Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A quick Senate session blocks Bush appointees
AP via SFGate ^ | 5/23/8 | JIM ABRAMS, Associated Press Writer

Posted on 05/23/2008 3:17:04 PM PDT by SmithL

The Senate is famed for its longwinded debates, but on Friday it took Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown just seconds to stop Republicans in their tracks.

With the Senate entering the first day of its Memorial Day recess, the Ohio senator was briefly in the chair, before a near-empty chamber, to gavel in and gavel out what is called a pro forma session. Without that procedural move, the Senate would technically be adjourned and President Bush could install administration officials or judges as "recess appointments" — without Senate confirmation.

"That's the fastest I've ever done it," said Brown, who like other freshmen does duty as presiding officer when the Senate is in regular session. He said he didn't realize until he got there that the prayer and Pledge of Allegiance, which usually open a session, were dispensed with for pro forma meetings.

"I'm willing to do it," Brown said of showing up when nearly every senator has already left town. "We're not going to let them get away with that kind of abuse of power."

According to numbers provided by the Senate historian's office, Bush had made 165 recess appointments by last fall. That's when Democrats started blocking them with pro forma sessions.

By comparison, former President Clinton had a total of 140 recess appointments over eight years, George H.W. Bush had 77 in his four years and Ronald Reagan 243 in his eight years in office. A recess appointee is allowed to serve until the end of the congressional session, which in this case coincides with the end of the Bush presidency.

The mini-sessions must be held every three days to keep the Senate from officially going into recess. Next Tuesday, Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va., who also got pro forma duty over the New Year holiday because he lives nearby,

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: 110th; bush; congress; obstructionistdems; proformasession; recess; sherrodbrown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Childish Democrats can't even play nice at recess.
1 posted on 05/23/2008 3:17:05 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL
"We're not going to let them get away with that kind of abuse of power."

The gall.

2 posted on 05/23/2008 3:20:05 PM PDT by SolidWood (Refusal to vote for McCain is active support for Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Excuse my French, but if the Constitution provides for the President to make recess appointments, could somebody please tell this buggerf*** of a senator that it is NOT an abuse of power?


3 posted on 05/23/2008 3:21:07 PM PDT by Christian4Bush ("In Israel, the President hit the nail on the head. The nails are complaining loudly." - John Bolton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
For the other twenty-three hours and fifty-nine minutes, the Senate was not in session. President Bush should make his recess appointments during that time.

Hopefully, more Republicans will start to get it, Democrats do not play fair.

4 posted on 05/23/2008 3:21:16 PM PDT by Hoodat (Bull Moose Party Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

For the other twenty-three hours and fifty-nine minutes, the Senate was not in session. President Bush should make his recess appointments during that time.
Hopefully, more Republicans will start to get it, Democrats do not play fair.


They

don’t

care.

With all the perks they get, not only while in office but for the rest of their lives, why would they care?


5 posted on 05/23/2008 3:24:01 PM PDT by Christian4Bush ("In Israel, the President hit the nail on the head. The nails are complaining loudly." - John Bolton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
The anti-American Nazi Democrats are in power and will destroy our great nation with their stupidity and pro al-Qaeda actions.
6 posted on 05/23/2008 3:24:25 PM PDT by YOUGOTIT (The Greatest Threat to our Security is the Royal 100 Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Yes, Bush has made more recess appointments that others. That is becuase of the RATS’ intrasegence. They simply refused to allow him the power that comes with the presidency. The GOP, on the other hand, even approved Ruth Bader Ginsburg.


7 posted on 05/23/2008 3:25:28 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Christian4Bush

Exactly. If this power is in the consitution, then by definition, the president is exercising the recess appointment power properly.

I would love to see if they do this next year to President Obama. I bet not.


8 posted on 05/23/2008 3:25:48 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Well, maybe since the Democrats have deemed these positions unimportant, Bush should issue an Executive Order shutting down each affected department and laying off all of the Democrat beneficiaries of political patronage who work in them. When the screaming gets loud enough, maybe the Senate will suddenly decide those positions are important enough to act on, after all.

I'm just sayin'... ;)

9 posted on 05/23/2008 3:27:45 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("One man's 'magic' is another man's engineering. 'Supernatural' is a null word." -- Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Ginsberg was approved by almost a unanimous vote, as I recall. And on the conservative side, Judge Scalia was also confirmed close to unanimously. Not all Supreme Court appointments become politicized. Bork is the most famous one. Clarence Thomas was another. Then with Roberts and Alito, there was strong Dem. opposition.

Maybe from now on, Supreme Court appointments will be an adversary proceeding.


10 posted on 05/23/2008 3:29:13 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

They are a lazy bunch and good for nothing.


11 posted on 05/23/2008 3:39:08 PM PDT by gunnedah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

Hey, Rove got Bush a Congress he could “work with”—


12 posted on 05/23/2008 3:48:26 PM PDT by Mamzelle (Time for conservatives to go free agent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Too bad the GOP doesn't make it known load & clear - right now, today - that as soon as possible the favor will be returned with this precedent being cited.

Nah, when the time comes they'll act like the statesman-saps they are.

13 posted on 05/23/2008 4:07:54 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
"I'm willing to do it," Brown said of showing up when nearly every senator has already left town. "We're not going to let them get away with that kind of abuse of power."

Abuse of power, indeed. As always, the Democrats accuse the Republicans of doing exactly what THEY actually do.

Bush should go ahead and make recess appointments anyway, and let the Democrats try to fight them.

14 posted on 05/23/2008 4:26:27 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

This is not new. The Craps promised to do this all the way until January, 09.


15 posted on 05/23/2008 4:29:01 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Who would McQueeg rather have mad at him: You or the liberals?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
The mini-sessions must be held every three days to keep the Senate from officially going into recess.

Strange, but I can't find the three day rule in my copy of the Constitution. Can anyone tell me where it comes from?

If the Republicans had any backbone, could enough of them show up at one of these sessions to block the adjournment and push through some Republican bills?

16 posted on 05/23/2008 4:39:03 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy ("I believe in Santa Claus. I believe in the tooth fairy." - John Edwards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Do congresscritters get paid more for each day the house is in session?


17 posted on 05/23/2008 4:39:44 PM PDT by Marak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

“We’re not going to let them get away with that kind of abuse of power.”

Unless, of course, it’s a DhimmiRat in the White House...and then recess appointments won’t even be necessary, let alone be an issue of partisan political playtime.

These arrested-adolescence windbags need to be run out of office...all of them.


18 posted on 05/23/2008 4:58:16 PM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Shame on anyone who stayed home or voted for the OH Dem to teach the GOP a lesson.


19 posted on 05/23/2008 5:28:52 PM PDT by PhiKapMom ( Broken Glass Republican -- http://democratsforsale.blogspot.com/ -- JUST SAY NO to OBAMA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat
For the other twenty-three hours and fifty-nine minutes, the Senate was not in session. President Bush should make his recess appointments during that time.

He can't. The Senate is not in recess. That's the whole reason behind this stunt.

20 posted on 05/23/2008 5:35:12 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson