Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain Urges Free-Market Principles to Reduce Global Warming
My Way News ^ | 5-12-08 | Glen Johnson

Posted on 05/12/2008 5:26:19 AM PDT by webschooner

PHOENIX (AP) - Republican John McCain, reaching out to both independents and green-minded social conservatives, argues that global warming is undeniable and the country must take steps to bring it under control while adhering to free-market principles.

In remarks prepared for delivery Monday at a Portland, Ore., wind turbine manufacturer, the presidential contender says expanded nuclear power must be considered to reduce carbon-fuel emissions. He also sets a goal that by 2050, the country will reduce carbon emissions to a level 60 percent below that emitted in 1990.

"For all of the last century, the profit motive basically led in one direction - toward machines, methods and industries that used oil and gas," said McCain. "Enormous good came from that industrial growth, and we are all the beneficiaries of the national prosperity it built. But there were costs we weren't counting, and often hardly noticed. And these terrible costs have added up now, in the atmosphere, in the oceans and all across the natural world."

The Arizona senator promised to challenge China and India, two economic rivals who are fueling their challenge to U.S. market supremacy with heavily polluting fuels such as coal, gas and oil.

"For all of its historical disregard of environmental standards, it cannot have escaped the attention of the Chinese regime that China's skies are dangerously polluted, its beautiful rivers are dying, its grasslands vanishing, its coastlines receding and its own glaciers melting," said McCain.

He also took a swipe at President Bush, who balked at the beginning of its term at signing the Kyoto global warming protocols. McCain said he would return to the negotiating table.

"I will not shirk the mantle of leadership that the United States bears. I will not permit eight long years to pass without serious action on serious challenges. I will not accept the same dead-end of failed diplomacy that claimed Kyoto. The United States will lead and will lead with a different approach - an approach that speaks to the interests and obligations of every nation," he said.

The language highlighted the political stakes for McCain, his party's presumed nominee. His visit to Oregon came just days after the two leading Democratic contenders, Sens. Barack Obama of Illinois and Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York, campaigned in the state.

Oregon is among the expected general election battlegrounds, and its Columbia and Hood rivers are playgrounds for many outdoorsmen and environmentalists.

Global warming also stands with abortion rights and an array of social causes as important issues to the evangelicals and Christian conservatives whom McCain hopes will bolster his political base this fall.

McCain has long expressed a belief in global warming, arguing that even if he is wrong, acting as if the planet's temperature were increasing would only benefit the environment if scientists subsequently proved he was mistaken.

McCain traveled to the Pacific Northwest from Arizona, where he and his family spent Mother's Day.

In his speech, he highlighted his personal experiences viewing evidence of glacial recession. He also cited evidence of a shift in animal migration patterns.

"You would think that if the polar bears, walruses, and sea birds have the good sense to respond to new conditions and new dangers, then humanity can respond as well," he said.

McCain's major solution is to implement a cap-and-trade program on carbon-fuel emissions, like a similar program in the Clean Air Act that was used to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions that triggered acid rain.

Industries would be given emission targets, and those coming in under their limit could sell their surplus polluting capacity to companies unable to meet their target.

McCain wants the country to return to 2005 emission levels by 2012; 1990 levels by 2020; and to a level sixty percent below that by 2050.

"As never before, the market would reward any person or company that seeks to invent, improve, or acquire alternatives to carbon-based energy," he said. "More likely, however, there will be some companies that need extra emissions rights, and they will be able to buy them. The system to meet these targets and timetables will give these companies extra time to adapt - and that is good economic policy."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; agw; climatechange; globalwarming; greens; issues; mccain; mccaingwarming
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-198 next last
To: rom

Einstein was Swiss. Hillary!08 has the highest IQ of all of them. Average IQ here is the same as O’Bama’s.


141 posted on 05/12/2008 8:17:35 AM PDT by RightWhale (It's still unclear what impact global warming will have on vertical wind shear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
But he advocates closing GITMO and moving the terrorists to US prisons.

Nowhere have I seen McCain advocate "moving the terrorists to US prisons." Can you likewise explain why Admiral Mullen, Bush's chosen JCS chairman, advocates closing GITMO and in fact the administration is moving toward that end even now?

Add his advocacy of legalizing millions of illegals and his assaults on the First Amendment.

Funny, Bush has also taken those positions. I guess those negate Bush's efforts in the WOT as well.
142 posted on 05/12/2008 8:19:28 AM PDT by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Carl from Marietta

I have seen a survey showing 70% of Americans believing in some form of climate change. True or false, that’s a large group and encompasses far more than even a burgeoning Democratic Party.


143 posted on 05/12/2008 8:20:56 AM PDT by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

LOL. True about Einstein. But the point remains!

Idiocy doesn’t preclude you from being a nominee, nor President.


144 posted on 05/12/2008 8:23:37 AM PDT by rom (Real Conservatives don't vote for Socialists with an (R) next to their name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl
"How I am ever going to bring myself to pull the lever for this guy."

Why would you want to?

145 posted on 05/12/2008 8:24:48 AM PDT by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Look who’s been president for the last 7 years and look how popular he is. Do the math.

Actually if the party were stupid they would nominate someone more like Bush.


146 posted on 05/12/2008 8:26:21 AM PDT by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: webschooner
(warning: bad language)(warning: bad language)(warning: bad language)
(warning: bad language)O'REILLY LIKE IT!!!(warning: bad language)
(warning: bad language)(warning: bad language)(warning: bad language)
147 posted on 05/12/2008 8:30:07 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates
Thanks for the link. I have fully evaluated McCain in a very methodical, common sense manner -- paying very close attention to what he has actually said and done in his political career. That is the very best way to judge what he might do in the future.

McCain is fond of mentioning how the federal government has failed in this and lacked in that ... you know, the federal government of which he has been a directing member for all these years?

McCain is part of the problem, not the solution.

148 posted on 05/12/2008 8:30:17 AM PDT by JustaDumbBlonde ("When the government fears the people there is liberty ... " Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar
Those who are counting on McCain to make better choices for judges are dreaming.

You may well say that because we cannot run two parallel histories. But you are wrong.
149 posted on 05/12/2008 8:31:29 AM PDT by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: JustaDumbBlonde
you know, the federal government of which he has been a directing member for all these years

McCain is one of 535 members of Congress. Actually the President (Bush) has been the directing member of the federal government for all these years (2001-now).
150 posted on 05/12/2008 8:33:59 AM PDT by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: JustaDumbBlonde
paying very close attention to what he has actually said and done in his political career.

83% lifetime conservative rating. 80% last year. 94% last year, Club for Growth. 0% lifetime from NARAL, Planned Parenthood, and NOW. Very low ratings from ACLU, Sierra Club, and other wackies. Opposed Bush's trillion dollar prescription giveaway, Federal subsidies for ethanol, Federalized insurance, and pork of all variety. How about that for a record? (Somehow I'm sure you'll find a way to dismiss that.)
151 posted on 05/12/2008 8:40:31 AM PDT by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: EnigmaticAnomaly
"I fear what the dims do to our nation will be irreversible..."

Difficult perhaps, but not impossible.

As it is - we are slowly drifting in the same direction...
We are currently the frog in tepid water, but the heat is increasing slowly enough we haven't "jumped" -- but the result will be the same..

If it comes QUICKLY, perhaps the shock will force an overly civilized society to resort to the means our founders provided to "resist" a tyranical government.....

Unfortunately -- some demons are not mollified, frightened or driven away by rational conversation , negotiation or educaton....
The worst demons must be destroyed. Literally.

152 posted on 05/12/2008 8:40:57 AM PDT by river rat (Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: kabar
"What party nominates its maverick as its standard bearer? The Stupid Party."

I could stomach being a Republican when I thought they were THE STUPID PARTY; I became an Independent conservative when I realized how EVIL they are. Some of the Democrats may be true believers, others are moron kool-aid drinkers, but most of the Republicans, like McCain, are just greedy evil sob's willing to sell us out for their own profit.

153 posted on 05/12/2008 8:41:26 AM PDT by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Where is it written that the GOP is supposed to last forever?

I believe we may be in a time of momentous change which will see the birth ... difficult and messy ... of a new political party or even two! Of course, the Democrats are in far better shape to weather this change than the Republicans.

It's obvious the Two-Party System is not serving most of us on this site very well. McCain is a Centrist, but I cannot answer whether he is to the left or the right of that mythical mark. Both Democrats are far to the Left, but Mrs. Clinton is successfully flying a false flag and staking claim to the patriotic survivors of the Democrat Party,i.e., working people of the traditional democrat party.

Center Left, Center Right, Far Left, Far Right would fit more Americans than the lash-up we have now.

154 posted on 05/12/2008 8:44:21 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk (GOP Plank: Pump MORE US Crude--2Xrefining capacity -- Coal /METHANOL fuel-- Build Nukes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

McCain would do well to start referring it to “Global Climate Change” now. Global Warming Theory is going to soon collapse and make fools of Al Gore and the politically motivated “scientists”. Global Climate change is accurate and implies that indeed man does have an impact on a dynamic ever changing system. Our impact doesn’t always have to equate a negative.


155 posted on 05/12/2008 8:45:27 AM PDT by RC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: river rat
"If it comes QUICKLY, perhaps the shock will force an overly civilized society to resort to the means our founders provided to "resist" a tyrannical government....."

Although I pray it never comes to this, I would not cower in fear if called upon to once again take up arms in defense of this land our forefathers bequeathed unto us...

156 posted on 05/12/2008 8:48:31 AM PDT by EnigmaticAnomaly (Proud member of the largest 'Hate Group' in the USA...The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: webschooner

“He also cited evidence of a shift in animal migration patterns.”

Say there, John, did you happen to notice the big shift in HUMAN migration?????


157 posted on 05/12/2008 8:49:26 AM PDT by AuntB (Vote Obama! ..........Because ya can't blame 'the man' when you are the 'man'.... Wanda Sikes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webschooner

Rush is going to kick his a$$ today over this idiocy.


158 posted on 05/12/2008 8:50:16 AM PDT by Mogollon (Vote straight GOP for congress....our only protection against Obama-Clinton, or McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates
Nowhere have I seen McCain advocate "moving the terrorists to US prisons."

Unless you are splitting hairs [a.k.a., parsing, nuancing], if GITMO is closed, those prisoners will have to be sent somewhere.

From USA Today, Guantanamo Bay puzzles candidates
McCain wants to close Guantanamo, he says, because its existence is damaging U.S. credibility abroad. He also wants to speed up trials. "He would want to speed up the tribunal process for prisoners, because he doesn't support indefinite detentions," McCain spokesman Danny Diaz says.
If they are tried and the verdict is imprisonment, where do you think they will be imprisoned, if GITMO is closed?

==

I guess those negate Bush's efforts in the WOT as well.

It is difficult to claim fighting in Iraq is for our National Security, when our borders are wide open. Even Congress has been shown evidence that illegal Islamics have been coming across the borders. So, yes, Bush is undermining his own WOT efforts.
159 posted on 05/12/2008 8:51:58 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
Dear Senator, Many prominent scientists and climatologists are now questioning whether global warming is real or an aberration in how the data was collected and interpreted. The link between CO2 in the atmosphere and increasing global temperatures is not proven and if it has any role at all it is in combination with many other factors which are simply beyond human control. To irreparably damage the US economy pursuing the phantom of man made global warming is unconscionable

To damn bad the Republicans are incapable of delivering that message in an effective, forceful manner. Imagine what might happen if the present WH recumbent had the will ... and the ability to explain this to the American people.

Instead, both he and Mccain merely spread the stupidity that has already severely weakened our economy.

160 posted on 05/12/2008 8:52:53 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk (GOP Plank: Pump MORE US Crude--2Xrefining capacity -- Coal /METHANOL fuel-- Build Nukes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-198 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson