Posted on 05/22/2008 3:07:07 PM PDT by GourmetDan
I showed you multiple times that Dr. Charlon believes this. Here it is again.
"He said: "That is why such obvious scientific truths have not so far been stated clearly, or have actually been denied."
According to Dr. Charlton, you are in the denier camp. If that infuriates you, take it up w/ him.
Sorry.
Rehash. This was presented last year.
It is obvious that Dr. C believes this, what is not so obvious is your contention that all “evolutionists” believe this.
How could Dr. C control for environmental factors when environmental differences (low class/ upper class) was the entire basis for the grouping in this study?
Yet another Brit blue blood who cannot STAND the fact that their greatest author (William Shakespeare) their greatest Scientist (Michael Faraday) and their greatest warrior (William the Marshal)were all commoners. He now seeks “Scientific” justification for his beliefs, but being a Psychologist, probably doesn't understand even the basics of conducting a Scientific study. Correlation is not causality. Biologically there is no such thing as a “Lower class”.
The end result of what he is saying is “Smart people make more money.” as well as “Educated people with access to wealth power and good schools raise children who end usually end up educated wealthy and powerful.”
Sorry.
That is precisely what liberals think, which is why they want to set up a system where they, as the intellectual superiors, will make all the decisions.
The Center for Public Intellectuals & The University of Illinois-Chicago (UIC)
April 19th-20th, 2002, Conference
[Participants include: William/Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, Sen Barack Obama]
April 19th-20th, 2002
Chicago Illini Union
828 S. Wolcott
This conference is part of the Center's mission of helping to create a more engaged civil society, working towards social change, fostering coalitions between theorists and activists, and combating anti-intellectualism in contemporary culture. It will be both a celebration of ideas and a rigorous examination of the roles and responsibilities that intellectuals play in society.
I. Why Do Ideas Matter? (a keynote panel)
We introduce the “meta” theme of the conference by hearing “success stories” from diverse voices discussing their experiences intervening intellectually.
Timuel Black, Chicago activist; Prof. Emeritus, City Colleges of Chicago
Lonnie Bunch, President, Chicago Historical Society
Bernardine Dohrn, Northwestern University Law School, Children and Family Justice Center
Gerald Graff, UIC, College of Liberal Arts & Sciences
Richard Rorty, Stanford University, Philosophy
III. Lunch and Public Encounters
Alternative breakout tours led by Chicago activists. Tours of Bronzeville and other communities, and visits to organizations that are working on partnering theorists with activists.
IV. Intellectuals in Times of Crisis
Experiences and applications of intellectual work in urgent situations.
William Ayers, UIC, College of Education; author of Fugitive Days
Douglass Cassel, Northwestern University, Center for International Human Rights
Cathy Cohen, University of Chicago, Political Science
Salim Muwakkil, Chicago Tribune; In These Times
Barack Obama, Illinois State Senator
Barbara Ransby, UIC, African-American Studies (moderator)
The Center for Public Intellectuals
University of Illinois-Chicago (UIC):
http://www.uic.edu/classes/las/las400/conferencealt.htm
Bill Ayers, TODAY, April 6, 2008, from his own red communist star-headed website, begging to debate communism vs capitalism with Sean Hannity and STILL calling for revolution!...
"Imperialism. I’m against it, and if Sean Hannity and others were honest, this is the ground they would fight me on. Capitalism played its role historically and is exhausted as a force for progress: built on exploitation, theft, conquest, war, and racism, capitalism and imperialism must be defeated and a world revolution—a revolution against war and racism and materialism, a revolution based on human solidarity and love, cooperation and the common good —must win.
We begin by releasing our most hopeful dreams and our most radical imaginations: a better world is both possible and necessary.
Bunk
I’ve met more than one child of the wealthy who wasn’t to bright but managed to do quite well for themselves and I worked for a guy that became a millionaire from pure hard work an innate ability to delegate and complete lack of ethics and morals
Well obviously you think so, but he made some statements about what evolutionists believe and either don't say or just deny. You're denying it, which is what he said evolutionists did.
Don't freak-out, dude.
Well, it seems to be pretty effective at maintaining liberal status and wealth.
I beg to differ, the working class, well, that eliminates Obama supporters because they don’t work, know crap when they see it. Thats why they hate McCain and Obama.
Have we done a time travel backwards? How ‘bout the working class quit working and dump it into the laps of the elites?
They may think they are smart, they are not smart enough to work hard. What they fear most is the working class rising up against them. That is why illegals, socialist healtcare and all the things liberal are what they are peddling. Global socialists know if they toss out a free crumb here and there, the chances are slimmer that people will rise up and kick their selfish behinds to the curb. They are on borrowed time. The thought about their fate makes me tingle with pleasure.
Are you a mind reader?
Young Ones? I know this pic from somewhere!
I’ve always been told that there is no difference if one is born smart and that the only difference is in the quality of education. Being smart and being educated are two totally different things and you can be very educated without being smart.
And if I remember a central tenet of the Bell Curve correctly, smart people by and large marry other smart people, so this divide in intellectual capability is only increasing over time.
I am afraid that Dr. Charlston would group me as “Upper Class” based upon my income and education and then say that “evolutionarily” I come from superior “Upper Class” genetics. I however was one of those born into poverty who ended up succeeding and thus moving out of the “working class” category. Neither do I consider myself an aberration from my very intelligent “working class” family.
How do these classist blue blood bigots explain that the greatest Scientist (Faraday), Writer (Shakespeare), and Warrior (William the Marshall); all came from “working class” people, while their Crown Prince is a big eared buffoon in love with a horse.
Yes, but it is hard to dispute that on average smart parents are more likely to have smart children outside of considering whatever sociocultural (’nurture’) advantages they may give their on average smarter-than-average kids.
Some of the smartest people I know are 70-80 years old and went no further in school than the eighth grade. Some of the dumbest I know have graduated from college. Common sense can take you a long way in life.
“Reeks of eugenics.”
Reeks of reality - I fixed your typo for you.
;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.