Skip to comments.
Six reasons to vote for John McCain
Posted on 04/25/2008 5:53:24 PM PDT by EveningStar
John Paul Stevens, age 88
Antonin Scalia, age 72
Anthony Kennedy, age 71
David Souter, age 68
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, age 75
Stephen Breyer, age 69
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2008; mccain; pow; rino; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-276 next last
Yes. I know it's been said before.
To: EveningStar
John McCain, age 70, or is it 71?
2
posted on
04/25/2008 5:56:06 PM PDT
by
beandog
(Quit serving me mud and telling me it's chocolate pie.)
To: EveningStar
Know what? I totally believe McCain would stand up and start saying how he wanted to set a “new tone” in judicial nominations and that he is now appointing Teddy Kennedy and Nancy Pelosi to some new bipartisan commission to come up with a list of acceptable nominees! He signed on to the Gang of 14, he would definitely do something like this!
3
posted on
04/25/2008 5:58:17 PM PDT
by
Obadiah
(I dream of the day when chickens can cross the road without having their motives questioned!)
Six reasons not to vote for a RINO puke.
4
posted on
04/25/2008 5:58:18 PM PDT
by
CounterCounterCulture
(How many of your civil rights & liberties are you willing to sacrifice per election just to vote (R))
To: EveningStar
There's the possibility of all six being replaced by a Dem President.
5
posted on
04/25/2008 5:58:19 PM PDT
by
Ciexyz
To: EveningStar
I feel McCain is unbalanced. I cannot be expected to vote for an unbalanced person. McCain is not a conservative. I cannot be expected to vote for a non-conservative. And so I sha’n’t
6
posted on
04/25/2008 5:59:25 PM PDT
by
gorush
(Exterminate the Moops!)
To: EveningStar
As much as I would like to believe that John McCain would nominate conservative justices to the Supreme Court I find that the man cannot be trusted. I think he's as liberal,if not more liberal than the two democrat candidates.
All one has to do is open his eyes and observe what McCain has done with this North Carolina Republican committee Add.
McCain Is gutless and I cannot support him any more then I can Support Hillary or Obama.
So much for the next for years of hope.
7
posted on
04/25/2008 5:59:55 PM PDT
by
puppypusher
(The world is going to the dogs.)
To: EveningStar
This idiot counts Ted Kennedy among his friends. I don’t trust him to make SCOTUS appointments, either.
8
posted on
04/25/2008 6:00:02 PM PDT
by
buccaneer81
(Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
To: EveningStar
To: EveningStar
One who betrays will betray again. What makes you think he will be true to his word at all?
He is without honor.
He is not worthy of a vote.
Ever.
10
posted on
04/25/2008 6:00:43 PM PDT
by
roamer_1
(Globalism is just Socialism in a business suit.)
To: All
ONE REASON: If you are a homo or a lefty (same as 'progressive Republican,') MaCaca will move the Republican party to the left... Now, if you like that...then... well, you know... :)
11
posted on
04/25/2008 6:01:00 PM PDT
by
ElPatriota
(Duncan Hunter 08 -- I am proud to support this man for my president and may be Huck?.. Naah :))
To: CounterCounterCulture
Six reasons not to vote for a RINO puke. Yes, let Hillary or Obama win so they can replace any of them. They'll do so much better.
12
posted on
04/25/2008 6:01:07 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: beandog
13
posted on
04/25/2008 6:01:16 PM PDT
by
Just A Nobody
(PISSANT for President '08 - NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA)
Over 12 million reasons not to vote for a RINO globalist open-border puke...
14
posted on
04/25/2008 6:01:27 PM PDT
by
CounterCounterCulture
(How many of your civil rights & liberties are you willing to sacrifice per election just to vote (R))
To: beandog
If he picks a conservative VP his age could be a positive thing.
To: Obadiah
That’s silly. He did support Bork.
16
posted on
04/25/2008 6:02:00 PM PDT
by
Perdogg
(Reagan would have never said "She's my girl")
To: Obadiah
He signed on to LED the Gang of 14
17
posted on
04/25/2008 6:02:34 PM PDT
by
Just A Nobody
(PISSANT for President '08 - NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA)
To: EveningStar
What’s the difference between a socialist Dim president nominating Dim justices and RINO McCain nominating the same liberals? In the spirit of bipartisanship (and for favorable press coverage), he will nominate Hillary and other liberals to the court.
18
posted on
04/25/2008 6:02:38 PM PDT
by
peyton randolph
(Vote for the Dim in the primaries that leads to a brokered convention and chaos)
To: Hamilcar_Barca
"If he picks a conservative VP his age could be a positive thing."
His VP choice had better be a damn good CONSERVATIVE!!
19
posted on
04/25/2008 6:03:15 PM PDT
by
LADY J
To: Dog Gone
Yes, let Hillary or Obama win so they can replace any of them. They'll do so much better.
Vote for any of those three (ClintObamaCain) and you deserve what you get. Give up tired, foolish responses.
20
posted on
04/25/2008 6:03:39 PM PDT
by
CounterCounterCulture
(How many of your civil rights & liberties are you willing to sacrifice per election just to vote (R))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-276 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson