Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Senator Barack Obama Truly Too Elite To Be Elected President?
Findlaw.com ^ | May 16, 2008 | John W. Dean

Posted on 05/16/2008 10:26:42 AM PDT by imd102

In an earlier column, I raised the matter of whether, and how, Senator Barack Obama's conspicuous intelligence may act as a barrier to his being elected president. [SNIP]

In recent years, Democrats have nominated presidential candidates who are far more intelligent that their Republican counterparts. Common sense might suggest that high intelligence is necessary to be president, and conclude that we should applaud such nominations. Election politics, unfortunately, usually punishes the more intelligent nominee.

Start with Nixon. Hubert Humphrey had a remarkable mind and while Nixon was no slouch, Humphrey always struck those who knew both men well as way ahead of Nixon in intellect....In 1976, Jimmy Carter (a nuclear physicist by training) made Gerald Ford seem something of a dunce (indeed, Lyndon Johnson had once said that Ford was incapable of chewing gum and thinking at the same time). Carter's Southern drawl, however, made his intelligence less than conspicuous, enabling him to win at least one term. But Ronald Reagan, whom no one will ever accuse of being an intellectual (his favored briefing material as president was Reader's Digest) trounced the elitist Carter in 1980, and then the far more mentally agile Walter Mondale in 1984.

Michael Dukakis, Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and John Kerry all were far brighter than their GOP opponents (George H.W. Bush, Bob Dole, and George W. Bush), but only Clinton made it to the White House. Clinton played down his intelligence and education (Georgetown, Oxford and Yale Law), and played up his bubba image....

Maybe Americans are ready to reconsidering wanting to elect the less intelligent candidate. And maybe Democrats can effectively deal with this bogus charge.

(Excerpt) Read more at writ.lp.findlaw.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: barackobama; bitter; bush; dean; democratparty; democrats; election; elections; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: imd102

I guess the more important point is that he was wrong about what he was writing. In particular, I believe that the elder president Bush was probably the most intelligent president we’ve had for many decades, and Reagan and Ford were very underrated. However, I think he has a point that voters don’t like candidates that come across as too intellectual.


21 posted on 05/16/2008 10:51:38 AM PDT by onguard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: imd102

Obama might not be “too elite” to get elected, but he is definitely too Marxist.


22 posted on 05/16/2008 10:52:55 AM PDT by Redbob (WWJBD - "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“Michael Dukakis, Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and John Kerry all were far brighter than their GOP opponents”

The Towering Intellect of Mike Dukakis??? Huh?
Al Gore who flunked out of divinty school and failed his science courses is just a major thinker!

Pa-LEASE!


23 posted on 05/16/2008 10:52:59 AM PDT by Holicheese (Hillary deserves the CMoH for her time in Tuzla!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: imd102

One thing I do know—he is SUCH A WHINER!!!!!

I called my two Dem Senators today—Biden and Carper—about Feinstein’s amnesty amendment to the Iraq supplemental bill.

Then I told their staffer to have these two, as superdelegates, to call Sen. Obama and tell him to stop being such a crybaby about the “appeasement remarks” by President Bush. I told them the President didn’t mention Obama by name, and everything the President said was factually and historically accurate.

I also gave the Biden staffer what for because of Senator Pottymouth’s swearing yesterday.

I then called Sen. McConnell’s office and asked why more GOP Senators aren’t joining in to defend the President on his remarks and to tell Obama to stop being such a crybaby.

The GOP once again risks losing an advantage by sitting around and letting the Dems run to the microphones and shape public opinion.


24 posted on 05/16/2008 10:53:34 AM PDT by exit82 (People get the government they deserve. And they are about to get it--in spades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: imd102
In recent years, Democrats have nominated presidential candidates who are far more intelligent that their Republican counterparts.

Now that's not an elitist thing to say, is it, Mr. Dean ?!

Last time I checked, Algore flunked out of Divinity school and GW Bush had an MBA from Harvard!
25 posted on 05/16/2008 10:53:45 AM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
 "Like George W. Bush, with his Harvard MBA, is "dumber" than Al Gore, who flunked out of Vanderbilt Divinity School??? "

Similarly, people claim Clinton is smart because he's a Rhodes scholar when the reality is that he is an Oxford dropout.  Anyone that gets a scholarship to any college and doesn't complete the program should be thought of as stupid, not smart.
26 posted on 05/16/2008 10:54:18 AM PDT by HawaiianGecko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: imd102
...John Kerry all were far brighter ...George W. Bush...

Must be awfully embarrasing, then, that George Bush got better grades than John Kerry at Yale.

27 posted on 05/16/2008 10:54:24 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Original thinking is on vacation when Barack Obama gives a speech. That’s why he needs to say “Just Words?” when quoting great speeches. The men who uttered them first did so at the risk of their lives. When Barack repeats them, they are in fact “Just Words”.


28 posted on 05/16/2008 10:55:16 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

“In 2007 he said that he would meet, in the first year of his presidency, with Iran, North Korea, Syria, and Venezuela. Three of those are listed as state sponsors of terror. They fund and support Hezbollah, Hamas, and others, and Iran is actively helping kill our own soldiers in Iraq.

So, by his own words, to meet with the without condition, he is an appeaser.”

This is a non-issue. Just because you meet with someone doesn’t make you an appeaser. You are an appeaser only if you make some concessions to them. Reagan met with the leaders of “the evil empire” and he was certainly no appeaser.


29 posted on 05/16/2008 10:55:24 AM PDT by onguard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: imd102

There are many reasons he is not qualified to be POTUS - lack of experience, Rev. Wright issue, etc.


30 posted on 05/16/2008 10:56:40 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Holicheese

Weren’t Bush’s GPA’s higher than Kerry’s?......


31 posted on 05/16/2008 10:56:44 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Holicheese
 "Michael Dukakis, Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and John Kerry all were far brighter than their GOP opponents

Keep in mind that they are so smart that only one Democrat since 1964 (44 years ago) has won the position of POTUS with a majority of the electorate.  And that was Jimmy who promptly thrown out on his butt after four years.

32 posted on 05/16/2008 10:57:40 AM PDT by HawaiianGecko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: imd102

Notice that all the examples are of leftist/dhimmirat geniuses and conservative dunces.

Of COURSE, you have to be dumb to be a conservative, duh!

What an arrogant ASSumption on the part of the author of this piece.


33 posted on 05/16/2008 10:58:05 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: imd102

John W. Dean, of the “Watergate” Dean’s?

I thought he was dead.


34 posted on 05/16/2008 10:58:36 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: imd102
My oh my, they just don't get it do they? The vast chasm between academic intelligence and wisdom is lost on these dolts (even if we concede the point that the left's candidates had better academic credentials than the right's). Likewise the difference between management skills and leadership. I know which I want in a President.
35 posted on 05/16/2008 10:58:45 AM PDT by Riflema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: imd102

Note that Obama will NOT release his transcripts. Easy to act too intelligent when being fed Duval Patrick’s lines.


36 posted on 05/16/2008 10:59:33 AM PDT by PghBaldy (Michelle O's handlers: "Get me white people...!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onguard

“I don’t think you can call John Dean of the Nixon White House a “liberal”, despite his being a bit of a hero to them for helping to bring down Nixon.”

John Dean is a real SOB


37 posted on 05/16/2008 11:01:04 AM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

That’s the problem with the leftist paradigm, the leftist worldview -

they believe that some are more “perfect” or elite than others,

and therefore have the knowledge, wisdom, and the OBLIGATION to make decisions in the lives of others. This is just an assumption on their part, due to their worldview.

This needs to be challenged. They think they know more about running businesses than any businessman running his own business. CHALLENGE IT.

DEMAND to know what they know about small business, and what gives them the right and the authority to tell those who DO know how to run businesses how to run them differently.

DEMAND to know how they can possibly know how any individual child needs to be taught, better than the parents that are raising them.

EXPOSE these arrogant asses for what they are.


38 posted on 05/16/2008 11:01:33 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: imd102
"Clinton played down his intelligence and education (Georgetown, Oxford and Yale Law)"

A quote from the Oxford Dean of Students during BillyJeff's tenure: "Fat, stoned and stupid is no way to go through life son."


39 posted on 05/16/2008 11:02:45 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

Bush also beat Kerry’s scores on the military assessment tests.


40 posted on 05/16/2008 11:03:00 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson