Posted on 06/02/2008 9:28:06 AM PDT by jrooney
I believe she said, “Why’d he...”
If she said, “Whitey,” she would have said, “Whitey *did* nothing about Jena” not “Whitey do nothing about Jena”.
She may be an America-hating racist, but she is not illiterate.
The woman cannot even talk properly and she wants to be first lady.
Can just see it now, she meets the , well say the Japanese leader and he asks her “so where did that lady go I was just talking to?”
She replies
“she gone .”
he replies
“I see so, would she be coming back?”
Mrs Obama angrily replies with that angry face of her’s.
“She ain’t have en it doin for her”
The first lady is supposed to have class and she certainly has none of that.
I too have seen the same thing happen a few times.
I have asked this before to a black guy from the boxing gym and he said wearing pants way too big so they keep falling down and showing their underpants, talking like he does and walking really slow is cool and gets the , in his words “ the bitc@@@”
Jena
I suppose she forgot about the poor white kid who was beaten so bad by a bunch of black kids so much so he fell unconscious while being kicked on the ground and he has now lost some of his hearing forever .
selective outrage again
Jena, where 6 black males, who “can’t be racists because they lack the power to implement their racism”,
beat ONE white kid within an inch of his life while screaming racial epithets.
Women are always the civilizing factor in any society.
Whatever they are attracted to and will give sex for, is what a male will do.
Be it good behavior and the requirement of marriage,
or sagging your pants, not speaking English, and exhibiting anti-social behavior.
Her comments don’t help her hubby, either way.
Chicago media is in bed with Hussein to a disgusting extent. They’d never publicize Michelle’s hatred of whites.
I have seen the same thing. One set of speech and mannerisms (the “mask”) when around whites, and another when around other blacks. I have read articles about this phenomenon, some blacks consciously do this. Some consider it a way to be “non-threatening” to whites, when they want to make them let their guard down. Then they’ll turn right around when they think we’re not listening and talk about “whitey” and “crackers”. Supposedly we’re that stupid and gullible that we don’t know that some black people do this. It’s racist when whites talk one way around other whites that they wouldn’t around black people, and the same is true when blacks do it.
HA! This is the best rumor the Clinton’s can come up with to slam Obama? This pales compared to the alleged felonies Hillary’s committed. Why isn’t anyone talking about that?
I agree with you. I think there is a tape and they’re going to go with ‘why’d’ mistaken for whitey.
No it isn’t. When they get together they forget about being ‘eloquent’.
As someone posted on another website:
IF this tape exists — and it probably doesn’t — it is likely that it will be clear whether Michelle Obama said “Whitey” or “Why’d he” by considering the next word.
If the next word is “DID” or another word in the past tense, then she was saying “Whitey DID that,” not “Why’d he DID that.”
But if the next word is “DO” or another word in the present tense, then she was saying “Why’d he DO that?”
You can do the same analysis with most other verbs suggested by Obama supporters:
“Why’d he leave” v. “Whitey left”
AND (less clearly)
“Why’d he attack” v. “Whitey attacked”
If it exists, there shouldn’t be any ambiguity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.