Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/19/2008 5:35:51 AM PDT by Dukes Travels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: Dukes Travels

Vehemently disagree.

McCain would be more damaging to conservatism than Obama. The next 2-4 years are going to be very, very hard. Regardless of who gets elected. However, the man in charge takes the blame.

McCain will be up against a 70 vote majority house and filibuster proof senate. Anyone who thinks a conservative judge will get through is smoking crack. And its entirely possible they’ll defund the war anyway. So what would we end up with? A global warming believing, gitmo closing-captured terrorist coddling, tax hiking (and lying), free speech suppressing, angry socialist.


2 posted on 05/19/2008 5:40:17 AM PDT by Crazieman (Vote Juan McAmnesty in 2008! Because freedom abroad is more important than freedom at home!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dukes Travels

VR shrugs.


3 posted on 05/19/2008 5:44:27 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!"--Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dukes Travels

“Free Trade” conservatives already shrugged, by exporting America’s factories and manufacturing to Communist China.

Atlas cannot shrug, twice. Atlas no longer holds those pillars. Those pillars are now being held up by factory owners named Wang, and Li.

Either conservatives get back to Reagan’s brand of blue-collar conservatism, or democrats will win perpetually from here on.

/rant off


4 posted on 05/19/2008 5:49:00 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (FLEX FUEL NOW! - send your fuel dollars to Kansas, not to Hugo Chavez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dukes Travels
Of the many points that keep the story from being even slightly believable, the main one is when she makes such a clear distinction between the tiny minority that “gets it,” and everyone else. Many of us think like this, but it is both very elitist and very foolish.

You can always smell a McCainiac a mile away. It's the smug odor that screams shut up, sit down, and grow up. Besides, this guy doesn't even look old enough to vote, much less castigate conservatives for not supporting a liberal weenie like McCain.

6 posted on 05/19/2008 5:50:57 AM PDT by TADSLOS (The GOP death march to the gravesite is underway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dukes Travels

This same argument has been posted countless times in the last several weeks. The author of the article makes so many false or half truth statments that it’s hard to say where to start. Let McCain go his own way. I will take no part in voting for him.


9 posted on 05/19/2008 5:52:44 AM PDT by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dukes Travels

13 posted on 05/19/2008 6:00:32 AM PDT by MarineBrat (My wife and I took an AIDS vaccination that the Church offers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dukes Travels

Indylindy also shrugs.

Face it. We all are not going to agree on this election. Some will vote for Juan, some won’t.

Get over it and quit asking folks to vote for a person they do not respect on important issues. Those issues are non negotiable for many.

Obviously Juan does not need our vote anyway. The GOP and the Rat party will be the responsible parties for enabling Obama. They have only themselves to blame.


15 posted on 05/19/2008 6:06:16 AM PDT by dforest (I had almost forgotten that McCain is the nominee. Too bad I was reminded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dukes Travels
So it's the author's contention that 300,000,000 Americans have basically conservative roots; therefore the country is moving rapidly to the left and will elect Obama to further accelerate the move.

And the country will move to the left with McCain also, only a little slower.

Therefore, conservatives should abandon their principles and vote for McCain because slow suicide is preferable.

What convoluted, incoherent "logic."

I feel like I need Dramamine after forcing myself to read this mess twice.

17 posted on 05/19/2008 6:09:02 AM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dukes Travels

I agree. Though the realities on the ground make it difficult, I will probably LITERALLY hold my nose when I stand in the booth and vote for McCain.

We can hope for a conservative running mate with him, though.

Look, if conservatives don’t hold McCain’s feet to the fire and require him to meet some of our demands, if we abandon him, there will be no one listening to us at all. McCain, whether he likes it or not, needs our votes to even have a chance, and he is going to be willing to cut deals.

We have to stick it to him.


21 posted on 05/19/2008 6:17:03 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dukes Travels

No, we won’t vote for Obama, but we can skip the Presidential ballot and go on to the other races.

Right now, I’m going to vote for McCain but, I’m real close to skipping the presidential ballot (or its equivalent - voting Losertarian or Green).


26 posted on 05/19/2008 6:21:04 AM PDT by Little Ray (I'm a Conservative. But I can vote for John McCain. If I have to. I guess.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dukes Travels

VOTE FOR Mr. THOMPSON!


29 posted on 05/19/2008 6:30:08 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dukes Travels
Keep a list of all these "Principled Conservative Thumbsuckers". If they get their wish and a Marxist or Socialist takes control, they will be the first to whine and moan.

By their actions, they have eliminated themselves from the political discourse. They have nothing to say, except "Good-Bye".

30 posted on 05/19/2008 6:31:37 AM PDT by Redleg Duke ("All gave some, and some gave all!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dukes Travels
Sometimes, things have to get worse before they get better.

In a political environment when things 'get worse' it can take generations before they get better and only then with a lot of suffering and bloodshed. Is that what we want for our nation and children? Vote the Communists OUT!

33 posted on 05/19/2008 6:35:11 AM PDT by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dukes Travels

See tagline.


36 posted on 05/19/2008 6:40:09 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (If McCain really CAN "win without conservatives," then why do you care if I vote for him or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dukes Travels
"May 19, 2008
There’s Too Much at Stake for Conservatives ...."

I seem to recall similar articles written on May 19, 2004, May 19, 2000, May 19, 1996, May 19, 1992 -- just about every election year. "Too Much at Stake!" "Hold Your Nose and Vote Republican!" And I believed them.

But, as Roberto Duran once said, "No más". I will go out and vote Republican (so the party can't blame the lack of turnout), but I will not vote for McCain.

44 posted on 05/19/2008 6:49:15 AM PDT by vincentfreeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dukes Travels

“The fact is that America is moving to the left. We haven’t reached European proportions yet, but our direction is clear, we’re accelerating and it’s time conservatives grasped it.”

I’ve predicted this right here on FreeRepublic numerous times over the past few years. Most recently:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2017269/posts?page=83#83

Shockley continues:
“Part of me is really interested to see what will happen if Obama becomes our next president. How much of his liberal agenda would he actually achieve, and how would the country react? I worry that things will get much worse, that we’ll lose much of our freedom, and the generally strong Christian presence in our country that I believe is among the primary reasons for our strength over the last few centuries will rapidly diminish.”

One watches crowds of 75,000 (as in Oregon on Sunday) with the trepidation that German Jews must have had, watching the Nazi rallies in Nurnberg in the 1930’s....

I’m not interested in seeing what’s going to happen, period - for exactly the reason in the previous paragraph.

- John


47 posted on 05/19/2008 6:52:18 AM PDT by Fishrrman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dukes Travels

I’ll wait to see who the bum picks as his running mate.


49 posted on 05/19/2008 6:54:26 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dukes Travels

Good article...thanks for posting! He’s been good for Az and we’ll be proud to have him as President.


81 posted on 05/19/2008 7:29:28 AM PDT by HappyinAZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dukes Travels

BB Shrugs


84 posted on 05/19/2008 7:31:21 AM PDT by Biblebelter (If the big blue states got to choose the Republican nominee, I say let them elect him in the fall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dukes Travels
NO, conservatives will just NOT VOTE! I even have neighbors who are dems & they say they are not voting for a president either.

Numerous people I have talked to say the THREE choices are horrible for our country, so not only will conservatives not vote, but there are dems that refuse to vote for Hussein Obama!!!

85 posted on 05/19/2008 7:31:49 AM PDT by blondee123 (Three (3) Democrats running for President in 2008!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson