Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/16/2008 9:01:20 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

I want to watch him cry.


2 posted on 05/16/2008 9:05:41 AM PDT by wastedyears (Freedom is the right of all sentient beings. - Optimus Prime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Old news.. I guess Phyllis hasn’t kept up with the informatin age.


3 posted on 05/16/2008 9:05:54 AM PDT by Ron Jeremy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Ironically, Bloomberg may end up being one of the most important figures in the re-emergence of 2nd Amendment rights.


4 posted on 05/16/2008 9:05:57 AM PDT by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
"In a remarkable decision, this federal appellate court dismissed City of New York v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp. and protected gun corporations against frivolous lawsuits in state and federal courts."

We are doomed when a court decision that is Constitutionally sound and intellectually consistent is hailed as, "remarkable." In a sane world, this court decision would have been described as the, the "expected ruling," or, "a foregone conclusion."

5 posted on 05/16/2008 9:08:28 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
The trial court sided with Bloomberg, but the appellate court said "no" and put an end to the nonsense.

Put an end to this? How can anyone with even a thin threads worth of connection to reality say that? Bloomberg will appeal and this will continue until he wins and there is no appeal from those fighting for common sense, or until the Supreme Court says stop.

Then of course he will find some other nonsensical issue to harass us with.

6 posted on 05/16/2008 9:09:51 AM PDT by kAcknor ("A pistol! Are you expecting trouble sir?" "No ma'am, were I expecting trouble I'd have a rifle.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Bang! bang... take that Gloomberg:-()
7 posted on 05/16/2008 9:11:26 AM PDT by geo40xyz (McCain, Obama or Hillarybeast possibility of 4 Supreme Court Justices, Gore @UN. The WINNER is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

If you outlaw guns only liberals will sue gun manufacturers.


8 posted on 05/16/2008 9:11:42 AM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
The court, which convenes in New York City, shot down the longtime liberal dream of achieving gun control by suing gun manufacturers for crimes committed by firearms.

I didn't realize a firearm was capable of committing a crime. I though a human committed the crime with the firearm.

11 posted on 05/16/2008 9:27:05 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

“Misuse of courts to obtain a result contrary to the will of the American people should not be allowed on other vital issues. Congress should also take away from judges issues such as the Pledge of Allegiance, the Ten Commandments, the Boy Scouts and the definition of marriage”

Good “should” but not with a Senate and House under the continuing domination of RATS and RINOS!!


13 posted on 05/16/2008 9:45:02 AM PDT by Postman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

bump


18 posted on 05/16/2008 3:36:10 PM PDT by lowbridge ("I can't wait to see what he stands for." - Susan Sarandon on her support of Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson