Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christopher Hitchens on John Edwards' endorsement of Barack Obama
The Mirror ^ | May 15, 2008 | Christopher Hitchens

Posted on 05/15/2008 7:32:33 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

The endorsement of Senator Barack Obama by former Senator John Edwards is a signal, though not an absolutely decisive one, of a shift in the commitment of the Democratic Party's unpledged centre.

It is partly a result of sheer momentum - Edwards said as much when he said that the voters had evidently made their choice "and so have I" - but partly also a feeling of alarm at the way in which Mrs Clinton has polarised the campaign, and gone so far as to polarise it along ethnic and racial lines.

Edwards himself ran a campaign very much along class lines, and is a white liberal from a southern state. He is known to have expressed private disdain for the way in which both Clintons have been campaigning, and is also known to have received regular telephone calls frrom Senator Obama soliciting his endorsement.

The fact that he withheld this so long, and then flew all the way to the hotly-disputed state of Michigan to be by Obama's side, suggests very strongly that it is only recent developments that swayed his decision, and the most recent devleopment is the emergence of Mrs Clinton as the self-declared candidate of the "white" vote.

Advertisement It's almost impossible to exaggerate the shock that this tactic has created in liberal Democratic ranks, echoing the alarm and repugnance that was felt for Richard Nixon's so-called "Southern strategy" a generation ago. It is particularly ironic, given the very heavy emphasis that both the Clintons have placed until recently on their close relationship with America's black community. The level of their support among black voters, in all recent polls, has been subjected to a precipitate drop that reflects considerable anger and resentment.

Senator Edwards cannot absolutely commit the delegates he would have brought to the convention in Denver but he was the party's joint standard-bearer in the last contest and he is symbolic of the way in which a section of the party is at least acknowledging what is beginning to look inevitable. However, when I described his own shift as "not absolutely decisive" I meant to draw attention to something that did NOT happen at the Michigan endorsement. Senator Edward's campaign and indeed career have been heavily dependent on the input and participation of his wife Elizabeth, who very often appeared on her own as the spokeswoman and is known to wield great influence with him as well as to occupy a very warm place in the heart of the Democratic party's rank-and-file. She did not fly to Michigan with Senator Edwards and, lest anyone attribute this to her recent battle with illness, also let it be known that she was not lending her name to the endorsement. So there are still some areas where the Obama charm has not yet fully penetrated.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Illinois; US: Michigan; US: New York; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: 2008endorsements; democrats; election; elections; endorsements; hillary; hitchens; johnedwards; johnwdwards; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Yeah, but Obama's anti-white racism is okee-dokey, right, Chris? The hypocrisy of the left is monumental!
1 posted on 05/15/2008 7:32:34 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Obama’s going to have to publically endorse gay marriage before Elizabeth will announce her presence with authority, for BO.


2 posted on 05/15/2008 7:37:12 PM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

He sure used a lot of words just to say that that the greedy bambulance chaser is after the Attorney General job in a Bama administration.


3 posted on 05/15/2008 7:38:20 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (De-Globalize yourself !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yeah, sure. Obama hasn’t played the race card at all. I also like how the rich cracker Edwards plays the class divide.

These 2 morons were made for each other.


4 posted on 05/15/2008 7:40:04 PM PDT by toddlintown (My kingdom for a beer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’m amazed how the MSM has greeted Edward’s support of Obama as the Second Coming. Look at the facts. Edwards is a shyster trial lawyer who couldn’t even carry North Carolina, his home state, in the ‘04 election. He didn’t run for reelection to the Senate because the polls indicated that he’d be overwhelmingly defeated. His run for president recently with his socialist “two America’s” nonsense reaffirmed his reputation as a serial loser. He’s endorsed Obama and is hanging around because he hopes to become Attorney General or get some other plumb.


5 posted on 05/15/2008 7:45:03 PM PDT by T.L.Sink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
a Bama administration

Bamas Breakfast in Little Italy: http://www.chicagogluttons.com/bamas-breakfast-in-little-italy


6 posted on 05/15/2008 7:49:55 PM PDT by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Sounds like Silky Pony wants to be Veep!


7 posted on 05/15/2008 7:50:33 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This low grade moron writer, “His wife is important in..”

She was hired by a Soros concern a month ago, as if the tea leafs were not already in place and saying what they were saying a month ago.


8 posted on 05/15/2008 7:58:58 PM PDT by padre35 (Conservative in Exile/ Isaiah 3.3/Cry havoc and let slip the RINOS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

You can be assured Obama was high bidder. He didn’t make his move without a promise.


9 posted on 05/15/2008 7:59:17 PM PDT by elpadre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink
or get some other plumb

Was that an intentional pun, a Freudian slip, or just a misspelling?

plumb (plm) n. 1. A weight on the end of a line, used to determine water depth. 2. A weight on the end of a line, used especially by masons and carpenters to establish a true vertical. adv. 1. In a vertical or perpendicular line. 2. Informal Directly; squarely: fell plumb in the middle of the puddle. 3. also plum Informal Utterly; completely: plumb worn out. See Note at right. adj. 1. Exactly vertical. See Synonyms at vertical. 2. also plum Informal Utter; absolute; sheer: a plumb fool. v. plumbed, plumb·ing, plumbs v.tr. 1. To determine the depth of with a plumb; sound. 2. To test the verticality or alignment of with a plumb. 3. To straighten or make perpendicular: plumb up the wall. 4. To examine closely or deeply; probe: "Shallow ideas are plumbed and discarded" Gilbert Highet. 5. To seal with lead. v.intr. To work as a plumber. Idiom: out of/off plumb Not vertical. [Middle English, lead, a plumb, from Old French plomb, from Latin plumbum, lead.]

I think the word plummet (to fall) may come from the same Latin root.

Or perhaps this is all related to your screen name "Sink".

10 posted on 05/15/2008 8:01:02 PM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

Or perhaps The Breck Girl can be First Lady.


11 posted on 05/15/2008 8:02:39 PM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The endorsement of Senator Barack Obama by former Senator John Edwards is a signal, though not an absolutely decisive one, of a shift in the commitment of the Democratic Party's unpledged centre.

yeah. by the time the breck girl jumps on the bandwagon, you can bet it's gotten most of its momentum already.

12 posted on 05/15/2008 8:06:34 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (the jihadis are the shock troops of communism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reg45
Or perhaps The Breck Girl can be First Lady.

She's no lady!

13 posted on 05/15/2008 8:07:20 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (It takes a father to raise a child.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; LS
The endorsement of Senator Barack Obama by former Senator John Edwards is a signal, though not an absolutely decisive one, of a shift in the commitment of the Democratic Party's unpledged centre.

Or maybe Edwards held off until a time of maximum damage.

Hillary's free press ride after West Virginia was derailed by Edwards. Who knows, Hillary's next big win might bring Gore to Obama's side.

Do powerful dems dislike Hillary as much as we do?

14 posted on 05/15/2008 8:22:05 PM PDT by GOPJ (The "thug-way" - Hill won't stop 'til she wins or Obama accepts her as VP .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Just in time for summer “reruns”. Bring back the hair video!


15 posted on 05/15/2008 8:43:16 PM PDT by Notasoccermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reg45

It’s just a common figure of speech, as in “political plumb.” I think people who are anxious to ascribe Freudian interpretations to commonly used conversational nouns have some other things to worry about.


16 posted on 05/15/2008 8:47:26 PM PDT by T.L.Sink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Alia

Elizabeth Edwards is the wife of John Edwards. Is she a superdelegate? What now... do the wives have to get up there now too when a superdelegate endorses someone? This is getting absolutely comical.


17 posted on 05/15/2008 9:03:41 PM PDT by cubreporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Glad to see that Hitchens mentioned Edwards’ use of “class warfare” in his VP campaign.

He is nothing but a liberal-chic Marxist-lite who doesn’t mind having had 4 homes worth over $12 million, clear-cut a hill to have a 29,000 sq ft monument to himself built on it, and took his client-victims to the cleaners, his.

What a piece of crap. Oh, I forgot, he is a leader of the Democrat Party. Sorry!


18 posted on 05/15/2008 9:10:47 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The Clintons have a right to be shocked. He was their “Black President”. He put his office in Harlem. The blacks fully supported the Clintons.

Oh, but then a black man ran for President. Sorry, Bill and Hillary — race trumps all.

Nobody should be expected to vote for someone of another race when there’s someone of their OWN race running.

Oh — I mean if it’s a BLACK person.

If whites said they were going to vote for the WHITE candidate, it would be evil and racist.

But given two liberal democrats, one of which has long enjoyed overwhelming black support, the black man gets 90+% of the black vote — that can ONLY be racism, there is no other plausible explanation.

And the white democrats will remember how the blacks turned on the white woman to vote for the black man.

It’s time for Rush to dig up the information about the WACO hearing where Conyers went after Reno, and Rush explained that it was only because he was a black man and she was a white woman.

There is a reason that, 30+ years after the civil rights movement, and in the era of enlightenment, there is only one black in the senate, even though half the senators are democrats, some from democrat states where there is virtually no republican opposition, which means the democrats could run anybody they want.

In Maryland, when they had a choice to elect a black man, or a white man, the democrats chose the white guy. Then they did it again in the general election when the republican candidate was black.


19 posted on 05/15/2008 9:45:49 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If I were cynical, I’d say that Silky Pony is after the Veep spot.

If I were really, reeeeeeally cynical, I’d say that Silky Pony agrees with Hillary “I’m White! Vote for Me!” Clinton that Obama is in fact unelectable, and therefore SP is supporting Obama merely so that he can lose, and SP will then have another shot at the whole thing in four years.

But that would be cynical to think that, wouldn’t it?


20 posted on 05/15/2008 10:03:42 PM PDT by Hetty_Fauxvert (Marxist Hillary and Socialist Obama will trash the USA for the next 30 years. Vote McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson