Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: shrinkermd
and so, the drum beat continues.... driven on the right by pro-business at any cost, sovereignty be damned RINOs and from the left by those who believe "no human is illegal".
It's enough to make me want to throw up when I realize we're going to have "comprehensive immigration reform" whether it's good for the country or not.
2 posted on
05/24/2008 3:53:37 PM PDT by
Lloyd227
(and may God bless Oriana Fallaci)
To: shrinkermd
WSJ = Wage Suppression Journal
3 posted on
05/24/2008 3:53:46 PM PDT by
Shermy
(Nightmares From My Pastor, A Story of Race and Insanity)
To: Liz; calcowgirl; Calpernia; indylindy; AuntB; Tennessee Nana; pissant; SoConPubbie; bcsco; ...
4 posted on
05/24/2008 3:59:38 PM PDT by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
(If McCain really CAN "win without conservatives," then why do you care if I vote for him or not?)
To: shrinkermd
I am reaffirmed on a regular basis that my cancellation of my WSJ subscription was a good move..
7 posted on
05/24/2008 4:06:31 PM PDT by
bill1952
(I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
To: shrinkermd
If this was 1860, the WSJ would be editorializing for letting the South secede because slavery was such a wonderful base of the economy. These kinds economic whores are why the GOP is sliding into oblivion ---just like its predecessor the Whigs!
8 posted on
05/24/2008 4:08:51 PM PDT by
texican01
To: shrinkermd
Do you feel safer? No, this is an important job and someone competent should really be doing the job of enforcement, not an incompetent fool like certioff.
9 posted on
05/24/2008 4:17:16 PM PDT by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: shrinkermd
> These immigrants are obviously responding to a labor shortage for certain jobs.<
That’s where I stopped reading.
14 posted on
05/24/2008 4:37:41 PM PDT by
Califreak
(Hangin' with Hunter-under the bus "Dread and Circuses")
To: shrinkermd
The elites at the WSJ don’t want to lose their nannies, landscapers, and pool boys. And they certainly don’t want to see employers fined or jailed for employing illegals, which would solve the problem.
To: shrinkermd
It doesn’t matter whether the workers are “willing”, what matters is that they are “illegal”. What is it about identity theft (and other crimes) that the WSJ doesn’t understand???
To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; ..
To: shrinkermd; gubamyster; HiJinx
Federal immigration officials raided an Iowa meatpacking plant this month... Nearly 400 of the plant's 900 employees were arrested on immigration charges. Do you feel safer? Ever since immigration reform died in Congress last year, the Bush Administration has made a show of stepping up enforcement. But do homeland security officials really have nothing better to do than raid businesses that hire willing workers especially in states like Iowa, where the jobless rate is 3.5%? These immigrants are obviously responding to a labor shortage for certain jobs. Giving them a legal way to enter the country would free up homeland security money and manpower to focus on real threats. Reading that you would never know the owners of the plant were scumbags hiring what amounts to indentured servants.
Biggest immig raid ever much worse than you think
21 posted on
05/24/2008 5:17:15 PM PDT by
raybbr
(You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote!)
To: shrinkermd
WSJ—The usual retarded open borders bull from the capitalists without loyalty to America
22 posted on
05/24/2008 5:23:44 PM PDT by
dennisw
To: shrinkermd
I can't speak for other people with an opinion on immigration I will state right up front that I not only want an end to illegal immigration, but a large cut-back in legal immigration. Back to where they must assimilate instead of going into self-perpetuating ghettos. Back to where American citizens are not being harmed by lost jobs.
Back to where immigration is for benefiting America, and not the world.
28 posted on
05/24/2008 5:57:16 PM PDT by
chesley
(Where's the omelet? -- Orwell)
To: shrinkermd
Last year May 2 Wall Street Journal editorializes on the need for the immigrant workers, and to relax the opposition to the illegal aliens here.
Further on that issue Joe Morgenstern reviews the movie ‘Waitress’, and in the review conclusion tells us that writer director actress
Adrienne Shelley is brutally murdered by a construction worker at her office. He avoids letting us know the killer is an illegal alien.
32 posted on
05/24/2008 7:00:31 PM PDT by
dr huer
To: shrinkermd
These immigrants are obviously responding to a labor shortage for certain jobs. BS. I read that the workers were getting $5 an hour. The labor shortage is for workers at that rate. Pay more and plenty of Iowans would be willing to take the jobs.
33 posted on
05/24/2008 7:21:24 PM PDT by
radiohead
(I stood up for Fred at the Iowa Caucus. Where were the rest of you so-called conservatives?)
To: shrinkermd
35 posted on
05/24/2008 8:38:23 PM PDT by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
To: shrinkermd
This is a classic Michelle Malkin Hot Air Vent from June 2007.
http://hotair.com/archives/2007/06/07/new-vent-gorilla-warfare-against-the-open-borders-wsj/
Michelle had commented on the WSJ’s no borders policy, they responded about a "Guerrilla" attack.
Michelle then hoists them with a "Gorilla" attack using the WSJ’s own video showing their hypocrisy with an entire editorial board meeting of middle aged white males, with one woman, sitting on the window sill, no place at the table for her, and one black man, no place at the table for him either. But hey, we're the bigots!
36 posted on
05/24/2008 8:57:46 PM PDT by
RJL
To: shrinkermd
The WSJ is horrible they are the Simon Legree’s of the buggy whip industry with a touch of Goebels. Defending a 19th century sweatshop as the model of American prosperity, what scum, what morons.
37 posted on
05/24/2008 10:15:52 PM PDT by
junta
(It's Poltical Correctness stupid! Hold liberals accountable for their actions, a new idea.)
To: shrinkermd
I will not feel safer til they remove all of the illegal aliens from Southern California.
To: shrinkermd
The bill does nothing to increase legal immigration, which is the only realistic way to decrease illegal immigration.
Huh. When I lived in Guantanamo Bay, we had very little illegal immigration. There was a fenceline. And some landmines. A whole lot of them. And some US Marines with machine guns. And some heavy artillery. And the waters had sharks. And barracudas.
But we did it without increasing legal immigration.
53 posted on
05/26/2008 10:07:42 AM PDT by
gitmo
(From now on, ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson