Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nice shot! Court kills NYC gun law - Phyllis Schlafly praises appellate panel for ruling against...
WorldNetDaily ^ | May 16, 2008 | Phyllis Schlafly

Posted on 05/16/2008 9:01:19 AM PDT by neverdem

The media have been telling us to watch the gun-control case now before the U.S. Supreme Court, where we await a decision about Americans' Second Amendment rights. But the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals just handed down an equally important gun decision that has additional implications against judicial supremacy.

The court, which convenes in New York City, shot down the longtime liberal dream of achieving gun control by suing gun manufacturers for crimes committed by firearms. In a remarkable decision, this federal appellate court dismissed City of New York v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp. and protected gun corporations against frivolous lawsuits in state and federal courts.

The lawsuit was brought by the City of New York in order to seek control over gun suppliers. At stake was not merely money but also whether liberals would obtain from judicial activists the gun control they could not get from legislatures.

This decision provides a road map for how Congress should withdraw jurisdiction from judicial supremacists in other fields, too. The decision is a sweeping affirmation of Congress' power to stop future and pending lawsuits in federal and state courts.

This ruling broke an alarming trend of judicial supremacy and stopped outrageous lawsuits that tried to impede the sale of guns because of illegal acts committed by New York City residents and others. Billionaire Mayor Michael Bloomberg was left empty-handed in his attempt to sue businesses concerning crimes committed by residents of his city.

The lawsuit cited the harm from gun sales while ignoring evidence that the benefits far outweigh the harm. The trial court sided with Bloomberg, but the appellate court said "no" and put an end to the nonsense.

Congress had legislated the basis for this decision by passing the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act in 2005. The PLCAA protects...

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; neyyork; ny; secondamendment

1 posted on 05/16/2008 9:01:20 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I want to watch him cry.


2 posted on 05/16/2008 9:05:41 AM PDT by wastedyears (Freedom is the right of all sentient beings. - Optimus Prime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Old news.. I guess Phyllis hasn’t kept up with the informatin age.


3 posted on 05/16/2008 9:05:54 AM PDT by Ron Jeremy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Ironically, Bloomberg may end up being one of the most important figures in the re-emergence of 2nd Amendment rights.


4 posted on 05/16/2008 9:05:57 AM PDT by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"In a remarkable decision, this federal appellate court dismissed City of New York v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp. and protected gun corporations against frivolous lawsuits in state and federal courts."

We are doomed when a court decision that is Constitutionally sound and intellectually consistent is hailed as, "remarkable." In a sane world, this court decision would have been described as the, the "expected ruling," or, "a foregone conclusion."

5 posted on 05/16/2008 9:08:28 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The trial court sided with Bloomberg, but the appellate court said "no" and put an end to the nonsense.

Put an end to this? How can anyone with even a thin threads worth of connection to reality say that? Bloomberg will appeal and this will continue until he wins and there is no appeal from those fighting for common sense, or until the Supreme Court says stop.

Then of course he will find some other nonsensical issue to harass us with.

6 posted on 05/16/2008 9:09:51 AM PDT by kAcknor ("A pistol! Are you expecting trouble sir?" "No ma'am, were I expecting trouble I'd have a rifle.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Bang! bang... take that Gloomberg:-()
7 posted on 05/16/2008 9:11:26 AM PDT by geo40xyz (McCain, Obama or Hillarybeast possibility of 4 Supreme Court Justices, Gore @UN. The WINNER is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

If you outlaw guns only liberals will sue gun manufacturers.


8 posted on 05/16/2008 9:11:42 AM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kAcknor

And Rush Limbaugh’s golf buddies think it would be great if Bloomingidiot ran for president.


9 posted on 05/16/2008 9:13:29 AM PDT by stevio (Crunchy Con - God, guns, guts, and organically grown crunchy nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

In a remarkable decision...

Where are we when common sense is considered remarkable?


10 posted on 05/16/2008 9:18:04 AM PDT by Joe Bfstplk (Pure drivel drives away ordinary drivel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The court, which convenes in New York City, shot down the longtime liberal dream of achieving gun control by suing gun manufacturers for crimes committed by firearms.

I didn't realize a firearm was capable of committing a crime. I though a human committed the crime with the firearm.

11 posted on 05/16/2008 9:27:05 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf9

Aw shucks! For a second, I was kinda hopin they repealed the Act of 68, and the Sullivan one. One can only dream. Because, in Rudy’s mind.....certain types of gun control are better in one part of the country, than they are another....../sarc.


12 posted on 05/16/2008 9:33:03 AM PDT by Seamus Mc Gillicuddy (Great minds discuss ideas, medium minds discuss events, small minds discuss people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“Misuse of courts to obtain a result contrary to the will of the American people should not be allowed on other vital issues. Congress should also take away from judges issues such as the Pledge of Allegiance, the Ten Commandments, the Boy Scouts and the definition of marriage”

Good “should” but not with a Senate and House under the continuing domination of RATS and RINOS!!


13 posted on 05/16/2008 9:45:02 AM PDT by Postman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron Jeremy
Old news.. I guess Phyllis hasn’t kept up with the informatin age.

While the decision came about two weeks ago, this may not be just a co-incidence.

"Misuse of courts to obtain a result contrary to the will of the American people should not be allowed on other vital issues. Congress should also take away from judges issues such as the Pledge of Allegiance, the Ten Commandments, the Boy Scouts and the definition of marriage."

Editorial: Judicial Alchemy, California Court Assaults Marriage

There was talk about amending California's Constitution. I wonder if the Federal Defense of Marriage Act has any bearing. I'm not a lawyer.

McCain is speaking at the NRA Convention today, even as he otherwise is trying to dump social conservatives.

14 posted on 05/16/2008 9:51:34 AM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Ironically, Bloomberg may end up being one of the most important figures in the re-emergence of 2nd Amendment rights.

Just as George Hanover III was one of the most important figures in its original emergence?

the infowarrior

15 posted on 05/16/2008 11:53:25 AM PDT by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: stevio
"And Rush Limbaugh’s golf buddies think it would be great if Bloomingidiot ran for president."

I do also. It will take votes away from Barrack Obama. I would also not mind seeing Obama tapp him as his VP nominee.
16 posted on 05/16/2008 12:39:14 PM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Postman

Bump to read later


17 posted on 05/16/2008 1:15:13 PM PDT by dcwusmc (We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

bump


18 posted on 05/16/2008 3:36:10 PM PDT by lowbridge ("I can't wait to see what he stands for." - Susan Sarandon on her support of Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson