Posted on 06/18/2008 9:27:29 PM PDT by tcrlaf
Larry Sinclair–the gay man who’s accused Senator Barack Obama of sharing gay sex and drugs with him in a Gurnee, IL hotel room in 1999–held a press conference at the National Press Club today.
He began the press conference by handing out press packets which contained little new information. He ended up his DC appearance in handcuffs, led away by the DC Police.
He’s currently being held by the DC Police, according to Larry Sinclair Arrested at NPC Press Conference; UPDATE.
[UPDATE at 6:53: Sinclair was arrested by DC Police after 2 US Marshals showed up and presented a warrant from the State of Delaware for Sinclair’s arrest. Montgomery Blair Sibley, who’s had his law license suspended by the District of Columbia and Florida, and who was previously Sinclair’s attorney, reviewed the warrant and then Sinclair was led away.]
Speculation is that the arrest stemmed from a Delaware warrant, although there is also an outstanding felony warrant out for Sinclair from the Pueblo County (CO) Sheriff’s Department.
(Excerpt) Read more at bloggernews.net ...
“I watched the video and Im not sure but the guy looked kinda gay”
Perhaps you didn’t watch the entire video. During the question and answer period Sinclair said that he has been gay all his life.
“I’m about 80-90% certain he is telling the truth.”
I am too. I still do not know what his arrest in DC is all about. He stated in the video about his case in CO and that he will be going to court to provide info and that he knows the case will be dismissed. Who knows? The guy seemed to me to provide enough information that could be checked out. Certainly the media that loves Obama will make sure that Sinclair is trashed.
obumpa
My statement was meant to be facetious...I did see the whole thing
_______________________________________________
And there it is in a nutshell. Career con-men are sociopathic, pathological liars. They are never believable, except to the extremely naive....perhaps pissant should change his name to pollyanna.
LOL
Leni
Then why are Obama’s denials more believable?
______________________________________________
Obama denied Sinclair's accusations? When? Where?
You keep trying to make this a 'believe sinclair or you support obama' referendum. That is childish and disingenuous.
The bottom line here is that sinclair is a career grifter (who has how many aliases, 13?), thief, drug dealer, forger and liar.
Adults know better than to get into bed with the sinclairs of the world. Pissant does not. In fact, Pissant spends his time turning this forum into the Public Relations wing of the Larry Sinclair circus.
Once again you show you don’t know the story very well. For starters, Axelrod admitted to a reporter long ago that they were ‘investigating’ Larry Sinclair. That was part of the reason for Larry’s original lawsuit (which got tossed, since he did not know the first thing about how to properly file a lawsuit). And people within the campaign are helping to coordinate the internet takedown of Sinclair. Sinclair has contacted the campaign on multiple occasions, and they are fully, 100% aware of him and his claims.
So no, Obama has not mentioned a word about it publicly. Good political move to be sure. But investigating Sinclair and sending minions after him is certainly a denial.
Some things to keep in mind (things you would know if you paid attention to the story instead of insulting everyone who thinks there might be some smoke on this thing):
The folks who setup the polygraph, Whitehouse.com, was a former porn spam site up until recently, who had its share of legal trouble.
Whitehouse.com issued a non denial ‘denial’ to Sinclair’s allegations that they received $$ from Axelrod.
They also used an ‘expert’ who misrepresented his phd credentials in US Courts and who continues to call himself Dr. Gelb.
Sinclair has the receipts that he was indeed in the area during the time he claims.
A MSM Chicago reporter verified Sinclair’s story about attending the graduation in question. he gave the name of the reporter at the presser.
He has given the name of the limo driver now.
He has given his phone records to the Chicago PD and gave the name of the detective he is working with at CPD.
He has a signed affadavit to the CPD that restates his allegations.
Obama was in the area as well during that time, even being documented as absent from the Senate on at least one of the days Sinclair was in town, and giving an address to some group on another of the days.
Obama has been asked by the media many times (including by Tim Russert) to give up his records of his Il Senate career. Obama claims he kept no record of meetings, minutes, or his schedule.
And it is not ‘believe Sinclair or you support Obama’. It is your notion that a criminal cannot POSSIBLY be telling the truth because of his past, and on top of it, making the accusations sound as if they are so outlandish that it couldn’t possibly happen. Given Obama’s associations with the gay druggie party animals in the Chicago political machine (See Rezko trial), it is certainly NOT beyond the pale to keep this story alive until it is either proven true or false.
If this testimony and these circumstances surrounded a GOPer, the media would be all over it like a wet suit. My goal, and it should be yours too, is to get to the bottom of it.
I’ll gladly eat crow if it is shown that Sinclair is lying about this.
BTW, the Whitehouse.com ‘expose Larry as a liar’ press conference that followed Sinclair’s press conference was a total bust. They had technical difficulties with the equipment, cut the conference short, and left without taking questions.
So your job is to watch the Sinclair video I posted yesterday (in FR’s Smoky Backroom) then tell me after watching it that he has zero for credibility.
____________________________________
Shove your 'job'. Sinclair has zero credibility to anyone except those too naive or too invested in his game.
Anyone with LE experience, and most discerning adults, know that cretins like Sinclair do not wake-up one day, after decades of living a criminal life, and turn honest, respectable and trustworthy.
A con-man can convince the average person of his integrity when face-to-face, that's how they pay the bills. You are kidding yourself if you think that he can't turn on the sincerity for the cameras.
You may choose to believe him, I've seen too many of his ilk to give any of them the slightest benefit of the doubt.
And, all of the evidence that you tout is meaningless without third party corroboration.
And, you posted earlier that Obama responded to these charges. I'll ask again...Where? When? What exactly did he say?
Well, sally, 3rd party corroboration is what we are looking for. For example, the CPD should be able to tell us if Sinclair’s phone records show calls from phones belonging to Donald Young. Easy to do. Now why hasn’t the media inquired ‘bout that. Maybe they will now.
Should be relatively easy to track down the Multani’s (brothers?, father/son?) who worked for Five Star Limo.
Typical. Can't support any of your own assertions so you act like a sixth grader.
Still waiting for you to back up your claim that Obama responded to your boy's accusations. You haven't provided any support for your own statements...
Why is that?
Nevermind, we know why.
Hey, maybe when your hero gets out of jail you can have a joint conference for the press. Tell all you know then.
Well, sally, you apparently did not read my othere post when I told you that a reporter confirmed months ago that Axelrod admitted to investigating Sinclair, and that the Obama camp has its hands in the internet attacks on Larry. I guess you could call that a ‘no comment’ as opposed to a denial if you want.
----------------------------------------------------
Let's see, Larry (as you call him - pretty friendly) sues Axelrod so Axelrod investigates him. Yep, that's proof. Sinclair is telling the truth.
btw...what exactly is an 'internet attack'. Did they ring his inbox and run away? Or is posting unsubstantiated accusations of casual, anonymous gay sex with drugs involved more like it?
WHo said anything about proof?
Chicago PD has an open case of an unsolved murder, a guy who has given them his phone records & affidavit stating he had calls and texting from the deceased. Easy to check isn’t it? Do you even want to know if Donald Young called LS? Would any reporter want to know?
And just for the record, the lawsuit included the accusation that Axelrod was having him investigated (using a quote from an MSM reporter), so you need to get your timelines straight.
_________________________________
Exactly. Thank you.
Than why argue against a claim no one has made here.
I find it staggering how many trolls showed up on this thread who want to give that homosexual, crack-smoking scumbag Obama the benefit of the doubt. Personally, I think Larry Sinclair has more credibility that Barry Hussein Obama.
Why pimp here for a known criminal (your friend larry) when, after months of bullshit, there is no proof?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.