Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama: "I Will Raise Taxes"
townhall.com ^ | May 8, 2008 | Amanda Carpenter

Posted on 05/08/2008 6:06:06 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

By Amanda Carpenter

Thursday, May 8, 2008

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama flatly promised to raise taxes in a television interview Thursday afternoon.

“I will raise CEO taxes,” Obama told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer on “The Situation Room.”

“If you’re a CEO in this country you’ll probably pay more taxes,” Obama said. Obama speculated his CEO tax rates “won’t be prohibitively high, you’ll pay roughly what you did in the 90’s when they were doing fine.”

Obama also said he would eliminate the Bush tax cuts and install what he called a “middle class tax cut.”

Blitzer asked Obama to define “middle class.”

Obama replied, “You know, I think the definitions are always a little bit rough” and said “if you’re making $100,000 a year or less, then you’re pretty solidly middle class…On the other hand, if you’re making more than $100,000 and certainly if you’re making more than $200,000 or $250,000, you’re doing pretty well.”

The CNN interview was the first one Obama has held since Tuesday’s primaries in Indiana and North Carolina. In it, the Illinois senator also discussed his judicial philosophy. Obama, who has delivered constitutional lectures at University of Chicago Law School, said he thought Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was “a very sensible judge.” He also hinted he would place special emphasis on civil rights protections when appointing Supreme Court judges if elected President.

“We’ve got to make sure civil liberties are protected,” Obama said. “Because oftentimes there are pressures placed on politicians to want to set civil liberties aside, especially at a time when we’ve had terrorist attacks. Making sure we maintain our separation of powers so that we don’t have a president who is takes over more and more power, I think those are all criteria by which I’d judge whether or not this is a good appointee.”


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 101000peryearisrich; 2008; barackobama; blueturban; democratparty; democrats; elections; fritzmondalepartdeux; lendmeyourears; marxism; mondale; nextpresident; obama; obamatruthfile; obambi; punishacheivement; rewardindolence; taxincrease; whatamaroon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 241-251 next last
To: headstamp 2
“Obama replied, “You know, I think the definitions are always a little bit rough” and said “if you’re making $100,000 a year or less, then you’re pretty solidly middle class…On the other hand, if you’re making more than $100,000 and certainly if you’re making more than $200,000 or $250,000, you’re doing pretty well.”

Brilliant. Raise taxes on small business owners and entrepreneurs.

Marxist idiot.


Agreed. I guess he's just following his church's guidelines to “Disavow the Pursuit of Middleclassness”.
161 posted on 05/09/2008 4:56:43 AM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: rfp1234

Thank you for posting. - bill


162 posted on 05/09/2008 4:56:49 AM PDT by bill1952 (I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

>>What is a CEO in Obamas mind?

Let me help: a CEO is a person in charge. Therefore, EVERY person in Congress is in charge plus they all make more than $100K. Let’s start with a 100% tax on them first.


163 posted on 05/09/2008 5:26:50 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1 - Take no prisoners))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
Ruth Ginsburg, late of the ACLU, is one that received his YES vote in the Senate to confirm.

Look, I dislike McCain as much as the next guy - but this is bogus.

The Ginsburg vote was taken back when the President's choice was almost always approved, as long as the applicant was qualified on paper. This was before the Dems started their eternal scorched-earth Judiciary hearings in the Senate. It seems like an eternity ago, I know.

You may hate Buzzy Ginsburg, but this is the way it is supposed to work. Bill Clinton won the election. She was qualified. He picked her. The way to not have her, was to win the Presidential election. McCain's vote to confirm her is the way it is supposed to work - the bloodbath should take place in the Presidential election, not in the Judiciary hearings.

You want to blame someone, blame me - I voted for Perot, and helped make the fiasco of the Clinton years possible.
164 posted on 05/09/2008 5:34:39 AM PDT by horse_doc (Visualize a world where a tactical nuke went off at Max Yasgur's farm in 1969.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: horse_doc
You want to blame someone, blame me - I voted for Perot, and helped make the fiasco of the Clinton years possible.

Are you repenting and promising never to do it again?

165 posted on 05/09/2008 5:38:32 AM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
This is the $100,000 question that no one, and I mean no one, in the MSM would have the nads to ask because he's screwed no matter how he answers.
166 posted on 05/09/2008 5:39:00 AM PDT by RU88 (The false messiah can not change water into wine any more than he can get unity from diversity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: horse_doc

The Pubbies were playing nice according to the traditional thought that the president gets to pick the judiciary that he wants, and the senate approves only on qualifications, not on ideology, because that’s what the presidential election was about.

The left, though, doesn’t play by “rules” or “traditions” when those rules don’t give them the results that they want. And they know that the only way they’ve gotten their ideology set into law is through the judiciary, so they were willing to do anything to keep control of that branch, even though they lost the presidential election twice.


167 posted on 05/09/2008 5:40:11 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

There’s a bell curve of incomes (and incomes don’t necessarily correlate with wealth, but that’s WAY over bambi’s head), and there’s a point on the leftward slope and one on the rightward slope, between which could be called the “middle”.

This middle changes as the curve moves, and the curve moves generally rightward, where everyone is making more money.

If you keep the guide lines in the same place, it looks like the gap between the rich and poor is getting bigger, when it really hasn’t changed, the income curve just moved.

Bambi isn’t interested in gov’t revenue, he’s interested in using the tax system for “fairness” - ie, punishing those that succeed.

Yes, he’s a Marxist.


168 posted on 05/09/2008 5:44:38 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Williams
If McCain is elected you will get Roberts.

You have great faith. (Faith being belief in the absence of evidence - or contradicting the evidence, in this case)

169 posted on 05/09/2008 5:45:29 AM PDT by MortMan (Those who stand for nothing fall for anything. - Alexander Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: horse_doc
>Look, I dislike McCain as much as the next guy - but this is bogus.

No doc, it is called doing your due diligence and research and then looking at the actions of the man while in office. - take a pill.

> McCain's vote to confirm her is the way it is supposed to work

LOL! Then why have the fake vote at all?!?

Look, the way that McCain would have garnered my respect on this issue would have been for him to stand up in the Senate and say

“I will not vote for this lady to be seated on the bench, and these are my reasons!”

Like Jesse Helms did

Your concept is outright ... never mind. no disrespect intended

170 posted on 05/09/2008 5:46:24 AM PDT by bill1952 (I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: TLI

Obama: “I Will Raise Taxes.”

TLI: You are toast.......

The former governor of Texas Ann Richards ran against George W. Bush on that platform of starting an income tax in Texas.

It doesn’t really work well. Although his platform is more a class warfare tax, it really makes everyone other than liberals uneasy.


171 posted on 05/09/2008 5:51:36 AM PDT by Hang'emAll (WE WILL NOT DISARM!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

My son makes $100k. The average house in Nassau County is $500k plus with taxes of $7k/yr. Obama wants even more of his money?


172 posted on 05/09/2008 5:53:43 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Yes, Obama will make sure there are less Americans “doing well”, these are the people who create jobs and hire people who become middle class.

With less people “doing well”, there will also be less jobs and less middle class, and more underclass dependent on Obama.

It’s communism.

Obama is the great threat to this nation in its existence.


173 posted on 05/09/2008 6:02:20 AM PDT by LowTaxesEqualProsperity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
if you’re making $100,000 a year or less, then you’re pretty solidly middle class

This ass hat has no clue what is happening. The only hedge many of us so called "solidly" middle class folks have against high prices is our real estate investment. Obama says he wants to raise the long term capital gains tax to 28% almost doubling the existing tax. Meaning he is doubling the tax on the middle class if we try to outright sell our real estate investment. This goes for all other investments subject to long term capital gains tax, as well.

174 posted on 05/09/2008 6:08:30 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
So much for the American dream. Dems are disgusting, and McCain is only a step behind them.

The only bright spot in this worst election year I have ever seen....after 2 years of dems controlling the Hose, Senate and the Presidency there will be a landslide for the Republicans.

175 posted on 05/09/2008 6:25:35 AM PDT by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1035rep

In his own words, behold American human waste, Osama Bin Obama.


176 posted on 05/09/2008 6:55:43 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: MartinStyles
I do not like McCain. I know people who flew with him. My Godfather was in his squadron and died on the Forrestall, he was sitting in his jet getting ready to be launched. I will vote for him though because Obama would be so much worse. My children would suffer because of Obama and I will not have that.
177 posted on 05/09/2008 7:31:35 AM PDT by coon2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

“you’ll pay roughly what you did in the 90’s when they were doing fine.”

We entered 2000 with a recession. We weren’t doing that well in the 1990s throughout the decade.

There was an internet stock bubble that did make some people money. Until they realized tulips like Pets.com and sock puppets weren’t worth anything.


178 posted on 05/09/2008 7:32:53 AM PDT by weegee ("I didn't kill innocent people." - Bill Ayers, Weatherman. Terrorist. Obama's comrade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IamConservative

Executive order.


179 posted on 05/09/2008 7:34:00 AM PDT by weegee ("I didn't kill innocent people." - Bill Ayers, Weatherman. Terrorist. Obama's comrade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Obama: "I Will Raise Taxes"

Lambchops, you ain't going to be President. Sit down and STFU!

180 posted on 05/09/2008 7:45:20 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 241-251 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson