Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Smart Gun' Still Hasn't Hit Mark
Newhouse News ^ | 4/27/2008 | Rick Hepp

Posted on 04/28/2008 3:36:07 PM PDT by Incorrigible

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
 

The gun grabbers don't really care if the gun is smart or not.  They want to confiscate them all!

 

1 posted on 04/28/2008 3:36:07 PM PDT by Incorrigible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible

Questions to ask:
1) Does it involve technology/mathmatics/science?
2) Do liberals approve of it?

If yes to both, run like hell. Liberals and technology do not mix. Think about it...English or eduction degrees and global warming. Political science degrees and economics. QED.


2 posted on 04/28/2008 3:41:20 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible

Questions to ask:
1) Does it involve technology/mathmatics/science?
2) Do liberals approve of it?

If yes to both, run like hell. Liberals and technology do not mix. Think about it...English or eduction degrees and global warming. Political science degrees and economics. QED.


3 posted on 04/28/2008 3:41:25 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible

So if they get them to work reliably, I guess the government will have to confiscate all those millions of “dumb” guns that pose such a grievous threat to the public safety.


4 posted on 04/28/2008 3:42:00 PM PDT by infantrywhooah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
"We know that gun manufactures have already developed these technologies, they just don't want to put them in guns," he said. "The National Rifle Association doesn't want them to do it."

If they're saying gun makers don't want to try to sell something their customers don't want, that's probably correct, but that's as it should be. It's their job as a seller to sell what I, the buyer, want, not my job to alter my expectations to what they've been ordered to push on me by some third party who hates their product anyway (See Microsoft, Vista, RIAA; also Staples, recycled paper).

If, OTOH, they're saying rational companies spend megabucks developing ultimately successful technologies that their market wants so they can refuse to sell them, they need to attend a rememdial econ course.

5 posted on 04/28/2008 3:44:55 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Typical white person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
Gun banners don't want to make guns more effective. They want to ban them.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

6 posted on 04/28/2008 3:53:06 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible

Agree 100% !!

Note all these idiots pushing this crap fire and work in clean controlled environment of a range......:o)

And they want their troopers to pack that crap ?

What a joke these bean counting bureaucrats are...... I will say this . One of travel guns where I may cross into a state or city etc where a blue gun with 3 rounds is illegal I pack a SW 696 44 Special that has the magnatrigger modification. My effort too never exceed the BS grabbers local ordinances.........


7 posted on 04/28/2008 3:56:56 PM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infantrywhooah
I guess the government will have to confiscate all those millions of “dumb” guns that pose such a grievous threat to the public safety.

Over my, and several gun grabbers, dead bodies.

I'll never carry a weapon I can't repair myself nor one that could potentially carry a pacification circuit that would allow the state to turn my weapon off at will.
8 posted on 04/28/2008 3:57:09 PM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg ("Shut the hell up, New York Times, you sanctimonious whining jerks!" - Craig Ferguson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
He said it would take "about two years of steady effort with proper funding'' to develop a working smart gun prototype.

And guess who pays.

9 posted on 04/28/2008 4:01:25 PM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible

***If it does — bang! — the gun fires. If not — click — nothing happens.***

The most frightning sound in the world when your life is on the line.


10 posted on 04/28/2008 4:04:32 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote
The credit card machines look at how shoppers sign their name — how hard they press the pen and the tempo of their signature — and not actual signatures. The "smart gun'' uses sensors to measure how a person pulls the trigger.

The gun has one-tenth of a second to decide. In that blink of an eye, the circuitry must receive millions of pieces of data from 16 pressure sensors in the weapon's grip, compare them to stored images of how authorized users of the weapon squeeze the trigger and decide if the two match.

What's the worst that can happen if a credit card machine rejects a legitimate signature? OK, now what's the worst thing that can happen when you pull your smartgun in a defensive situation? This is why 99% reliability isn't good enough.

11 posted on 04/28/2008 4:19:30 PM PDT by Tallguy (Tagline is offline till something better comes along...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible; All
Abort?
Retry?
Fail?

Gives new meaning to "the blue screen of death," doesn't it?

12 posted on 04/28/2008 4:25:43 PM PDT by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

“OK, now what’s the worst thing that can happen when you pull your smartgun in a defensive situation?”

And it’s not like in the pressure of a defensive situation, you might ‘pull’ faster, more spastically or anything, right?


13 posted on 04/28/2008 4:32:37 PM PDT by Let's Roll (As usual, following a shooting spree, libs want to take guns away from those who DIDN'T do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
If it does — bang! — the gun fires. If not — click — nothing happens.

This is wrong. There will be no "Click" of a firing pin banging into an empty pipe, it'll just be time to either grab your "real gun" back up, or kiss your ass goodbye.

14 posted on 04/28/2008 4:38:28 PM PDT by Doomonyou (Let them eat lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Let's Roll
And it’s not like in the pressure of a defensive situation, you might ‘pull’ faster, more spastically or anything, right?

Or have sweat, blood, dirt, grease, etc. on your hands.

15 posted on 04/28/2008 4:42:18 PM PDT by Doomonyou (Let them eat lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: infantrywhooah
ISo if they get them to work reliably, I guess the government will have to confiscate all those millions of “dumb” guns that pose such a grievous threat to the public safety.

It will be a gun buy-back, turn them in, wait 30 days and we'll get our replacements in the mail. Of course they won't work, but that's the idea.

16 posted on 04/28/2008 4:45:42 PM PDT by Doomonyou (Let them eat lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
I have a programable glove machine that can retreive the data out of the smart gun, enter it into my computer driven glove machine, and I can make a glove that when worn, will make the gun fire.

And not only that, Folks will pay 10 thousand dollars for one of these programable guns, instead of 1000 dollars for a colt python in 357 magnum. ( sarc.) I figure my glove machine will make big bucks.

Great stuff.

17 posted on 04/28/2008 4:49:27 PM PDT by Candor7 (Fascism? All it takes is for good men to say nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
And they want their troopers to pack that crap ?

LEO's will be exempt, along with federal employees and military. As usual.

18 posted on 04/28/2008 4:51:06 PM PDT by dbwz (kthxbai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dbwz

Well that sucks pond water now doesn’t it ........:o(

Stay safe !


19 posted on 04/28/2008 4:53:16 PM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Doomonyou

Or due to an injury that you just sustained in the course of the emergency!!!


20 posted on 04/28/2008 6:20:53 PM PDT by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson