Posted on 04/20/2008 10:47:33 AM PDT by DogByte6RER
PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AGAINST ISLAM
A Proposed Constitutional Amendment
(Note the need for this Amendment at the end)
Background and justification to Amendment 28 (self-defense/survival measure)
Whereas; Religion is defined as an institution dedicated to improving social conscience and promoting individual and societal spiritual growth in a way that is harmless to others not participating in or practicing the same;
Whereas; the United States of America was founded on the ideals of individual rights, including the individual right to practice one’s religion of choice, or no religion, and that there would be no compulsion of religion, nor state sanctioned religion, nor a 'religious test' for participation in the body politic;
Whereas; Islam includes a complete political and social structure, encompassed by its religious law, Sharia, that supercedes any civil law and that Islam mandates that no secular or democratic institutions are to be superior to Islamic law;
Whereas; Islam preaches that it and it alone is the true religion and that Islam will dominate the world and supplant all other religions and democratic institutions;
Whereas; Saudi Arabia , the spiritual home of Islam does not permit the practice of any other religion on its soil and even 'moderate' Muslims states such as Turkey and Malaysia actively suppress other religions;
Whereas; Islam includes as its basic tenant the spread of the faith by any and all means necessary, including violent conquest of non-believers, and demands of its followers that they implement violent jihad (holy war) against those un-willing to convert or submit to Islam, including by deception and subversion of existing institutions;
Whereas; on 9/11/2001 19 Muslim hijackers acting in the name of Islam killed 3,000 Americans, and numerous other acts of terrorism have been directed at the American people around the world;
Whereas; representatives of Islam around the world including Osama Bin Laden (architect of 9/11), the government of Iran including Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, HAMAS, Hezbollah, and other Islamic groups have declared jihad (war) on America, and regularly declare that America should cease to exist;
Whereas; there is no organized Islamic opposition to violent proponents of Islam;
Therefore: Islam is not a religion, but a political ideology more akin to Fascism and totally in opposition to the ideals of freedom as described in the United States Constitution, especially the Bill of Rights.
Be it resolved that the following Amendment to the Constitution be adopted:
Article I
The social/political/ideological system known around the world as Islam is not recognized in the United States as a religion. The practice of Islam is therefore not protected under the 1st Amendment as to freedom of religion and speech.
Article II
As representatives of Islam around the world have declared war, and committed acts of war, against the United States and its democratic allies around the world, Islam is hereby declared an enemy of the United States and its practice within the United States is now prohibited.
Article III
Immediately upon passage of this Amendment all Mosques, schools and Muslim places of worship and religious training are to be closed, converted to other uses, or destroyed. Proceeds from sales of such properties may be distributed to congregations of said places but full disclosure of all proceeds shall be made to an appropriate agency as determined by Congress.
No compensation is to be offered by Federal or State agencies for losses on such properties however Federal funding is to be available for the demolishing of said structures if other disposition cannot be made.
The preaching of Islam in Mosques, Schools, and other venues is prohibited. The subject of Islam may be taught in a post high school academic environment provided that instruction include discussion of Islam’s history of violence, conquest, and its ongoing war on democratic and other non-Islamic values.
The preaching or advocating of Islamic ideals of world domination, destruction of America and democratic institutions, jihad against Judaism, Christianity and other religions, and advocating the implementation of Sharia law shall in all cases be punishable by fines, imprisonment, deportation, and death as proscribed by Congress.
Violent expressions of these and other Muslim goals, or the material support of those both in the United States and around the world who seek to advance these Islamic goals shall be punishable by death. Muslims will be denied the opportunity to immigrate to the United States .
Article IV
Nothing in this amendment shall be construed as authorizing the discrimination against, of violence upon, nor repudiation of the individual rights of those Americans professing to be Muslim. The individual right of conscience is sacrosanct and the practice of Islam within the privacy of home and self is strictly protected to the extent that such individuals do not violate the prohibitions described in Article III.
ISLAM is not a religion so what is your problem with the constitutional amendment?You let the muzzies take over and you will see a ban on religion.Ours.
IT PROTECTS ALL RELIGIONS IN THIS COUNTRY!!!
Rule #1 is: Don't turn into your enemy while trying to destroy him.
“Not just no, but hell no. You can’t sacrifice liberty to preserve America. It’s an oxymoron. One cannot exist without the other. Should this boneheaded Amendment pass, we’d cease being American at that very moment.”
Short, but succinct, rebuttal:
“The Constitution is not a suicide pact”
(I don’t recall the name of the U.S. Supreme Court Justice who wrote this, but one in fact did).
The proposed amendment is too long and too wordy to be worth consideration. It would never pass.
I would directly re-write the First Amendment, inserting language that the followers of Muhammed were not recognized as deserving of its protections.
Yes, I WOULD do that. And I would have NO fear for the future of the country.
So long as the existing First Amendment provides cover for Islam to destroy us from within, I DO fear for the future of this country.
I realize your opinion may be different from mine.
- John
I don't support it as an Amendment, but I do recognize that Islam is inconsistent with democracy.
And a serious threat to America and the rest of the free world, much as Nazism was.
Fortunately, You do not get a vote as to what does or does not become a Constitutional Amendment.
‘”Laws are made for the government of actions, and while they cannot interfere with mere religious belief and opinion, they may with practices.”’
VIKTOR FRANKEL:
THERE IS NO FREEDOM WITHOUT RESPNSIBILITY.
Freedom can be a tricky principle, truth, right, issue.
I’d normally prefer to err on the side of the benefit of the doubt and grace for all comers.
However, Islam has shown it’s true teeth and satanic violent destructiveness to all I hold dear.
I no longer see any sanity in giving them any quarter whatsoever.
Our Constitution was not designed to insure our destruction.
Ignoring Islam could easily insure our destruction.
Treating Islam with kid gloves would likely easily insure our destruction if God didn’t have other plans already in place.
In any case, it’s a moot issue. The Globalists will not allow Islam to be hindered as they use it to help destroy all other religions only to then destroy it in favor of the global religion of worshipping the coming world ruler—satan incarnate.
The difference between Islamic terrorists and Irish terrorists (who were NOT Christian) is that Muslim terrorists act in obedience of their Koran/religious teachings, whereas those Irish terrorists acting in complete contradiction of Christian teachings.
BTW, how much of a free society do you think we have left . . . already?
It’s hazardous to give the Feds used toilet paper or anything of more value.
Alas . . . there aren’t a lot of attractive options.
The US has for centuries banned numerous religious practices, e.g. virgin sacrifice. No court has reversed or, in my opinion, would DREAM of of reversing such bans.
Therefore, the fully Constitutional and precedent-oriented way to go about this is to pick out specific ''Islamic'' acts and practices that are unlawful already if not performed under the aegis of religion, and ban or otherwise make unlawful these assorted practices specifically in all cases.
Wouldn't be too difficult to persuade one hell of a lot of Islamists (a small redundancy, sorry) to boogie on out of here. Just a matter of picking the right practices to ban in order to annoy them sufficiently.
And in Utah they can teach the Book of Mormon in the schools? The Quran in Detroit? The Book of the Divine Crystal Gaea Goddess in California?
And who gets to choose what bible they read from? The Catholics and Jehovah's Witnesses don't use the same King James version as most Protestants do.
This is a book everyone should have.
I know.
Just expressing a futile seDiment.
“The Constitution is not a suicide pact”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Constitution_is_not_a_suicide_pact
I know it’s wiki, but there are some interesting points.
As I have said, the beliefs of the mohammedans are vile, but if you just glance to the left, you'll find many who believe Christianity is the same as mohammedanism. There are those who would enjoy seeing the head of the Catholic church cast in chains and dragged to the gibbet, give them power and no one is safe.
Get the ball rolling and it WILL NOT STOP.
Think people, use your reason and think! How many things in the constitution are used exclusively as intended and never abused or misinterpreted? You're falling into the trap of giving more power to your masters when he already holds you by the throat.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.