett McCarthy
dogs are good friends and pigs are damn good eatin’

Bumper sticker material there.

Happy Independence Day!

72 posted on 07/04/2008 1:20:49 PM PDT by theymakemesick (The war on drugs benefits government agencies, politicians and drug dealers, they don't want to win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit

This is completely ridiculous. If they have to say a prayer after touching a dog, then they can just say the prayer after the police have left with their dog. Problem solved.


73 posted on 07/04/2008 1:23:25 PM PDT by CatherinePPP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit

What the hell is going on in the UK. Have yall lost your minds? Jezz, vote these idiots OUT OF OFFICE.


74 posted on 07/04/2008 1:24:19 PM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: notaliberal

BUMP!


75 posted on 07/04/2008 1:26:26 PM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
Quote:
______________________________________________________________________
I’ve never seen a dog strap on a few kilos of C-4 and walk into a crowded cafe.
______________________________________________________________________
/Quote

Don't give the terrorists any ideas.
76 posted on 07/04/2008 1:28:04 PM PDT by LuxMaker (The Constitution is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, Thomas J 1819)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: theymakemesick

Happy 4th to you as well! As for bumper stickers, I’ve noticed all these signs everywhere about how only “authorized vehicles” are allowed. I figure there’s a big market for bumper stickers which read “Authorized Vehicle”.


77 posted on 07/04/2008 1:30:54 PM PDT by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Will88

Interesting note: A few years ago I attended the State Department’s Foreign Service Institute. I attended class for two weeks as this was part of intensive studies on “Africa.”

The State Department did talk about Arab slave trade in Africa, BUT, and this is rich, the State Department instructor (black female) said black Africans wanted to be taken by Arab slavers because they would be educated, trained and taken care of by the Arabs. They would become teachers, doctors, tradesmen, and would live as a respected member of the family that bought them.

I am not kidding, the State Department taught this as fact.

I was one of three DoD officers in the class of 30-—we were out numbered by the mob and any disagreement was proof we were just uneducated racist rubes, barely able to breath, let alone think.

“Multiculturalism” was just taking off and we were to celebrate the rich vibrant tapestry that made up Africa. Bleah. Having traveled to sub-Saharan Africa and southern Africa, the only thing that I could see that were worth celebrating was the occasional food item and nothing more.

I told the State Department “elites” that they were, basically, nuts.

Didn’t make any friends with them over that remark.


78 posted on 07/04/2008 1:31:20 PM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit

Hey Brits...get some sniffer monkeys. Stop the excuses.


79 posted on 07/04/2008 1:31:27 PM PDT by Earthdweller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit
The Road to Dhimmitude, and islamic subjugation.
80 posted on 07/04/2008 1:32:57 PM PDT by Travis McGee (--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson