The Abandonator.
I like it.
So he spent his career killing terrorists, bad guys, aliens, terminators...but can’t find a way to cut spending.
Consider this a divorce.
well if he can’t cut the mustard;
he needs to resign...
Dear Arnold,
How does it feel to be a failure?
Just curious.
What a girly man.
So much for all the talk about “girly men” etc. and all his other windbag pronouncements when he was first elected. It took him a very short time to abandon the party that elected him and turn big time Rino. The sooner we lose this guy the better.
POTUS is his priority. He’ll take whatever political positions he thinks will lead to do the impossible.
Perhaps by that time the title will be “POTNAU”.
I’ve often wondered how quickly some states would collapse into a third world nation if they were cut off from the USA. I figure California would last about a month. Other States would probably do just fine, if not better.
Recall the Abandonator.
The “Terminator’s” steroid shrunken gonads are insufficient to the task of the common manger of even the smallest business.
When SPENDING exceeds INCOME -— FIRST CUT SPENDING
STOP providing welfare and services to ILLEGAL ALIENS.
OUTSOURCE state prisoners to a lower cost provider: Mexico?
Give our “Civil Servants” the choice of salary reduction or a 10%-20% reduction in staff.
Reduce ALL non-essential/emergency service department budgets by 20%.
However, in Kalifornicate -— our “politicians” are to dependent on the dependent to take the necessary action..
Taxpayers are enslaved by the “unCivil Servants”, welfare leaches and illegal aliens...
Combined they have succeeded in killing the Golden Goose that was California.
You want to see what a McCain Presidency will look like?
Well here it is in all it’s glory.
When you run from your principles in order to garner votes, this is what you get!
The governor has proposed a 10% across the board spending cut and has most recently increased it. Hospitals in the state stand to lose 500 million dollars. If you don't think that's a cut in services you're out of your mind.
"I'll not be bahhck."
has now abandoned his goal of fixing the problem ...
“You’ve been terminated, Terminator.”
"You wackjob hard-right social conservative nuts just don't GET it. Arnold is a FISCAL conservative and what California needs right now is a FISCAL conservative who will CUT UP THE CREDIT CARDS, BLOW UP THE BOXES, STOP OUT-OF-CONTROL SPENDING, and... BRING THE BUISNESSES BACK!!! Arnold is sooooo much better than Red Davis but you extremist single issue pro-life wingnuts can't see it!!! I'll be laughing my butt off when Arnold DELIEVERS California to BUSH & the GOP!!! Have fun backing McClintock WHO CANNOT WIN, the rest of us are going to JOIN ARNOLD and DO something about the mess California is in!!! FIVE YEARS FROM NOW, we're going to look back on this and laugh AT you hopeless wingnuts who never ever get aboard with a WINNER when you have the chance!!"
"You wackjob hard-right social conservative nuts just don't GET it. Arnold is a FISCAL conservative and what California needs right now is a FISCAL conservative who will CUT UP THE CREDIT CARDS, BLOW UP THE BOXES, STOP OUT-OF-CONTROL SPENDING, and... BRING THE BUISNESSES BACK!!! Arnold is sooooo much better than Red Davis but you extremist single issue pro-life wingnuts can't see it!!! I'll be laughing my butt off when Arnold DELIEVERS California to BUSH & the GOP!!! Have fun backing McClintock WHO CANNOT WIN, the rest of us are going to JOIN ARNOLD and DO something about the mess California is in!!! FIVE YEARS FROM NOW, we're going to look back on this and laugh AT you hopeless wingnuts who never ever get aboard with a WINNER when you have the chance!!"
$12 bill in services to illegals and no way to cut spending.
His trouble started early, when he proposed spending cuts that were politically unpalatable...
That's kind of stupid. ALL government spending cuts are unpalatable to the scumbag politicians.
How are they supposed to buy votes? With their own money?
The public's desire for spending on schools, health care, prisons, welfare, roads and other services is not matched by the voters' willingness to raise taxes.
Two different subsets. What Weintraub should have clarified is that the losers, bums, and parasites (the Democrat "base") want more and more "spending" while the working, taxpaying, traditional American families (the Republican "base") are not willing to continue being gang-raped for the money to pay for those spending sprees.